Learner agency and the curriculum: a critical realist perspective

References

• Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency, and the internal conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Cross-curriculum priorities - Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2014). Foundation to year 10 curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 177–193. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.767880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bown, J. (2009). Self‐regulatory strategies and agency in self‐instructed language learning: A situated view. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 570–583. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00965.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council. (2014). Basic education curriculum guide - To sustain, deepen and focus on learning to learn (Primary 1 – 6). Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/doc-reports/guide-basic-edu-curriculum/BECG_2014_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). The National Curriculum in England: Key Stages 1 and 2 framework document. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doll, R. C. (1996). Curriculum improvement: Decision-making and process (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York, NY: MacMillan College Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization (pp. 56–109). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S., & Thomson, G. (2012). Rethinking secondary education: A human-centred approach. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2017). Children's experiences of classrooms: Talking about being pupils in the classroom. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, E. A. (2008). Classroom conditions to secure enjoyment and achievement: the pupils' voice. Listening to the voice of Every child matters. Education 3-13, 36(4), 393–401. doi:10.1080/03004270801969386
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: can increasing "student voice" in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R., & Young, M. (2001). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: towards a reconceptualisation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 445–461. doi:10.1080/01425690120094421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2001). The Ontario curriculum grades 1‐8: Native languages [Program of Studies]. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/nativelang18curr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013). Creating pathways to success: An education and career/life planning program for Ontario schools. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality, education and the working classes. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). 'I'll be a nothing': structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354. doi:10.1080/0141192990250305
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. (2014). Children, their Voices and their Experiences of School: what does the evidence tell us? York: Cambridge Primary Review Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Fielding, M. (2010). Children and their primary schools: pupils' voices. In R. Alexander (Ed.), The Cambridge Primary Review Research Surveys (pp. 17–48).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2000). Curriculum: Construction and technique. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: 'carving a new order of experience'. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89. doi:10.1080/03057640050005780
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, E. P., & Rich, Y. (2011). Identity education: A new conceptual framework for researchers and practitioners. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 222–238. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.614509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Department for Education [DfE]. (2014). The Young person's guide to the Children and Families Act 2014. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/359681/Young_Person_s_Guide_to_the_Children_and_Families_Act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, D., & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds.), (2007). International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school. The Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Toohey, K., & Norton, B. (2003). Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 58–72). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• UNDES. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY: UN Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-GMR. (2014). Education for all: Global monitoring report 2014. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. (2007). Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory. In P. Benson (Ed.), Learner autonomy 8: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 5–24). Dublin: Authentik.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2018). The weakness of ‘powerful knowledge’. London Review of Education, 16(2), 325–335. doi:10.18546/LRE.16.2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., & Manyukhina, Y. (2018). Research informed analysis on the place of knowledge in a redeveloped primary curriculum: Final report. Prepared for the National Council for Curriculum & Assessment Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.ncca.ie/media/3502/seminar_two_wyse_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Millar, V. (2016). ‘Powerful knowledge’ curriculum theories and the case of physics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 298–312. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1174141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar