‘What is the meaning of the word “wife?”’ The impact of the immigration laws on the wives of resident Indians in South Africa 1897–1930

References

• “Asiatic Population of the Transvaal.” 1914. Indian Opinion, May 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bhana, S., and J. Brain. 1990. Setting Down Roots: Indian Migrants in South Africa 1860–1911. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhana Collection, Governor of Natal to the Secretary of State. 16 July 1894. Indians in Natal up to 1910, Document No. 957/3051.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, K., and S. Szreter, eds. 2012. Registration and Recognition: Documenting the Person in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CAD (Cape Archives Depot). Interior Regional Director, Cape Town (IRC), File of 1-1-124A Baba Wajudien.
   Google Scholar
• The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, XI (April 1911–March 1913). Ahmedabad, Navajivan Trust, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, XII (April 1913–December 1914). Ahmedabad, Navajivan Trust, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Colony of Natal Census Report. 1891, 1904.
   Google Scholar
• CSO (Colonial Secretary’s Office). 1593 5118/1897.
   Google Scholar
• “The Demands of the Immigration Department.” 1914. Indian Opinion, May 6.
   Google Scholar
• Dhupelia-Mesthrie, U. 2011. “The Form, the Permit and the Photograph: An Archive of Mobility Between India and South Africa.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 46 (6): 650–662. doi: 10.1177/0021909611409141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhupelia-Mesthrie, U. 2013. “Cat and Mouse Games: The State, Indians in the Cape and the Permit System, 1900s–1920s.” In Identification and Registration in Transnational Perspective: People, Places and Practices, edited by I. About, J. Brown and G. Lonergan, 185–202. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dhupelia-Mesthrie, U. 2014a. “Split-Households: Indian Wives, Cape Town Husbands and Immigration Laws, 1900s to 1940s.” South African Historical Journal 66 (4): 635–655. doi: 10.1080/02582473.2014.935800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhupelia-Mesthrie, U. 2014b. “False Fathers and False Sons: Immigration Officials in Cape Town, Documents and Verifying Minor Sons from India in the First Half of the Twentieth Century.” Kronos 40 (1): 99–132.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. 2005. The Qualities of a Citizen: Women, Immigration, and Citizenship, 1870–1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiralal, K. 2009. “‘Our Plucky Sisters Who Have Dared to Fight’: Indian Women and the Satyagraha Movement in South Africa.” The Oriental Anthropologist 9 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1177/0976343020090101
   Google Scholar
• Hiralal, K. 2013a. “Mapping Free Indian Migration to Natal Through a Biographical Lens, 1880–1930.” New Contree 66: 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hiralal, K. 2013b. “‘Daughters of Gujarat in the Diaspora’: Immigrant Women, Identity and Agency in Natal.” Journal for Contemporary History 38 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hiralal, K. 2014. “Women and Migration in South Africa: Historical and Literary Perspectives.” South Asian Diaspora 6 (1): 63–75. doi: 10.1080/19438192.2013.829959
   Google Scholar
• Hiralal, K. 2016. “Gendered Migrations: A Comparative Study of Indentured and Non-indentured Immigrants to South Africa 1860–1930.” Diaspora Studies 9 (1): 41–52. doi: 10.1080/09739572.2015.1088613
   Google Scholar
• IIAB (Indian Immigration Appeal Board). KCM 99/53/1, File 1.
   Google Scholar
• IIAB (Indian Immigration Appeal Board). KCM 99/53/2, File 2.
   Google Scholar
• IIAB (Indian Immigration Appeal Board). KCM 99/53/4, File 4.
   Google Scholar
• IIAB (Indian Immigration Appeal Board). KCM 99/53/5, File 5.
   Google Scholar
• “Immigration Restriction.” 1912. Indian Opinion, August 31.
   Google Scholar
• “The Immigration Scandals.” 1913. Indian Opinion, February 15.
   Google Scholar
• “Indian Women as Passive Resisters.” 1913. Indian Opinion, May 10.
   Google Scholar
• IRD (Immigration Restriction Department). 162/1898.
   Google Scholar
• IRD (Immigration Restriction Department). Annual Report 1907.
   Google Scholar
• IRD (Immigration Restriction Department). Departmental Reports 1907, Vol. 92.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, P. S. 1942. The Tyranny of Colour – A Study of the Indian Problem in South Africa. Durban: EP & Commercial Printing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. 2012. “The Identity Thieves of the Indian Ocean: Forgery, Fraud and the Origins of South African Immigration Control, 1890s–1920.” In Registration and Recognition; Documenting the Person in World History, edited by K. Breckenridge and S. Szreter, 253–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, Anne S. 2007. From Colony to Nation: Women Activists and the Gendering of Politics in Belize, 1912–1982. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• “Mahomedan Wives.” 1912. Indian Opinion, February 24.
   Google Scholar
• “Mahomedan Wives.” 1912. Indian Opinion, May 4.
   Google Scholar
• “Mahomedan Wives.” 1912. Indian Opinion, June 22.
   Google Scholar
• “Mass Meeting at Johannesburg.” 1913. Indian Opinion, April 5.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, Ann. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mesthrie Shashikant, Uma. 1997. “From Advocacy to Mobilization Indian Opinion, 1903–1914.” In South Africa’s Alternative Press Voices of Protest and Resistance, 1880s–1960s, edited by Les Switzer, 99–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mongia, R. 2006. “Gender and the Historiography of Gandhian Satyagraha in South Africa.” Gender & History 18 (1): 130–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0424.2006.00418.x
   Google Scholar
• “Mrs Jussat’s Case.” 1912. Indian Opinion, March 16.
   Google Scholar
• Natal, Blue Book. 1871. Pietermaritzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Natal, Report of the Indian Immigrants Commission 1885–1887. Wragge.
   Google Scholar
• Natal, Report of the Indian Immigrants Commission (Clayton) 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksy, E. H., J. Hearn, and D. Golaǹska. 2011. The Limits of Gendered Citizenship Contexts and Complexities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• “Photographs Again.” 1916. Indian Opinion, July 7.
   Google Scholar
• “Press Comments on the Bill.” 1913. Indian Opinion, June 7.
   Google Scholar
• “The Question of Photographs.” 1918. Indian Opinion, August 16.
   Google Scholar
• “Regulations.” 1913. Indian Opinion, August 2.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Asiatic Inquiry Commission. 1921. UG 4 1921. Cape Town: Cape Times Limited, Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Immigration Officer. Port Natal for the Year Ending 1900.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, K. 2009. Paper Citizens: How Illegal Immigrants Acquire Citizenship in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. 2003. Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• “The Senate Debate.” 1913. Indian Opinion, August 2.
   Google Scholar
• Smearman, Claire A. 2009. “Second Wives’ Club: Mapping the Impact of Polygamy in U.S. Immigration Law.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 27: 382. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/bjil/vol27/iss2/3.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon Commission 1914, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Swart, Sandra Scott. 2007. “‘Motherhood and Otherhood’ – Gendered Citizenship and Afrikaner Women in the South African 1914 Rebellion.” African Historical Review 39 (2): 41–57. doi: 10.1080/17532520701786160
   Google Scholar
• Vahed, V. 2003. “Muslim Marriages in South Africa: The Limitations and Legacy of the Indian Relief Act of 1914.” Journal of Natal and Zulu History 21: 1–40. doi: 10.1080/02590123.2003.11964120
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 1996. “Woman and Nation.” In Mapping the Nation, edited by Gopal Balakrishnan, 235–254. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., and F. Anthias, eds. 1989. Woman-Nation-State. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar