Student perspectives on assessment for learning

References

• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., … Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, B., & Charles, M. (2013). Formative assessment for teaching and learning. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Harlen, W., James, M., & Stobart, G. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. (2011). Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the Students’ Conceptions of Assessment inventory. Educational Psychology, 31(6), 731–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2007). Students’ conceptions of assessment and mathematics: Self-regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2009). Use of interactive-informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2009). My teacher and my friends helped me learn. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment (pp. 85–105). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Klinger, D., Pyper, J., Shulha, L., & Woods, J. (2015). Building school district capacity in assessment for learning: A study on the effectiveness of an instructional rounds professional learning approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 122–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Luu, K., Youyi, S., & Klinger, D. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom: Barriers to implementation and possibilities for teacher professional learning. Assessment Matters, 4, 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment & Research and Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson, T. (2008). Improving student achievement through assessment for learning. Curriculum Leadership, 6(31). Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/improving_student_achievement,25374.html?issueID=11603
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2009). “Drawing” out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment (pp. 53–83). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 107–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, L., & Spencer, E. (2010). The complexities of change: Formative assessment in Scotland. Curriculum Journal, 21(2), 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland Department of Education and Skills (2012). The framework for junior cycle. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A., Volante, L., & DeLuca, C. (2012). Building teacher capacity within the evolving assessment culture in Canadian Education. Policy Futures in Education, Special Issue: Developing Sustainable Assessment Cultures in School Learning Organisations, 10(4), 447–460.
   Google Scholar
• Love, N. (2009). Building a high-performance data culture. In N. Love (Ed.), Using data to improve learning for all: A collaborative inquiry approach (pp. 2–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, D. M., Brown, G. T. L., & Liem, G. A. D. (Eds.). (2009). Student perspectives on assessment. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–161). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2011). Ministry of education position paper: Assessment (schooling sector). Wellington: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. Toronto: Queen's Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. (2009). Accessing primary pupils’ conceptions of daily classroom assessment practices. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment (pp. 25–51). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2006). Balanced assessment systems: Redefining excellence in assessment. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., Koch, M. J., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449.
   Google Scholar
• Tsivitanidou, O. E., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(4), 506–519.
   Google Scholar