Relational, ethically sound co-production in mental health care research: epistemic injustice and the need for an ethics of care

References

• Abma, T. A., Banks, S., Cook, T., Dias, S., Madsen, W., Springett, J., & Wright, M. (2019). Participatory research for health and social well-being. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Abma, T. A., Leyerzapf, H., & Landeweer, E. (2017). Responsive evaluation in the interference zone between system and lifeworld. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(4), 507–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016667211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma, T. A., Visse, M., Hanberger, A., Simons, H., & Greene, J. (2020). Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics. Evaluation, 26(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019893402
   Google Scholar
• Baart, I., & Abma, T. (2011). Patient participation in fundamental psychiatric genomics research: A Dutch case study. Health Expectations, 14(3), 240–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00634.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2019). Ethics in participatory research for health and social well-being: Cases and commentaries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Russo, J. (2016). Supporting the sustainability of Mad Studies and preventing its co-option. Disability & Society, 31(2), 270–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1145380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Crichton, P., Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2017). Epistemic injustice in psychiatry. BJPsych Bulletin, 41(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.050682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, N., Funk, M., Tang, S., Lamichhane, J., Chávez, E., Katontoka, S., Pathare, S., Lewis, O., Gostin, L., & Saraceno, B. (2011). Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: An unresolved global crisis. The Lancet, 378(9803), 1664–1675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61458-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. (2004). The ethics of survivor research: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of research carried out by mental health service users and survivors. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz, M. (2018). Service user involvement and perspectives. In J. Santos & J. Cutcliffe (Eds.), European psychiatric/mental health nursing in the 21st century. Principles of specialty nursing (Under the auspices of the European Specialist Nurses Organisations) (pp. 29–35). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. S., & Glass, R. D. (2017). Ethical, epistemic, and political issues in equity-oriented collaborative community-based research. In L. Rowell, C. Bruce, J. Shosh, & M. Riel (Eds.), The palgrave international handbook of action research (pp. 511–525). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2017). The contribution of experiential wisdom to the development of the mental health professional discourse. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(3), 481–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2009). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2013). Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? Synthese, 190(7), 1317–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0227-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glas, G., & de Ridder, G. J. (Eds.). (2018). The future of creation order: Vol. 1, philosophical, scientific, and religious perspectives on order and emergence. (New approaches to the scientific study of religion; Vol. 3). Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. D., & Newman, A. (2015). Ethical and epistemic dilemmas in knowledge production: Addressing their intersection in collaborative, community-based research. Theory and Research in Education, 13(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515571178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, B., Vink, M., Schout, G., Hubert, M., & Abma, T. (2019). Pathways for improvement of care in psychiatric crisis: A plea for the co-creation with service users and ethics of care. Archives of Psychology, 3(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31296/aop.v3i3.99
   Google Scholar
• Groot, B. C., Vink, M., Haveman, A., Huberts, M., Schout, G., & Abma, T. A. (2018). Ethics of care in participatory health research: Mutual responsibility in collaboration with co-researchers. Educational Action Research, 27(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1450771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, B.C., & Abma, T.A. (2019). Participatory health research with older people in the netherlands: Navigating power imbalances towards Mutually Transforming Power. In Participatory Health Research (pp. 165-178). Cham: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hersted, L., Ness, O., & Frimann, S. (2019). Action research in a relational perspective: Dialogue, reflexivity, power and ethics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H. (2017). Epistemic injustice and illness. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordentoft, H. M., & Olesen, B. R. (2018). A critical reflexive perspective on othering in collaborative knowledge production. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paphitis, S. A. (2018). The possibility of addressing epistemic injustice through engaged research practice: Reflections on a menstruation related critical health education project in South Africa. Critical Public Health, 28(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1418500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., Olesen, B. R., Scheffmann-Petersen, M., & Nordentoft, H. M. (2018). De-romanticising dialogue in collaborative health care research: A critical, reflexive approach to tensions in an action research project’s initial phase. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2018.7178
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L., & Sariola, S. (2018). The ethics and politics of community engagement in global health research. Critical Public Health, 28(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1449598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (2009). Collaboration. In J. Wallcraft, B. Schrank, & M. Amering (Eds.), Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research (pp. 169–179). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. (2012). Survivor-controlled research: A new foundation for thinking about psychiatry and mental health. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13 (1). Art. 8. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120187
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (2010). Hearing (our) voices: Participatory research in mental health. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H., & Greene, J. (2014, October). Against the odds but worth it: The value of democratic evaluation in contemporary society. European Evaluation Society.
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, P. (2015). Mental health service users in research: Critical sociological perspectives. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telford, R., & Faulkner, A. (2004). Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 13(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230400017137
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hughes, H. (2018). Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: Reflections from a UK-based case study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1364065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornicroft, G., & Tansella, M. (2005). Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiologia E Psichiatria Sociale, 14(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00001858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners: Qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181(6), 468–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.181.6.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, K., & Gillard, S. (2012). Still out there? Is the service user voice becoming lost as user involvement moves into the mental health research mainstream? In M. Barnes & P. Cotterell (Eds.), Critical perspectives on user involvement (pp. 189-201). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, M., Groot, B., Schout, G., Abma, T., & Huberts, M. (2017). Goede zorg bij crisis: Het belang van contact [Good care in crisis: the importance of contact]. Centrum voor Cliëntervaringen. https://tinyurl.com/y93xo4k4
   Google Scholar
• Visse, M., & Abma, T. A. (Eds.). (2018). Evaluation for a Caring Society. IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Way, N., Ali, A., Gilligan, C., & Noguera, P. (Eds.). (2018). The crisis of connection, roots, consequences and solutions. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weerman, A., & Abma, T. (2018). Social work students learning to use their experiential knowledge of recovery. An existential and emancipatory perspective. Social Work Education, 38(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1538335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelders, S. (2020). Power-full patient participation. Opening spaces for silenced knowledge. (Doctoral thesis, VU University).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. T., & Kongats, K. (2019). Participatory health research: Voices from around the world. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar