Predictors of the adoption of work–care arrangements: a study of South African firms

References

• Ayree, S. (2005). The work-family interface in urban Sub-Saharan Africa: A theoretical analysis. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international research perspective (pp. 261–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, M. (2011). The state, work and family in Australia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 3742–3754. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.622922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardoel, E. A. (2003). The provision of formal and informal work-family practices: The relative importance of institutional and resource dependent explanations versus managerial explanations. Women in Management Review, 18, 7–19. doi:10.1108/09649420310462299.
   Google Scholar
• Bardoel, E. A., Tharenou, P., & Moss, S. (1999). Organizational predictors of work-family practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 36, 31–49. doi:10.1177/103841119903600304.
   Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2002). Employee's use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80, 813–845. doi:10.1353/sof.2002.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., Honke, J., & Thauer, C. (2012). Multinational corporations, corporate responsibility and the nation state: Does it really take the state? Business and Politics, 14(3), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2004). Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57, 204–222. doi:10.2307/4126617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2006). Family-friendly work practices in Britain: Availability and perceived accessibility. Human Resource Management, 45, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2012). MNC practice transfer: Institutional theory, strategic opportunities and subsidiary HR configuration. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3813–3837. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.665068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., & Dancaster, L. (2009a). The rights of employees with family responsibilities to request flexible working arrangements: The failings of the Employment Equity Act. In O. Dupper & C. Garbers (Eds.), Equality in the workplace: Reflections from South Africa and beyond (pp. 207–226). Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., & Dancaster, L. (2009b). Family responsibility discrimination litigation: A non-starter? Stellenbosch Law Review, 20, 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Dancaster, L. (2014). State measures towards work-care integration in South Africa. In Z. Mokomane (Ed.), Work-family interface in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 177–194). Pretoria: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dancaster, L., & Baird, M. (2008). Workers with care responsibilities: Is work-family integration adequately addressed in South African labour law? Industrial Law Journal Including the Industrial Law Reports, 29, 22–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dancaster, L., & Cohen, T. (2010). Workers with family responsibilities: A comparative analysis to advocate for the legal right to request flexible working arrangements in South Africa. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 34, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. E., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2006). Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations, 33, 191–223. doi:10.1177/0730888405280446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Dulk, L. (2001). Work-family arrangements in organisations: A cross-national study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
   Google Scholar
• den Dulk, L. (2005). Workplace work-family arrangements: A study and explanatory framework of differences between organizational provisions in different welfare states. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international research perspective (pp. 211–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• den Dulk, L., Peters, P., & Poutsma, E. (2012). Variations in adoption of workplace work–family arrangements in Europe: The influence of welfare-state regime and organizational characteristics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2785–2808. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.676925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Labour. (2012). Code of good practice on HIV and AIDS in the world of work  (Govt. Gazette No. 35435).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Labour (DOL). (2000). Code of good practice on key aspects of HIV and AIDS in employment  (Govt. Gazette No. 21815).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Social Development (DSD). (2011). Green paper on families: Promoting family life and strengthening families in South Africa  (Govt. Gazette No. 34657).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Social Development (DSD). (2012). Draft white paper on families in South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.dsd.gov.za.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. (2004). Corporate South Africa's response to HIV/AIDS: Why so slow? Journal of South African Studies, 30, 627–650. doi:10.1080/0305707042000254137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, J. B., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136. doi:10.2307/1388226.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401–1440. doi:10.1086/229459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195–219. doi:10.1108/10662240510590360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fig, D. (2005). Manufacturing amnesia: Corporate social responsibility in South Africa. International Affairs, 81, 599–617. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambles, R., Lewis, S., & Rapoport, R. (2006). The myth of work-life balance: The challenge of our time for men, women and societies. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies. Work and Occupations, 22, 380–411. doi:10.1177/0730888495022004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382. doi:10.2307/256833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granello, H. G., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counselling and Development, 82, 387–393. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heymann, J., Earle, A., & Hanchate, A. (2004). Bringing a global perspective to community, work and family: An examination of extended work hours in families in four countries. Community, Work and Family, 7, 247–272. doi:10.1080/1366880042000245506.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1466–1482. doi:10.2307/256866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labour Research Service (LRS). (2011). The trade union bargaining indicators report, 2011. Bargaining monitor, 25(176), 1–43. Retrieved from http://www.lrs.org.za.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a work-life balance approach: An international perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 360–373. doi:10.1080/09585190601165577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, F. (2010). Hierarchies of care work in South Africa: Nurses, social workers and home-based care workers. International Labour Review, 149, 495–509. doi:10.1111/j.1564-913X.2010.00100.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makina, A. (2009). Caring for people with HIV: State policies and their dependence on women's unpaid work. Gender and Development, 17, 309–319. doi:10.1080/13552070903009684.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, H., & Milliken, F. J. (1992). Keys to action: Understanding differences in organizations' responsiveness to work-and-family issues. Human Resource Management, 31, 227–248. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930310308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterman, P. (1995). Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 681–700. doi:10.2307/2393758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelmans, S. A., Chinchilla, N., & Cardona, P. (2003). The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies: Competing for scarce resources in the labour market. International Journal of Manpower, 24, 128–147. doi:10.1108/01437720310475394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekings, J., & Moore, E. (2013). Kin, market and state in the provision of care in South Africa  (Centre for Social Science Research Working Paper No. 327). Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Sibande, S. (2013). South Africa: Trade unions still have a ‘male face’. Retrieved from http://www.genderlinks.org.za.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa (SSA). (2012). Quarterly labour force survey  (Quarter 1). Retrieved from http://www.statssa.gov.za.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, G. (2012). Women in senior management: Still not enough  (Grant Thornton International Business Report). Retrieved from http://www.gt.co.za.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalisation of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organisation studies (pp. 175–190). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, G., Haynes, M., Macdonald, F., & Arts, D. (2007). Reassessing the family friendly workplace: Trends and influences in Britain, 1998–2004. London: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, G., & Zetlin, D. (1999). Family friendly policies: Distribution and implementation in Australian workplaces. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 10, 221–239. doi:10.1177/103530469901000205.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. J., de Menezes, L. M., & Lasaosa, A. (2003). Family-friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives. Industrial Relations, 42, 221–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar