Will you stand up in court? On the admissibility of psychiatric and psychological evidence

References

• Carson , D. 1990 . Professionals and the Courts: A Handbook for Expert Witnesses , Birmingham : Venture Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Egeth , H. E. and McCloskey , M. 1984 . “ ‘Expert Testimony about Eyewitness Behavior: Is it Safe and Effective?’ ” . In Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives , Edited by: Wells , G. L. and Loftus , E. F. New York : Cambridge University Press. . In (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , M. L. C. 1995 . ‘May I Have the Next Dance, Mrs . Tulane Law Review , 69 : 793 – 807 .
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton , I. R. 1987 . The Trial of the Expert: A Study of Expert Evidence and Forensic Experts , Melbourne : Oxford University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Haward , L. R. C. 1964 . ‘A Psychologist's Contribution to Legal Procedure’ . Modern Law Review , 27 : 656 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Hindley , G. D. and Brend , W. A. 1939 . Traumatic Mental Disorders in Courts of Law Law Quarterly Review , 55 : 152 – 3 . 1938.:
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson , T. 1990 . Expert Evidence: Law and Practice , London : Sweet & Maxwell. .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , C. A. G. 1994 . Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine and the Practice of Law , Oxford : Oxford University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• JUSTICE . 1991 . Science and the Administration of Justice , London : JUSTICE. . (chair: Judge Christopher Oddie)(.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny , A. 1983 . ‘The Expert in Court’ . Law Quarterly Review , 99 : 197 – 216 .
   Google Scholar
• Loftus , E. F. 1984 . “ ‘Expert Testimony on the Eyewitness’ ” . In Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives , Edited by: Wells , G. L. and Loftus , E. F. New York : Cambridge University Press. . In (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Mackay , R. D. and Colman , A. M. 1991 . ‘Excluding Expert Evidence: a Tale of Ordinary Folk and Common Experience’ . Criminal Law Review , : 800 – 10 .
   Google Scholar
• Moenssens , A. A. 1993 . ‘Novel Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases: Some Words of Caution’ . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 84 : 1 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Murphy , P. 1995 . Murphy on Evidence, , 5th edn , London : Blackstone .
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod , D. C. 1991 . commentary to . Weightman. Criminal Law Review , : 204 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Pattenden , R. 1986 . ‘Conflicting Approaches to Psychiatric Evidence in Criminal Trials: England, Canada and Australia’ . Criminal Law Review , : 92 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• Pizzi , W. T. 1995 . ‘Expert Testimony in the US’ . New Law Journal , : 82 – 3 . (27 January):
   Google Scholar
• Reder , P. , Lucey , C. and Fellow-Smith , E. 1993 . ‘Surviving Cross-examination in Court’ . Journal of Forensic Psychiatry , 4 : 489 – 96 .
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , P. 1994 . ‘Science in the Criminal Process’ . Oxford Journal of Legal Studies , 14 : 469 – 506 .
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , P. and Willmore , C. The Role of Forensic Science Evidence in Criminal Proceedings . 1993 . London : HMSO. . RCCJ Research Study no. 1
   Google Scholar
• Robertson , B. , Vignaux , G. A. and Egerton , I. 1994 . ‘Stylometric Evidence’ . Criminal Law Review , : 645 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon , D. H. and MacLeod , M. D. 1991 . ‘From Normative to Positive Data: Expert Psychological Evidence Re-Examined’ . Criminal Law Review , : 811 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Slovenko , R. 1993 . ‘Expert Testimony: Use and Abuse’ . Medicine and Law , 12 : 627 – 41 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tapper , C. 1990 . Cross on Evidence , Vol. 7th edn , London : Butterworth .
   Google Scholar
• Thornton , P. 1995 . ‘The Admissibility of Expert Psychiatric and Psychological Evidence’ . Medicine, Science and the Law , 35 : 143 – 9 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar