Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need?

References

• Abstein, A., & Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM meta-features that foster employees’ innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work-life conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 211–225. doi:10.1111/caim.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammad, M. F., Lee, S. M., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioral ambidexterity: The impact of incentive schemes on productivity, motivation, and performance of employees in commercial banks. Human Resource Management, 54, S45–S62. doi:10.1002/hrm.21668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter, M. J. (1982). Fawlty towers: A Reversal theory analysis of a popular television comedy series. The Journal of Popular Culture, 16, 128–138. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3840.1982.1603_128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 287–298. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N. R., Erez, M., & Farr, J. L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 305–337.10.1111/iops.2009.2.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and human resource management (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caniëls, M. C. J., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 184–196. doi:10.1111/caim.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1958). Proposals leading to analytic treatment of social perception scores. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 353–379). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2012). Job design and innovative work behavior. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 8, 5–20. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2203457
   Google Scholar
• Devloo, T., Anseel, F., & De Beuckelaer, A. (2011). Do managers use feedback seeking as a strategy to regulate demands–abilities misfit? The moderating role of implicit person theory Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 453–465. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613. doi:10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, N., Ma, Q., Bosak, J., & Flood, P. (2015). Exploring the relationships between HPWS, organizational ambidexterity and firm performance in Chinese professional service firms. Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, 6, 52–70. doi:10.1108/JCHRM-09-2014-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaus, C., Güttel, W. H., Konlechner, S., Koprax, I., Lackner, H., Link, K., & Müller, B. (2015). Bridging knowledge in ambidextrous HRM systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1045007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226. doi:10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672. doi:10.2307/256741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. doi:10.1348/096317900167038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 299–312. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32, 236–256. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.23464060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 65–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. T., Stachowski, A. A., & Haynes, B. A. (2008). Middle response functioning in Likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 251–259. doi:10.1007/s10869-008-9064-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., LaPointe, J. A., & Fisicaro, S. A. (1994). Tests of three causal models of halo rater error. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 83–96. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Teachout, M. S., & Donnelly, T. M. (1992). Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 437. doi:http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.43710.1037/0021-9010.77.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109–155. doi:10.1080/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 1865–1883. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, E., & Collins, C. J. (2011). High-commitment HR practices, employee effort, and firm performance: Investigating the effects of HR practices across employee groups within professional services firms. Human Resource Management, 50, 341–363. doi:10.1002/hrm.20429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., Fourné, S. P., & Jansen, J. J. (2015). Managers’ work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 54, S133–S153. doi:10.1002/hrm.21663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 910–931. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00697.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 812–828. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633–662.10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1420–1442. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, I. M., & Pilar Pérez Santana, M (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51, 189–211. doi:10.1002/hrm.21463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 263–280. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409. doi:10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., Argote, L., & Brooks, D. (2005). Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51, 869–881. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenendaal, A. A. R. (2015). Enhancing innovation at work through human resource management. University of Twente, Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2014). Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1–25. doi:10.1002/jocb.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar