Standards as a tool for teaching and assessing cross-curricular writing

References

• Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., & Thygesen, R. (this volume). The wheel of writing. A model of the writing domain for the teaching and assessing of writing as a key competency.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. (2011). National standards revisited. New Zealand Principal, 26, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, J., & Shuker, M. J. (2014). Ben 10, superheroes and princesses: Primary teachers’ views of popular culture and school literacy. Literacy, 48, 32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, P. (1974). Measuring growth in English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, R. W., & Hilberg, R. S. (2007). Standards for effective pedagogy, classroom organization, English proficiency, and student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasting, R. B., Thygesen, R., Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., & Vagle, W. (2009). National assessment of writing. A tool for teaching and learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(6), 617–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasswell, K., & Brown, G. T. L. (2003). Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Study in large-scale scoring of asTTle writing assessments ( asTTle Technical Report 26). Auckland: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Common core state standards, writing and students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (2011). Writing assessment: Shifting issues, new tools, enduring questions. Assessing Writing, 16, 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap. How state writing assessments control learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Jølle, L. (2014). Pair assessment of pupil writing: A dialogic approach for studying the development of rater competence. Assessing Writing, 14, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jølle, L. (2015). Rater strategies for reaching agreement on pupil text quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(4), 458–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matre, S., Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., Fasting, R. B., Solheim, R., & Thygesen, R. (2011). Developing national standards for the teaching and assessment of writing. Rapport frå forprosjekt utdanning2020 [Report from a pilot project under Education 2020]. Trondheim: National Centre for Writing Education and Writing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Matre, S., & Solheim, R. (2015). Writing education and assessment in Norway: Towards shared understanding, shared language and shared responsibility. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 15, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2009). The New Zealand curriculum reading and writing standards for years 1–8. Wellington: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2015). Fremtidens skole: Fornyelse av fag og kompetanser [A school for the future: Renewing subjects and competencies] (Vol. 8). Oslo: DIFI.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2003). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations (DeSeCo). Summary of the final report: Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A. (2012). The method of adaptive comparative judgment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19, 281–300. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354
   Google Scholar
• Quality Counts 2006. National assessment of educational progress. Education Week, 23, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smaill, E. (2013). Moderating New Zealand's national standards: Teacher learning and assessment outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 250–265.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. (2013). National standards for student achievement: Is New Zealand's idiosyncratic approach any better? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36, 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Thygesen, R., & Eggen, A. B. (2015). Bridging summative and formative assessment. In D. L. Cameron & R. Thygesen (Eds.), Transitions in the field of special education: Theoretical perspectives and implications for practice. New York, NY: WAXMANN.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. School Psychology Review, 42, 343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar