Fidelity of implementation: bringing written curriculum materials into the equation

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles ad prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Pitvorec, K., Ditto, C., & Kelso, C. (2009). Reconceiving fidelity of implementation: An investigation of elementary whole-number lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 363–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(40), 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Century, J., Freeman, C., & Rudnick, M. (2012). Measuring implementation of instructional materials to support conceptual understanding and accumulation of knowledge. In D. Heck, K. Chval, I. Weiss, & S. Ziebarth (Eds.), Approaches to studying the enacted mathematics curriculum (pp. 117–142). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chval, K., Grouws, D., Smith, M., & Ziebarth, S. (2006). A cross-site study of local factors affecting mathematics curriculum enactment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327–345.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, C., & Sherin, M. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraivillig, J., Murphy, L., & Fuson, K. (1999). Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garan, E. M. (2004). In defense of our children: When politics, profit, and education collide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the ‘voice’ of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 344–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C. (Ed.). (2007). Perspectives on the design and development of school mathematics curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Huntley, M. (2009). Measuring curriculum implementation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, C. (2007). The case of Math Trailblazers: A mathematical journey using science and language arts. In C. Hirsch (Ed.), Perspectives on the design and development of school mathematics curricula (pp. 37–48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J., & Bryans, M. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J., Reinke, L., Hoe, N., Taton, J., Kim, O., Atanga, N., & Lewis, S. (2011). A comparative analysis of mathematical pedagogical components of five elementary mathematics curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Reys, B., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Report of Working Group 3: Instructional materials and curriculum. In F. Lester & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), Proceedings of the NCTM research catalyst Conference (pp. 133–140). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. (2005). A multi-method and multi-source approach for studying fidelity of implementation. In S. Lynch (Chair) & C. O’Donnell (Eds.), Fidelity of implementation’ in implementation and scale-up research designs: Applications from four studies of innovative science curriculum materials and diverse populations. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., Valverde, G., Houang, R., & Wiley, D. (1997). Many Visions, many aims. Vol. 1: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., & Jennings, N. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98, 449–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., & Zeuli, J. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M., Engle, R., Smith, M., & Hughes, E. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussion: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37–55). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M., & Smith, M. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M., Smith, M., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, J., Chavez, O., Reys, R., & Reys, B. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191–201.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, J., Reys, R., Reys, B., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. (2008). The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 247–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2013). Replacing the ‘teacher-proof’ curriculum with the ‘curriculum-proof’ teacher: Toward more effective interactions with mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TIMS Project. (2004). Exploring multiplication. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Trafton, P., Reys, B., & Wasman, D. (2001). Standards-based mathematics curriculum materials: A phrase in search of a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartuli, S., & Rohs, J. (2009). Assurance of outcome evaluation: Curriculum fidelity. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 502–512.
   Google Scholar