Fostering teachers' design expertise in teacher design teams: conducive design and support activities

References

• Anto, A. G. (2013). Collaborative teacher professional development in Ethiopian higher education: The case of communicative language teaching (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S., & Kelson, A. M. (1993). Problem-based learning: A total approach to education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Retrieved from http://wed.siu.edu/Faculty/bputnam/584/PBL%20Document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers’ practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, G. M., & Seixas, P. (1998). Subjects and disciplines: Asymmetries in a collaborative curriculum development project. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? LeTUR Report Series (pp. 1–11). Evanston, IL: The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• DeKetelaere, A., & Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Collaborative curriculum development: An encounter of different professional knowledge systems. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R.M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse: Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2010). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum design in teacher design teams (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P.L., Ge, X., & Thomas, M.K. (2006). An investigation of development toward instructional design expertise. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(4), 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havnes, A. (2009). Talk, planning and decision-making in interdisciplinary teacher teams: A case study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, T. (2009). Op weg naar een instrument voor het meten van docentcompetenties voor het ontwikkelen van curricula [Towards an instrument to measure teacher's competencies for the development of curricula]. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. T. (1981). How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design. Instructional Science, 10, 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, J. W. M. (1993). Towards design standards for curriculum consistency in corporate education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels, J. W. M., & Plomp, T. (1999). A systematic and relational approach to obtaining curriculum consistency in corporate education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 679–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. M. (2011). The facilitator's role in elementary mathematics professional development. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 44–66.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. A., & Orey, M. A. (1991). Reconceptualizing the instructional design process: Lessons learned from cognitive science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N. (2009). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 89–102). Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., Handelzalts, A., Van den Akker, J., & Homminga, S. (2005). Teacher design teams: A scenario for school-based curriculum innovation. Paper presented at the ECER, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Odenthal, L. E. (2003). Op zoek naar balans: Een onderzoek naar een methode ter ondersteuning van curriculum vernieuwing door docenten [Searching for balance: Researching methods for supporting curriculum renewal by teachers]. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, K., Parker, M., & Neutzling, M. M. (2012). Tennis shoes required: The role of the facilitator in professional development. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(4), 522–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competences: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse: Syracuse University Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1991). Survey of instructional design needs and competencies. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, G. M. (2007). Teacher design teams (TDTs) – building capacity for innovation, learning and curriculum implementation in the continuing professional development of in-career teachers. Irish Educational Studies, 26(2), 163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. J. H. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. J. H. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. J. H., & Voogt, J. (1994). The use of innovation and practice profiles in the evaluation of curriculum implementation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 503–512.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., Van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. (2013). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & de Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teacher and Teaching Education, 27(8), 1235–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar