Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: the role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity

References

• Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2005). Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: Insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 791–808.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1343–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48, 732–755.10.1108/00251741011043902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.10.1348/096317999166789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 9–32.10.1080/135943299398410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1992). Multifactor leadership questionnaire-short form 6s. Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758.10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., & Scapolan, A. (2014). The individual side of ambidexterity: Do individuals’ perceptions match actual behaviors in reconciling the exploration and exploitation trade-off? European Management Journal, 32, 392–405.10.1016/j.emj.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J. (1978). Leadership: Transformational leadership, transactional leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781–796.10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Zhang, H. (2010). Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1272–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207–218.10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. (2011). How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 399–411.10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. Y., LIN, H. C., & Chien, S. H. (2009). Transformational leadership and team behavioral integration: The mediating role of team learning. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6.10.5465/AMBPP.2009.44251829
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(rev.ed.) Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524–540.10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, P. A. & Dierk, U. (2010). The ambidextrous organization: Integrating managers, entrepreneurs and leaders. Journal of Business Strategy, 31, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351–1374.10.1111/joms.2012.49.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (2011). Invited editorial: Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. Journal of Management, 37, 1413–1428.10.1177/0149206310390218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, M. A., Walters, B. A., & Olson, B. J. (2002). Top management team risk taking propensities and firm performance: Direct and moderating effects. Journal of Business Strategies, 19, 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D.-R., & Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, J., Weng, Q., & Xie, F. (2012). Leadership, team and decision speed: Empirical study using cross-provincial data. Chinese Management Studies, 6, 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havermans, L. A., Den Hartog, D. N., Keegan, A., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2015). Exploring the role of leadership in enabling contextual ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54, s179–s200.10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49, 917–946.10.1177/001872679604900703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–339.10.2307/2391905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., Bell, R. C., & Cheng, K. (2002). Transformational leadership and organizational effectiveness in recreational sports/fitness programs. The Sport Journal, 5, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y., & Huang, S. (2011). Top management team characteristics, decision-making style, and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 12099–12107.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 982–1007.10.1111/joms.2008.45.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797–811.10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannadhasan, M., & Nandagopal, R. (2010). Influence of decision makers’ characteristics on risk analysis in strategic investment decisions. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Koene, B. A. S., Vogelaar, A. L. W., & Soeters, J. L. (2002). Leadership effects on organizational climate and financial performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 193–215.10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00103-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 334–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25, 385–400.10.1111/deci.1994.25.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1123–1134.10.2307/3069392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-E., & McDonough, E. F., III (2011). Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., & Lubatkin, M. H. (2008). Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO–TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 557–576.10.5465/AMJ.2008.32626023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 812–828.10.1287/orsc.1090.0427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36, 5–39.10.1177/0149206309347376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 5–22.10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 324–338.10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., Sims, H. P., Jr., Cox, J. F., Ball, G., Schnell, E., Smith, K. A., & Trevino, L. (2003). Transactors, transformers and beyond: A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership Journal of Management Development, 22, 273–307.
   Google Scholar
• Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 561–581.10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00144-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695.10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974.10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. (2015). Principles and applications of multilevel modeling in human resource management research. Human Resource Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/hrm.21666
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597–624.10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 69–84.10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirén, C. A., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 18–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G. S., Van De Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 715–727.10.2307/30040663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. F. E. (2005). The role of risk in making decisions under escalation situations. Applied Psychology, 54, 584–607.10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Heinen, B., & Shuffler, M. (2009). Team leadership and team effectiveness. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., & Klimoski, R. (2002). The interface of leadership and team processes. Group & Organization Management, 27, 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451–483.10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 24–46.10.1002/jocb.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self-reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 813–820.10.1111/joop.2014.87.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar