Leader prototypicality moderates the relation between access to flexible work options and employee feelings of respect and leader endorsement

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Douglas, S. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 195–208. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00517-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42, 189–220. doi:10.1111/1468-232X.00287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464. doi:10.1037/a0013935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. L. (1998). Effects of leader support in the work unit on the relationship between work spillover and family adaptation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 25–52.10.1023/A:1022985107541
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397–409. doi:10.2307/256835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clear, F., & Dickson, K. (2005). Teleworking practice in small and medium-sized firms: Management style and worker autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20, 218–233. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Brebels, L., & Hoogervorst, N. (2008). Motivation to cooperate in organisations: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157–175. doi:10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2011). Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 452–474.10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organisational commitment and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexible work arrangements: The fact sheet. (2010). Workplace flexibility 2010. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Law Center. Retrieved from: http://workplaceflexibility2010.org/images/uploads/FWA_FactSheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., & Sakai, K. (2008). National study of employers. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2009). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 434–451. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them? American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1157–1178.10.1177/00027640121956700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. Retrieved from: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-leadership-quarterly/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2013). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henly, J. R., Shaefer, H. L., & Waxman, E. (2006). Nonstandard work schedules: Employer‐ and employee‐driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review, 80, 609–634.10.1086/508478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, E. P. (1964). Leaders, groups, and influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 655–664.10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106. doi:10.1177/0018726709349199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilji, S., & Wang, X. (2006). ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1171–1189.10.1080/09585190600756384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knies, E., & Leisink, P. (2014). Linking people management and extra-role behaviour: Results of a longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Journal, 24, 57–76. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, S., & Lipponen, J. (2015). A leader’s procedural justice, respect and extra-role behaviour: The roles of leader in-group prototypicality and identification. Social Justice Research, 28, 187–206. doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0243-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2010). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Lewis, S., & Hammer, L. B. (2010). Work–life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3–19.10.1177/0018726709352385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A. D., Marler, J. H., & Gueutal, H. G. (2008). Individual differences: Factors affecting employee utilization of flexible work arrangements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambort, S. J., & Haley-Lock, A. (2004). The organizational stratification of opportunities for work-life balance: Addressing issues of equality and social justice in the workplace. Community, Work & Family, 7, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, M. L., Park, T.-Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1407–1428.10.5465/amj.2010.0651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M., & Jones, S. (2008). Networked workers. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/pub/966/networkedworkers
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605.10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. K., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Brown, M., & Matz-Costa, C. (2012). Access to and utilization of flexible work options. Industrial Relations, 51, 936–965. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindl, J. R., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 91–109.10.2307/255897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508–1519. doi:10.1177/01461672012711011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563. doi:10.1177/014920630002600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. N., & Mainiero, L. A. (1999). Managerial decision making regarding alternative work arrangements. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 41–56.10.1348/096317999166482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17, 3–20.10.1111/hrmj.2007.17.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. S. (1992). The flexible workplace: What have we learned? Human Resource Management, 31, 183–199.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., & Kossek, E. E. (2008). Work-life policy implementation: Breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness? Human Resources Management, 47, 95–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63–113.10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups: An exploration into conformity and deviation of adolescents. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2010). Work-life balance perspectives of marketing professionals in generation Y. Services Marketing Quarterly, 31, 434–447.10.1080/15332969.2010.510724
   Google Scholar
• Solnet, D., Kralj, A., & Kandampully, J. (2012). Generation Y employees: An examination of work attitude differences. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 17, 36–54. Retrieved from http://www.huizenga.nova.edu/Jame/
   Google Scholar
• Stavrou, E. T. (2005). Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A cross-national study of the European work context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 923–947.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanberg, J. E., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Drescher-Burke, K. (2005). A question of justice: Disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 866–895.10.1177/0192513X05277554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S. M. B., & Bagger, J. (2011). Working in Pajamas: Telecommuting, unfairness sources, and unfairness perceptions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 248–276. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00082.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (25th ed.). (pp. 115–191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 813–838. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00031-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 235–244. doi:10.1037/a0012936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Office of Personnel Management. (2014). Federal employee viewpoint survey results: Employees influencing change. Washington, DC: United States Office of Personnel Management. Retrieved from: www.fedview.opm/gov/2014files/2014_Governmentwide_Management_Report.PDF
   Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1078–1091. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., & Eckloff, T. (2013). Why follow? The interplay of leader categorization, identification, and feeling respected. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 68–86. doi:10.1177/1368430212461834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1988). Subordinates’ endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma: An equity theoretical approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 151–168. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(88)90049-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar