Exploring the role of task-related trust in intra-organisational knowledge sharing

References

• Abili, K., Thani, F. N., Mokhtarian, F., & Rashidi, M. M. (2011). The role of effective factors on organizational knowledge sharing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1701–1706.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.415
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2000). Social indentity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 1101–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. (1996). Localized knowledge percolation processes and information networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6, 281–295.10.1007/BF01193634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 23–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, H. (2014). Global integration and innovation: Multicountry knowledge generation within MNCs. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 869–890.10.1002/smj.2014.35.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M. (2013). Intra-organisational knowledge sharing. A holistic approach to the management of knowledge. Bremen: Europaeischer Hochschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Block, M., & Khvatova, T. (2014). Developing an interactive view on intra-organisational knowledge sharing. In C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 124–129). Reading, UK: ACPI.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G., & Draper, N. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G., & Wilson, K. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y., & Jackson, S. E. (2011). Co-worker trust and knowledge creation: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 65–83.10.1080/21515581.2011.552425
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Kerrin, M. (2003). Human resource management and knowledge management: Enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 1027–1045.10.1080/0958519032000124641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 107–128.10.1080/08985620410001677835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2006). The contingency theory of organizational design: Challenges and opportunities. In Organization design. The evolving state-of-the-art (Vol. 6, pp. 19–40). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliseeva, I. I. (2005). Экoнoмeтpикa, 2-e издaниe, Москва: Финансы и Статистика (Econometrics) (2nd ed.). Moscow: Finance and Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A theory of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149–190). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Huysman, M., & de Wit, D. (2002). Knowledge sharing in practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2003). Measuring the benefits of knowledge management at the financial services authority: A case study. Journal of Information Science, 29, 475–487.10.1177/0165551503296005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K. U., Pihlanto, P., & Vanharanta, H. (2003). Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 1–32.10.1207/s15327906mbr2901_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak-Berecka, M., Waśko, A., Kordowska-Wiater, M., Targoński, Z., & Kubik-Komar, A. (2011). Application of response surface methodology to enhancement of biomass production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus E/N. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 42, 1485–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polany, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. (1979). Technological innovation, entrepreneurship and strategy. Sloan Management Review, 20, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, E., & Edwards, J. S. (2014). Knowledge management in support of enterprise risk management. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 10, 43–61.10.4018/IJKM
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., & Sharma, A. (2012). Application of response surface methodology to the modeling of cellulase purification by solvent extraction. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 408–416.10.4236/abb.2012.34058
   Google Scholar
• Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617–640.10.1111/isj.2008.18.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2003). Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 13, 60–75.10.1111/hrmj.2003.13.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Sveiby, K. E., & Lloyd, T. (1987). Managing know-how: Add value by valuing creativity. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliaventi, R., Bertolotti, F., & Macrì, D. M. (2010). A perspective on practice in interunit knowledge sharing. European Management Journal, 28, 331–345.10.1016/j.emj.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.10.2307/257085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A., & Delbecq, A. (1974). A task contingent model of work-unit structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, B., & Albers, J. A. (2006). Knowledge management in an accounting organization. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 7, no pages. Retrieved from http://www.tlainc.com/articl123.htm
   Google Scholar
• Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2007). Knowledge sharing in public sector organizations: The effect of organizational characteristics on interdepartmental knowledge sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 581–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. (1958). Management and technology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoke, C. Y. (2012). Contingent worker, permanent loser? – How perceived trust shapes communication between contingent workers and standard workers in knowledge based organisations. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 172–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ximénez, M. C. (2000). Application of response surface methodology to the study of person-organization fit. Psicothema, 12, 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, M. H. (1999). Knowledge and strategy. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar