Imagined and unimagined relatedness: a child of ‘one’s own’ in third-party reproduction in India

References

• Banerjee, Amrita. 2014. “Race and a Transnational Reproductive Caste System: Indian Transnational Surrogacy.” Hypatia 29 (1): 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, K., and B. Singla. 2018. “Acceptance of Donor Eggs, Donor Sperms, or Donor Embryos in Indian Infertile Couples.” Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 11: 169–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bärnreuther, Sandra. 2018. “Suitable Substances: How Biobanks (Re) Store Biologicals.” New Genetics and Society 37 (4): 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2003. “Why Adoption is Not an Option in India: The Visibility of Infertility, the Secrecy of Donor Insemination, and Other Cultural Complexities.” Social Science and Medicine 56 (9): 1867–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2016. Conceptions: Infertility and Procreative Technologies in India. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, Cecilia. 1997. “Permeable and Partible Persons: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Body in South India and Melanesia.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3 (2): 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Dwipama, and Devanathan Parthasarathy. 2017. “Gentrification and Rising Urban Aspirations in the Inner City: Redefining Urbanism in Mumbai.” In Sustainable Urbanization in India: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by J. Mukherjee, 239–256. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Copeman, Jacob. 2013. “South Asian Tissue Economies.” Contemporary South Asia 21 (3): 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Copeman, Jacob, and Dwaipayan Banerjee. 2019. Hematologies: The Political Life of Blood in India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, E. Valentine. 1987. Fluid Signs: Being a Person the Tamil Way. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deomampo, Daisy. 2016. Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, Leela. 1986. “Seed and Earth: The Symbolism of Biological Reproduction and Sexual Relations of Production.” In Visibility and Power: Essays on Women in Society and Development, edited by Leela Dube, Eleanor Leacock and Shirley Ardeneer, 22–41. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Jeanette, and Marilyn Strathern. 2000. “Including Our Own.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, edited by Janet Carsten, 149–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah. 1999. “Making Representations: The Parliamentary Debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.” In Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, edited by Jeanette Edwards, Sarah Franklin, Eric Hirsch, Frances Price and Marilyn Strathern, 127–165. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Tabhita. 2014. “Introduction.” In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities, edited by Tabitha Freeman, Susanna Graham, Fatemeh Ebtehaj, and Martin Richards, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fruzzetti, Lina, and Ákos Östör. 1984. Kinship and Ritual in Bengal: Anthropological Essays. New Delhi: South Asian Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Fruzzetti, Lina, Ákos Östör, and Steve Barnett. 1982. “The Cultural Construction of the Person in Bengal and Tamil Nadu.” In Concepts of Person: Kinship, Caste, and Marriage in India, edited by Lina Fruzzetti, Ákos Östör, and Steve Barnett, 8–30. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Joyce C., Debbie Kennett, and Dan Reisel. 2016. “The End of Donor Anonymity: How Genetic Testing is Likely to Drive Anonymous Gamete Donation Out of Business.” Human Reproduction 31 (6): 1135–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). 2010. Draft Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, Vasanti, N. Lamba, K. Kadam, and S. Golomboc. 2015. “Indian Egg Donor’s Characteristics, Motivations and Feelings Towards the Recipient and Resultant Child.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 1 (2): 98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, Katherine M. 2017. “Contingent Maternities? Maternal Claims-Making in Third Party Reproduction.” Sociology of Health & Illness 39 (8): 1349–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, Monica. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange Between British Ova Donors and Recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, Fiona, and Susan Golombok. 2007. “Embryo Donation Families: Mothers’ Decisions Regarding Disclosure of Donor Conception.” Human Reproduction 22: 2888–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, Anindita. 2017. Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, Anindita. 2019. Surrogacy (Oxford India Short Introductions). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marriot, McKim. 1976. “Hindu Transactions: Diversity Without Dualism.” In Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior, edited by Bruce Kapferer, 109–142. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Marriot, McKim, ed. 1990. India Through Hindu Categories. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, Mizuho. 2013. Jendar to ripurodakusyon no jinruigaku: Indo nouson shakai de funin wo ikiru joseitachi [in Japanese, Anthropology of Gender and Reproduction: Living Childless in Rural India]. Kyoto: Showado.
   Google Scholar
• Nandeem, Shehzard. 2014. “Fair and Anxious: On Mimicry and Skin-Lightening in India.” Social Identities 20 (2-3): 224–238.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. 2009. “‘It May Be Her Eggs But It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology 32: 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, Saritha. 2010. “More and More Indians Want Egg Donors, but only if They’re from the Right Caste.” The Global Post, September 22.
   Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2015. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: NYC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockey-Bridge, Michaela. 2017. The Lure of Hope: On the Transnational Surrogacy Trail from Australia to India. Vancouver: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2001. “Strategic Naturalizing: Kinship in an Infertility Clinic.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, edited by Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon, 175–202. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Times of India. 2019. “Abused as ‘Barren’, Woman Gives Birth to Twins at 74.” September 6. Accessed 19 May 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/abused-as-barren-woman-gives-birth-to-twins-at-74/articleshow/71001643.cms.
   Google Scholar
• Vaid, Jyotsna. 2009. “Fair Enough? Color and the Commodification of Self in Indian Matrimonials.” In Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, 148–165. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vora, Kalindi. 2013. “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy.” Current Anthropology 54 (7): S97–S106.
   Google Scholar