Literature as aesthetic knowledge: implications for curriculum and education

References

• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of perfomativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., & Barnes, D. (1984). English and “The Real World.” In Changing English: Essays for Harold Rosen (pp. 109–118). London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, T. I. (2006). Art as symbolic form: Cassirer on the educational value of art. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(4), 51–64. doi: 10.1353/jae.2006.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (1999). Makeover or takeover? The strange death of educational autonomy in neo-liberal England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1080/01425699995425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brameld, T. (1956). Philosophical anthropology: The educational significance of Ernst Cassirer. Harvard Educational Review, 26(3), 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buesch, T. A. (1973). The literary genre as symbolic form. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(4), 525–530.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (1994). Knowledge about language in the curriculum. In Teaching English (pp. 246–258). London, New York: Routledge Falmer in association with The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms: The phenomenology of knowledge (Vol. 3). London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, E. (1979). Symbol, myth, and culture: Essays and lectures of Ernst Cassirer, 1935–1945. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, L. (2013). Art education as if for future flourishing: Three analogies between human beings and types of creative grammar. In Debates in art and design education (pp. 175–198). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1999). Prescribing teaching methods. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 33(3), 387–401. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.00144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2013). To read or not to read: Decoding synthetic phonics. Impact, 2013(20), 1–38. doi: 10.1111/2048-416X.2013.12000.x
   Google Scholar
• Dombey, H. (undated). What happened to England’s National Literacy Strategy? Books for Keeps: The Children’s Book Magazine Online. Retrieved from http://booksforkeeps.co.uk/issue/169/childrens-books/articles/other-articles/what-happened-to-england’s-national-literacy
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. L. (1970). G.H. Bantock, literature, and moral education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 4(3), 37–54. doi: 10.2307/3331365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1996). Ways of seeing: Ways of meaning. London, New York: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (1960). Objective interpretation. Publications of the Modern Languages Association of America, 463–479.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, D. (1961). English for maturity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, G. G. (1963). The dream and the task: Literature and morals in the culture of today. London: Ducksworth.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1978). The art of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kneller, J. (2007). Kant and the power of the imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, S. (1957). Problems of art: Ten philosophical lectures. New York: Charles Scribner & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, S. (1961). Reflections on art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavis, F. R. (1963). The common pursuit. Middlesex, Victoria: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. (2012). The rise and fall of meter: Poetry and English national culture, 1860–1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGilchrist, I. (1982). Against criticism. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Medway, P. (1984). Doing teaching English (pp. 134–142). London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Medway, P. (2010). English and enlightenment. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 17(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1080/13586840903556987
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (2013). Basil Bernstein: The thinker and the field. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, J. (2017). Reading between the lines: An account of the cognitive gain from literary fiction (PhD dissertation). Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed). (1979). Durkheim: essays on morals and education. London, Oxon, USA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Plowden, B. (1967). Children and their primary schools. A Report of the central advisory council for education. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Poulson, L., Avramidis, E., Fox, R., Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2001). The theoretical beliefs of effective teachers of literacy in primary schools: An exploratory study of orientations to reading and writing. Research Papers in Education, 16(3), 271–292. doi: 10.1080/02671520126827
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2009). Aesthetics and its discontents. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. (1992). The politics of writing. In New readings contributions to an understanding of literacy. (pp. 119–130). London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal Cuthbert, A. (2017). A progressive case for liberal subject-based education (based on a case study of the English literature syllabus). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sublette, J. R. (1973). The Dartmouth conference: Its reports and results. College English, 35(3), 348–357. doi: 10.2307/374999
   Google Scholar
• The English Association (1948). English Literature in Schools, 21, unpaginated.
   Google Scholar
• University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (1997). UCLES Annual Review 1997/1998. Cambridge: UCLES.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D. (2003). The national literacy strategy: A critical review of empirical evidence. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 903–916. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000137376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. (2017). The art of reading. London, Melbourne: Scribe.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2016). Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge. London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar