511
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Caught in the middle: early career researchers, public health and the emotional production of research

Pages 367-372 | Received 20 Mar 2018, Accepted 09 Nov 2018, Published online: 26 Nov 2018

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Alderman, J., Dollar, K. M., & Kozlowski, L. T. (2010). Understanding the origins of anger, contempt, and disgust in public health policy disputes: Applying moral psychology to harm reduction debates. Journal of Public Health Policy, 31(1), 1–16.
  • Askins, K. (2009). “That’s just what I do”: Placing emotion in academic activism. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 4–13.
  • Beck, U. (2005). How not to become a museum piece. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 335–343.
  • Bell, K. (2013). Whither tobacco studies? Sociology Compass, 7(1), 34–44.
  • Bell, K., & Dennis, S. (2013). Editorial. Towards a critical anthropology of smoking : Exploring the consequences. Contemporary Drug Problems, 40(Spring 2013), 3–19.
  • Bell, K., & Keane, H. (2012). Nicotine control: E-cigarettes, smoking and addiction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23(3), 242–247.
  • Burawoy, M. (2005). For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 4–18.
  • Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2017). Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, 15, 35.
  • Caretta, M. A., Drozdzewski, D., Jokinen, J. C., & Falconer, E. (2018). “Who can play this game?” The lived experiences of doctoral candidates and early career women in the neoliberal university. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03098265.2018.1434762
  • Chapman, S. (2014). E-cigarettes: Does the new emperor of tobacco harm reduction have any clothes? European Journal of Public Health, 24(4), 535–536.
  • de Andrade, M., Spotswood, F., Hastings, G., Angus, K., & Angelova, N. (2017). Emotion in the ANDS (alternative nicotine delivery systems) market: Practice-theoretical insight into a volatile market. Social Business, 7(3), 391–418.
  • Elam, M. J. (2015). Nicorette reborn ? E-cigarettes in light of the history of nicotine replacement technology. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(6), 536–542.
  • Etter, J.-F. (2015). E-cigarettes: Methodological and ideological issues and research priorities. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1–3.
  • Fairchild, A. L., Bayer, R., & Colgrove, J. (2014). The Renormalization of Smoking? E-Cigarettes and the Tobacco “Endgame.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(4), 293–295.
  • Gornall, J. (2015). Why e-cigarettes are dividing the public health community. BMJ 2015, 350, h3317. doi:10.1136/bmj.h3317
  • Greer, S. L., Bekker, M., De Leeuw, E., Wismar, M., Helderman, J.-K., Ribeiro, S., & Stuckler, D. (2017). Policy, politics and public health. European Journal of Public Health, 27(Supplement 4), 40–43.
  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of the human feeling. London: University of California Press.
  • Keane, H., Weier, M., Fraser, D., & Gartner, C. (2017). “Anytime, anywhere”: Vaping as social practice. Critical Public Health, 27(4), 465–476.
  • Kosmider, L., & Anastasi, N. (2016). Ideology versus evidence: Investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest. Preventive Medicine, 85, 113–114.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
  • Macnaughton, J., Carro-Ripalda, S., & Russell, A. (2012). “Risking enchantment”: How are we to view the smoking person? Critical Public Health, 22(4), 455–469.
  • Mair, M., & Kierans, C. (2007). Critical reflections on the field of tobacco research: The role of tobacco control in defining the tobacco research agenda. Critical Public Health, 17(2), 103–112.
  • Malas, M., Van Der Tempel, J., Schwartz, R., Minichiello, A., Lightfoot, C., Noormohamed, A., … Ferrence, R. (2016). Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A systematic review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 1926–1936.
  • McKay, L., & Monk, S. (2017). Early career academics learning the game in Whackademia. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1251–1263.
  • O’Donoughue Jenkins, L., Kelly, P. M., Cherbuin, N., & Anstey, K. J. (2016). Evaluating and using observational evidence: The contrasting views of policy makers and epidemiologists. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 267.
  • Pisinger, C. (2016). Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section. Preventive Medicine, 85, 115.
  • Smith, K. E., & Stewart, E. (2015). ‘Black magic’ and ‘gold dust’: The epistemic and political uses of evidence tools in public health policy making. Evidence and Policy, 11(3), 415–437.
  • Warner, K. E. (2018). How to think—Not feel—About tobacco harm reduction. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty084

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.