Formative assessment: translating high-level curriculum principles into classroom practice

References

• Assessment Action Group/AiFL Programme Management Group. (2002–2008). AifL—Assessment is for learning. Retrieved from http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: Cambridge University, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2014). The whole child approach to education. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wholechildeducation.org/about
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy grades K-6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–73.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9–25). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil–pupil and teacher–pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 750–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, J., & Wood, J. (2014). Supporting student transitions 14–19: Approaches to teaching and learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K.L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40–87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, N. (2010). The influence of the outdoor environment: Den-making in three different contexts. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauley, M. C., & McMillan, J. H. (2009). FA techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House, 83(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2014). Equitable learning outcomes: Supporting economically and culturally disadvantaged students in ‘formative learning environments’. Improving Schools, 17(1), 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (1993). Determination and contradiction: An appreciation and critique of the work of Pierre Bourdieu on language and education. In L. E. C. Calhoun (Ed.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 116–137). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Daigle, B. (2013). Integrated curriculum. College of Education, Atlanta, GA: Mercer University.
   Google Scholar
• Danileson, C. (2011). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Maher, C., & Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R. & Hoskins, B. (2008). Learning how to learn and active citizenship: Different currency or twin sides of the same coin? Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). Assessment for learning: Strategies for self- and peer-assessment. London: British Government. Retrieved from http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/64499
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Excellence and enjoyment: A strategy for primary schools. London: British Government. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040722013944/dfes.gov.uk/primarydocument/
   Google Scholar
• Department for Employment and Learning. (2010). Lifelong learning. London: British Government. Retrieved from http://www.delni.gov.uk/index/publications/pubs-further-education/fe-lifelong-learning.htm
   Google Scholar
• Desai, S. (2007). Research brief: Interdisciplinary teaming at the high school level. Omaha, NE: The Principal's Partnership/Union Pacific Foundation. Retrieved from http://oemanagement.com/data/_files/Interdiscteaming.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn.
   Google Scholar
• Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. (2011). Transforming formative assessment in lifelong learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2005). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? In E. Eisner (Ed.), Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot E. Eisner (pp. 205–214). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EPPI-Centre. (2005). Research evidence of the impact on students of self- and peer-assessment. Social Science Research Unit. London: Institute of Education (IoE). Retrieved from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/eppiwebcontent/reel/review_groups/assessment/assessment_protocol5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (2005). Ready for the real world? Americans speak on high school reform. Princeton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Policy cooperation and innovation in lifelong learning. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/ka1/policy_cooperation_innovation_en.php
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. (2008). The architecture of ownership. Educational Leadership, 66(3). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov08/vol66/num03/The-Architecture-of-Ownership.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. (2008). Arts in education and creativity: A review of the literature. London: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ, 323(7316), 799–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the primary classroom. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• George Street Research. (2007). Evaluation of the status of assessment of learning in Scotland 2006–2007. Learning and Teaching Scotland (LTS). Scotland: Scottish Government. Retrieved from http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/publications/e/publication_tcm4509473.asp
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia. (2012). Gumeracha primary school site improvement plan: ‘Together we achieve’. Department for Education and Child Development. Adelaide: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.gumerachr7.sa.edu.au/pdfs/site_learning_plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guionnet, S., Nadel, J., Bertasi, E., Sperduti, M., Delaveau, P., & Fossati, P. (2012). Reciprocal imitation: Toward a neural basis of social interaction. Cerebral Cortex, 22(4), 971–978. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189×032005019
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., Kirton, A., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2004). Evaluation of project 1 of the AiFL development programme: Support for professional practice in formative assessment. London: Institute of Education (IoE). Retrieved from www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/10/19947/42988
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. University of Auckland, New Zealand: Inaugural professorial lecture. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, G. (2006). Re-thinking lifelong learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(1/2), 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B., & Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? (JRC Scientific and Technical Reports). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Krill, A. L., & Platek, S. M. (2012). Working together may be better: Activation of reward centers during a cooperative maze task. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e30613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030613.t002
   Google Scholar
• Laal, M., & Salamati, P. (2012). Lifelong learning: Why do we need it? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 399–403.
   Google Scholar
• Lappan, G., & Briars, D. (1995). How should mathematics be taught? In I. M. Carl (Ed.), Seventy-five years of progress: Prospects for school mathematics (pp. 131–156). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J., & Poskitt, J. (2005). New Zealand: Embedding formative assessment in multiple policy initiatives. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 177–184). Paris: Centre for Educational Innovation and Research, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. (2014). Developing autonomous and responsible learners: A key to motivating students. Washington, DC: APA. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/learners.aspx
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, L. M., Buck, G., & Beckenhauer, A. (2007). Formative assessment requires artistic vision. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(4), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Bohil, C. J. (2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 650–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddox, W. T., & Ing, D. (2005). Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(1), 100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle, B. (2013). Preparing high-school students for the interdisciplinary nature of modern biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 144–147. doi:10.1087/cbe.13-03-0047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD/CERI.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). Education today 2013: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD/CERI.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Washington, DC: P21. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peel District School Board. (2011). Evidence of learning: Grades 1–12. CISESS. Peel District School Board. Retrieved from http://assessment4learning.com/pdf/PeelSchoolDistrict/Evidence%20of%20Learning%20-%20Observations%201-12%20PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. H. T., & Gillies, R. (2010). Designing a carefully appropriate format for formative peer-assessment for Asian students: The case of Vietnamese students. International Journal of Educational Reform, 19(2), 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 199–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M., Mavros, P., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J., & Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new took for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 50(4), 1639–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, E., Linn, M., & Koppal, M. (2008). Characterizing curriculum coherence. In Y. Kali, M. Linn, & J. Ellen (Eds.), Designing science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction and policy (pp. 13–26). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaiya, S., Shiraito, Y., Kato, J., Ide, H., Okada, K., Takano, K., & Kansaku, K. (2013). Neural correlate of human reciprocity in social interactions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 239. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamone, J., & Correa, M. (2012). The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron, 76(3), 470–485. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayler, M. (1996). Parents and schools working together. Tempo, 16(3), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlict, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 393–462. doi:10.1017/S0140525×12000660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarra, D., & Ambrosino, K. (2011). Post-secondary expectations and educational attainment. Professional School Counselling, 14(3), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2008). Curriculum for excellence: Building the curriculum 3 a framework for learning and teaching. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/building_the_curriculum_3_jms3_tcm4-489454.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2011). Curriculum for excellence: Building the curriculum 5 a framework for learning and teaching. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/BtC5Framework_tcm4-653230.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013). Education and lifelong learning research. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Research/by-topic/education-and-training
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. (2014). Revolutionize assessment: Empower students, inspire learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Suffolk County Council. (2014). Parents and schools – working together. Retrieved from http://www.suffolk.gov.uk/care-and-support/children-young-people-and-families/suffolk-parent-hub-advice-and-information-for-parents-and-carers/parents-and-schools-working-together/
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison between school communities in Australia and the USA. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(3), 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria State Government. (2009). Instructional model. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Victoria State Government, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/innovation/e5/E5_A1PosterTable4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L., Drake, S., & Beckett, D. (2010). Formative assessment: Bridging the research-practice divide. Education Canada, 50(3), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick University. (2012). Distinguishing higher order learning processes. Warwick: Learning and Development Center. Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/resource/eguides/guidelines/higher/
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). (2013). Examples of formative assessment. Retrieved from http://wvde.state.wv.us/teach21/ExamplesofFormativeAssessment.html
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2004). Assessment and the regulation of learning. Paper presented at invited symposium ‘What does it mean for classroom assessment to be valid? Reliable?’ at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, April 2004, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/WiliamAssessmentarticle_201263_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wimberly, G., & Noeth, R. (2004). Schools involving parents in early years postsecondary planning. ACT Policy Report. Iowa City, IA: ACT Office of Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/involve_parents.pdf
   Google Scholar