References
- Al-Maamari, F., Al-Aamri, K., Khammash, S., & Al-Wahaibi, M. (2017). Promoting EFL teacher research engagement through a research support programme. RELC Journal, 48(3), 389–404. doi: 10.1177/0033688216684282
- Alvunger, D. (2018). Teachers’ curriculum agency in teaching a standards-based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 479–498. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2018.1486721
- Banegas, D. L., Consoli, S. (2020). Action research in language education. In J. McKinley H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (Chapter 15). London/New York: Routledge.
- Bascia, N., Carr-Harris, S., Fine-Meyer, R., & Zurzolo, C. (2014). Teachers, curriculum innovation, and policy formation. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(2), 228–248. doi: 10.1111/curi.12044
- Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005-2014: Understanding publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006
- Brown, J. D. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Cain, T., & Harris, R. (2013). Teachers’ action research in a culture of performativity. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 343–358. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2013.815039
- Carvajal-Tapia, A. (2017). Docencia e investigación: Entre el sueño y el logro, dejando huellas en el mundo. Revista de Educación, 12, 119–126.
- Cheng, H., & Dörnyei, (2008). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153–174. doi: 10.2167/illt048.0
- Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 84–103). London/New York: Sage.
- Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: An investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244–266. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
- Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613–659. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00319.x
- Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2019). Teacher autonomy development through reading teacher research: Agency, motivation and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 253–266. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2018.1442471
- Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (Eds.) (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Elisha-Primo, I., Sandler, S., Goldfrad, K., Ferenz, O., & Perpignan, H. (2010). Listening to students’ voices: A curriculum renewal Project for an EFL graduate academic program. System, 38(3), 457–466. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.02.002
- Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41(2), 147–181. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004867
- Graves, K. (2016). Language curriculum design: Possibilities and realities. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 79–93). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
- Hanks, J. (2017). Integrating research and pedagogy: An exploratory practice approach. System, 68, 38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.06.012
- Henry, A., & Thorsen, C. (2018). Teacher–student relationships and L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 218–241. doi: 10.1111/modl.12446
- Huang, H.-T., Hsu, C.-C., & Chen, S.-W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51(1), 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.03.003
- Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. M. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2013.834077
- Islam, M., Lamb, M., & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41(2), 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.025
- Kikuchi, K. (2015). Demotivation in second language acquisition: Insights from Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 275–299. doi: 10.1002/tesq.129
- Lamb, M. (2012). A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62(4), 997–1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x
- Lamb, M. & Budiyanto, (2013). Cultural challenges, identity and motivation in state school EFL. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 18–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Lamb, T. (2004). “It depends on the students themselves”: Independent language learning at an Indonesian state school. Language, Culture, & Curriculum, 17(3), 229–245. doi: 10.1080/07908310408666695
- Lamb, T. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50(3), 301–346. doi: 10.1017/S0261444817000088
- Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.
- Norton, B. (2016). Identity and language learning: Back to the future. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 475–479. doi: 10.1002/tesq.293
- Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2013). L2 motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy: The interrelationship of individual variables in the secondary school context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 523–550. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.5
- Pinner, R. S. (2019). Authenticity and teacher-student motivational synergy: A narrative of language teaching. London/New York: Routledge.
- Rebolledo, P., Smith, R. and Bullock, D. (Eds). (2016). Champion teachers: Stories of exploratory action research. London: The British Council.
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015
- Soto, M. A. (2018). Imaginary realities: Curriculum changes that ignore classroom contexts. In M. Wedell & L. Grassick (Eds.), International perspectives on teachers living with curriculum change (pp. 205–228). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
- Taylor, F. (2013). Listening to Romanian teenagers: Lessons in motivation and ELT methodology. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 35–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Terigi, F. (1999). Curriculum. Buenos Aires: Santillana.
- Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Ushioda, E. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49(4), 564–577. doi: 10.1017/S0261444816000173
- Ushioda, E. (Ed.), (2013). International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 121–140. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
- Wedell, M., & Grassick, L. (2018). Living with curriculum change: An overview. In M. Wedell & L. Grassick (Eds.), International perspectives on teachers living with curriculum change (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Whitehead, J. (2019). The underlying importance of context and voice in action research. In C. A. Mertler (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of action research in education (pp. 207–228). London: John Wiley & Sons.
- Wood, L., McAteer, M., & Whitehead, J. (2019). How are action researchers contributing to knowledge democracy? A global perspective. Educational Action Research, 27(1), 7–21. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2018.1531044
- Xu, H., & Gao, Y. (2014). The development of English learning motivation and learners' identities: A structural equation modelling analysis of longitudinal data from Chinese universities. System, 47, 102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.020
- Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2014.902526
- Yuan, R., Sun, P., & Teng, L. (2016). Understanding language teachers’ motivations towards research. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 220–234. doi: 10.1002/tesq.279