Between a rock and a hard place: corporate elites in the context of religion and secularism in Turkey

References

• AliA. J. (2010). Managing MNC-government negotiations in Saudi Arabia: The key role of elites. Journal of Promotion Management, 16, 494–521.
   Google Scholar
• AsadT. (2003). Formation of the secular. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ba¸kanF. (2010). The rising Islamic business elite and democratization in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12, 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiggartN. W., & DelbridgeR. (2004). Systems of exchange. Academy of Management Review, 29, 28–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BorgattiS. P., & HalginD. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22, 1168–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BourdieuP. (1979). La distinction: Critique Sociale Du Jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• BourdieuP. (1980). Le capital social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• BourdieuP. (2000). L'esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• BourdieuP. (2003). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• BoyatsisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• BuğraA. (1994). State and business in modern Turkey: A comparative study. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• BuğraA. (1998). Class, culture and state: An analysis of interest representation by two Turkish business associations. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30, 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuğraA. (2002). Labour, capital, and religion: Harmony and conflict among the constituency of political Islam in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 38, 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuğraA., & Sava¸kanO. (2010). Yerel Sanayi ve Bugünün Türkiye'sinde I¸ Dünyası. Toplum ve Bilim, 118, 92–123.
   Google Scholar
• BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CarrollW. K. (2008). The corporate elite and the transformation of finance capital: A view from Canada. In M.Savage & K.Williams (Eds.), Remembering Elites (pp. 44–63). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• CaseW. (2005). Malaysia: New reforms, old continuities, tense ambiguities. The Journal of Development Studies, 41, 284–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CollingsD. G., DemirbagM., MellahiK., & TatogluE. (2010). Strategic orientation, human resource management practices and organizational outcomes: Evidence from Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2589–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErcekM. (2006). HRMization in Turkey: Expanding the rhetoric-reality debate in space and time. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 648–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GauchetM. (1997). The disenchantment of the world: A political history of religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GöleN. (1991). Modern mahrem. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory. Revisited Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
   Google Scholar
• GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GranovetterM. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35, 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuillénM. F. (2001). The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GürbüzS., & MertI. S. (2011). Impact of the strategic human resource management on organizational performance: Evidence from Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1803–1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarikI. (1980). Power and the study of elites. In I. W.Zartman (Ed.), Elites in the Middle East (pp. 49–83). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• KaboubF. (2013). The end of neoliberalism? An institutional analysis of the Arab uprisings. Journal of Economic Issues, 533–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KayaN. (2006). The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: Evidence from Turkish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 2074–2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KayaN., KocE., & TopcuD. (2010). An Exploratory analysis of the influence of human resource management activities and organizational climate on job satisfaction in Turkish banks. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2031–2051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KelesS., & AycanZ. (2011). The relationship of managerial values and assumptions with performance management in Turkey: Understanding within culture variability. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 3080–3096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeymanF., & LorasdağıB. K. (2010). Kentler-Anadolu'nun Dönü¸ümü, Türkiye'nin Geleceği. İstanbul: Doğan.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbaracıba¸ıA. C. (2009). Turkish politics and the rise of the AKP – Dilemmas of institutionalization and leadership strategy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• KüsküF., & AtamanB. M. (2011). Employment interview satisfaction of applicants within the context of a developing country: The case of Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2463–2483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaçinokN. (2007). Turgut Özal. In A. F.Demir (Ed.), Türk Dı¸ Politikasında Liderler (pp. 537–639). Istanbul: Bağlam.
   Google Scholar
• La PortaR., Lopez-De-SilanesF., & ShleiferA. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origin. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 285–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeatM., & El-KotG. (2007). HRM practices in Egypt: The influence of national context?The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LounsburyM., & VentrescaM. (2003). The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10, 457–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MangoA. (2006). Religion and culture in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 42, 997–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MardinŞ. (1986). Din ve İdeoloji. İstanbul: İleti¸im Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• MardinŞ. (2004). Türkiye'de Din ve Siyaset. İstanbul: İleti¸im Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• MartinD. (1978). A general theory of secularization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• MetcalfeB. D. (2007). Gender and human resource management in the Middle East. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 54–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoliternoT. P., & MahonyD. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37, 443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyersM. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Öni¸Z. (2004). Turgut Özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern Studies, 40, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öni¸Z., & TüremU. (2001). Business, globalization and democracy: A comparative analysis of Turkish business associations. Turkish Studies, 2, 94–120.
   Google Scholar
• Öni¸Z., & TüremU. (2002). Entrepreneurs, democracy, and citizenship in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 34, 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÖzbilginM., & TatliA. (2005). Book review essay: Understanding Bourdieu's contribution to organization and management studies. Academy of Management Review, 30, 855–869.
   Google Scholar
• ÖzbilginM., & TatliA. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64, 1229–1258.
   Google Scholar
• ÖzcanG. B., & TurunçH. (2011). Economic liberalization and class dynamics in Turkey: New business groups and Islamic mobilization. Insight Turkey, 13, 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• PamukŞ. (2008). Globalization, industrialization and changing politics in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 267–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PettigrewA. (1992). On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 163–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RowleyT. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SavageM., & WilliamsK. (2008). Elites: Remembered in capitalism and forgotten by social sciences. In M.Savage & K.Williams (Eds.), Remembering elites (pp. 1–24). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• SayceS., & ÖzbilginM. F. (2014). Pension trusteeship and diversity in the UK: A new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35, 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• ScottJ. (2008). Taking stock of elites: Recognizing historical changes. In M.Savage & K.Williams (Eds.), Remembering Elites (pp. 27–43). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• SönmezM. (2010). Türkiye'de I¸ Dünyasının Örgütleri ve Yönelimleri. Istanbul: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Derneği.
   Google Scholar
• TatliA., & ÖzbilginM. F. (2012). An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: A Bourdieuan framing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TownleyB. (2002). Managing with modernity. Organization, 9, 549–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TüreF. (2008). Devlet: Liberalizmin Bir Serüveni. In R.Gönlü (Ed.), Devlet ve Sermayenin Yeni Biçimleri (pp. 73–93). Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• ÜzmezA. (2014). Türkiye'de i¸adamı dernekleri ve politik faaliyetleri:MÜSI˙AD örneği (Unpublished master thesis). Galatasaray University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• WhittingtonR. (2004). Strategy after modernism. European Management Review, 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamakS., & ErtunaB. (2012). Corporate governance and initial public offerings in Turkey. In A.Zattoni & W.Judge (Eds.), Corporate governance and initial public offerings: An international perspective (pp. 470–499). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• YamakS., ErgurA., ÜnsalA., ÖzbilginM., & ÇokerE. Ü. (2011). New Turkish business elites: Resources, networks, boundaries, and mobility. In A.Kakabadse & N.Kakabadse (Eds.), Global elites: The opaque nature of transnational policy determination (pp. 130–156). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• YılmazI. (2005). State, law, civil society and Islam in contemporary Turkey. The Muslim World, 95, 385–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YurtogluB. B. (2000). Ownership, control and performance of Turkish listed firms. Empirica, 27, 193–222.
   Google Scholar
• YurtogluB. B. (2004). Persistence of firm-level profitability in Turkey. Applied Economics, 36, 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaldM. N., & LounsburyM. (2010). The wizards of oz: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31, 963–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar