Learning intentions and success criteria: learners' and teachers' views

References

• Absolum, M. (2010). Clarity in the classroom: Using formative assessment to build learning-focused relationships. Auckland: Hachette NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, S. (2006). An introduction to learning outcomes. In E. Froment et al. (Eds.), EUA Bologna handbook, article B.2.3-1. Berlin: Raabe.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the Black Box University of Cambridge School of Education. Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved September 26, 2014, from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/beyond_blackbox.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved July 13, 2015, from http://www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ballet, K., & Keichtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with workload: Primary teachers' experience of intensification. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1150–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box. London: King's College.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, W. F., & Charles, M. (2010). Leading learning through assessment for learning? School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 30(3), 285–300. doi:10.1080/13632434.2010.485184
   Google Scholar
• Brill, S., & McCartney, A. (2008). Stopping the revolving door: Increasing teacher retention. Politics and Policy, 36(5), 750–774.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Professional Learning and Development, Nottingham Trent University. (2015). Guides for learning and teaching: Writing learning outcomes. Retrieved July 8, 2015, from http://www.ntu.ac.uk/cpld/document_uploads/169768.docx
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2013). Outstanding formative assessment. Oxon: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, G. (2004). Improving learning in secondary English. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). The assessment for learning strategy. Nottingham: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2014). Teachers' workload diary survey 2013. Research Report. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/285941/DFE-RR316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Assessment for Learning 8 schools project report. Retrieved July 9, 2015, from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Didau, D. (2015). What if everything you knew about education was wrong? Bancyfelin: Camarthen Crown House.
   Google Scholar
• Didau, D. (n.d.). Learning objectives and why we need 'em. Retrieved from http://www.learningspy.co.uk/learning/learning-objectives-why-we-need-em/
   Google Scholar
• Dymoke, S., & Harrison, J. (2008). Reflective teaching and learning. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. (2009). Assessment for curriculum for excellence. Strategic Vision Key Principles. Retrieved September 30, 2014, from https://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/AssessmentforCfE_tcm4-565505.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. (2010). Curriculum for excellence. Building the curriculum 5 a framework for assessment. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Florez, M. T., & Sammons, P. (2013). Assessment for learning: Effects and impact. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. Social Science Journal, 28(2), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2008). Changing assessment practice process, principles and standards. Assessment Reform Group. Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, T. (2009). Improving student achievement: A practical guide to assessment for learning. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., & Moon J. (2001). How to use learning outcomes and assessment criteria. London: SEEC.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. A. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A Carnegie corporation time to act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (1992). What's wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning – Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., & Chang, S. (2012). Teacher use of formative assessment data for English language learners. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2012, Vancouver, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectorate, education (HMIe). (2009). Learning together: Improving teaching, improving learning. Retrieved from July 10, 2015, http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/ltcfe_tcm4-712914.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, C., & Pile, K. (2010). A literature review of assessment for learning in science. Slough, Bucks: The National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). Context: Working it up, down and across. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 297–311). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2003). The uses of learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 357–368.
   Google Scholar
• James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (n.d.) Math. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gkplk3uEW4#action=share
   Google Scholar
• Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2006). Assessment is for learning – Self-assessment toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/images/AifLToolkitforschools_tcm4-396095.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. (1992). Group child interviews as a research tool. British Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 413–421.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C., & King, S. (2011). Does assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 749–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Curriculum Partnership Management Board. (2007). Assessment for learning for key stages 1 and 2. Belfast: CCEA.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2008). Assessment for learning: The impact of National Strategy support. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a Wider Conceptual Field, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2015). School Meals Data Set. Retrieved 7 July, 2015, from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/Browse/School-Education/SchoolMealsDatasets/schmeals2015.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Guest Editor's Introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 293–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (2006). On the integration of formative assessment in teaching and learning with implications for teacher education. Paper prepared for the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory and the University of Hawaii Curriculum Research and Development Group. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/SEAL
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Oxon: Routledge Taylor and Francis group.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, A. (2009). The misrepresentation of Assessment for Learning – and the woeful waste of a wonderful opportunity. Presentation at the 2009 National Conference of the Association for Achievement and Improvement through Assessment, Bournemouth 16−18 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, D. (2002). Qualitative research methods. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.
   Google Scholar