The affective economy of vaping: a qualitative analysis of responses to an online questionnaire

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004a). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004b). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annechino, R., & Antin, T. (2016). Taking sides in E-cigarette research. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2016(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01079
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. h t tps://d o i.o rg/h ttp://d x.d oi.o rg/1 0.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. M., Denlinger-Apte, R. L., Dermody, S. S., King, J. L., Mercincavage, M., Pacek, L. R., Smith, T. T., Tripp, H. L., & White, C. M. (2021). Polarization within the field of tobacco and nicotine science and its potential impact on trainees. Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 23(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, J. 2016. E-cigarettes, harm reduction and the tobacco industry. In Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction, Ed. Royal College of Physicians (pp.135–150). The Lavenham Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Andrade, M., Spotswood, F., Hastings, G., Angus, K., & Angelova, N. (2017). Emotion in the ANDS (alternative nicotine delivery systems) market: Practice-theoretical insight into a volatile market. Social Business, 7(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440817X15108539431569
   Google Scholar
• Deem, A. (2019). The digital traces of #whitegenocide and alt-right affective economies of transgression. International Journal of Communication, 13, 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php.ijoc/article/view/9631/2717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, M., & Green, D. (2019). Context is crucial: Wading through public health information. Practice Nursing, 30(9), 456–457. https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2019.30.9.456
   Google Scholar
• Elam, M. J. (2015). Nicorette reborn ? E-cigarettes in light of the history of nicotine replacement technology. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(6), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faircloth, C. (2013). “What feels right”: Affect, emotion, and the limitations of infant-feeding policy. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 34(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2013.835678
   Google Scholar
• Farrimond, H. (2017). A typology of vaping: Identifying differing beliefs, motivations for use, identity and political interest amongst e-cigarette users. International Journal of Drug Policy, 48, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornall, J. (2015). Why e-cigarettes are dividing the public health community. BMJ, 350(jun23 10), h3317–h3317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3317
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammond, D. (2019). Outbreak of pulmonary diseases linked to vaping. BMJ, l5445. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5445
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, G., de Andrade, M., & Moodie, C. (2012). Tobacco harm reduction: The devil is in the deployment. Bmj, 345(December), e8412. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hays, T. J., & Hurt, R. D. (2019). Why we will never work with the tobacco industry. Addiction, 114(5), 934–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, R. (2017). Offline: Difficult truths about a post-truth world. The Lancet, 389(10076), 1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30878-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, H., Weier, M., Fraser, D., & Gartner, C. (2017). “Anytime, anywhere”: Vaping as social practice. Critical Public Health, 27(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2016.1250867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, L. T. (2017). Minors, moral psychology, and the harm reduction debate: The case of tobacco and nicotine. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(6), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-4193642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, H., Simas, C., & Horton, R. (2020). The emotional determinants of health: The lancet-london school of hygiene & tropical medicine commission. The Lancet, 395(10226), 768–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30050-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucherini, M. (2020a). Caught in the middle: Early career researchers, public health and the emotional production of research. Critical Public Health, 30(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1550252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucherini, M. (2020b). Spontaneity and serendipity: Space and time in the lives of people with diabetes. Social Science & Medicine, 245, 112723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112723
   Google Scholar
• Lucherini, M., Rooke, C., & Amos, A. (2018). E-cigarettes, vaping and performativity in the context of tobacco denormalisation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40(6), 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). The pedagogy of disgust: The ethical, moral and political implications of using disgust in public health campaigns. Critical Public Health, 25(February), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.885115
   Google Scholar
• Morphett, K., Herron, L., & Gartner, C. (2020). Protectors or puritans? Responses to media articles about the health effects of e-cigarettes. Addiction Research and Theory, 28(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1596259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykhalovskiy, E., Frohlich, K. L., Poland, B., Di Ruggiero, E., Rock, M. J., & Comer, L. (2019). Critical social science with public health: Agonism, critique and engagement. Critical Public Health, 29(5), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1474174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, J. N. (2019). Time for The Lancet to realign with the evidence on e-cigarettes? The Lancet, 394(10211), 1804–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32486-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notley, C., Ward, E., Dawkins, L., & Holland, R. (2018). The unique contribution of e-cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction in supporting smoking relapse prevention. Harm Reduction Journal, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0237-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross, L. (2015). Scaremongering about e-cigarettes is not in the best interest of patients. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 295(7882), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1211/pj.2015.20069511
   Google Scholar
• Saebø, G., & Scheffels, J. (2017). Assessing notions of denormalization and renormalization of smoking in light of e-cigarette regulation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 49, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., Lucherini, M., Amos, A., & Hill, S. (2021). International Journal of Drug Policy The emerging norms of e-cigarette use among adolescents : A meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 94, 103227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokle, R. (2020). Bottom-up meets top-down: Exploring vapers’ accounts of risk in a context of e-cigarette controversies. Health, Risk & Society, 22(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2020.1749571
   Google Scholar
• Tokle, R., & Pedersen, W. (2019). “Cloud chasers” and “substitutes”: E-cigarettes, vaping subcultures and vaper identities. Sociology of Health and Illness, 41(5), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, K. E. (2018). How to Think—Not Feel—about Tobacco Harm Reduction. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 21(10), 1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, R., Baldassar, L., Gamage, S., Worrell, S., & Mohamud, S. (2020). Digital media and the affective economies of transnational families. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(5), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920920278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar