Differences that matter: hiring modes and demographic (dis)similarity in executive selection

References

• Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2002). The impact of the top management team's international business experience on the firm's internationalization: Social networks at work. Management International Review, 42, 157–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, N., & Hoque, K. (2005). HRM in the SME sector: valuable employees and coercive networks. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1976–1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2013). Positive effects of aging and age diversity in innovative companies – large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, D. D., & Lawless, M. W. (1998). Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organization Science, 9, 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20, 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, D. B. (1999). Employers` use of history data in making hiring decisions: The tenuous balance between rewards, commitments, and costs. Sociological Forum, 14, 583–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics on organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeker, W., & Wiltbank, R. (2005). New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organization Science, 16, 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C., van Olffen, W., van Witteloostuijn, A., & de Brabander, B. (2004). The genesis of top management team diversity: Selective turnover among top management teams in Dutch newspaper publishing. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 633–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, R., Chen, Q., Engel, E., & Smith, A. (2004). Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 167–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, D. & Edwards, J.R., (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 822–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A. Jr., & Georgakakis, D. (2017). Decision diversion: The roles of leadership context and other contingencies. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 428–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A. Jr., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model. In F. Dansereau & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Multilevel issues in strategy and methods (Vol. 4, pp. 195–237). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A. Jr., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 768–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications for strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533–545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Wade, J. B. (2002). Microlevel opportunity structures as determinants of non-CEO executive pay. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1085–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaganti, R., & Sambharya, R. (1987). Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 393–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. M. (1990). A market performance comparison of U.S. firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 2, 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42, 693–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1999). Cognitive biases and strategic decision processes: An integrative perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 757–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 57, 1951–1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1072–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., (2008). The person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 167–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, L. (2017). Data collection in the field of ethnicity. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, D., Greve, P., & Ruigrok, W. (2017). Top management team faultlines and firm performance: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 741–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, D., & Ruigrok, W. (2017). CEO succession origin and firm performance: A multilevel study. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 58–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P., & Vantrappen, H. (2015). How global is your C-suite? Sloan Management Review, 56, 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, P., Biemann, T., & Ruigrok, W. (2015). Foreign executive appointments: A multilevel examination. Journal of World Business, 50, 674–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, W. (2007). Intra-industry succession, competitive dynamics, and firm performance: Through the knowledge transfer lens. Journal of Managerial Issues, 54, 340–361.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, D. E., Michie, J., Conway, N. and Sheehan, M. (2003). Human resource management and corporate performance in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. P., & Datta, D. K. (1997). Contextual influences on executive selection: Firm characteristics and CEO experience. Journal of Management Studies, 34, 537–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. (2005). Executives sometimes lose it, just like the rest of us. Academy of Management Review, 30, 503–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO's tenure. Academic Management Review, 16, 719–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Journal, 15, 514–535.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., Currall, S., & Hammer, T. (2017). Decision diversion in diverse teams: Findings from inside a corporate boardroom. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 358–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyden, M. L. M., van Doorn, S., Reimer, M., van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H. (2013). Perceived environmental dynamism, relative competitive performance, and top management team heterogeneity: Examining correlates of upper echelons’ advice seeking. Organization Studies, 34, 1327–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyden, M. L. M., Reimer, M., & van Doorn, S. (2017). Innovating beyond the horizon: CEO career horizon, top management team composition, and R&D intensity. Human Resource Management, 56, 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyden, M. L. M., Sidhu, J., & Volberda, H. (2015). The conjoint influence of top and middle management characteristics on management innovation. Journal of Management, 44, 1505–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1987). Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Academy of Management Review, 12, 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, G. P. (2009). Executive selection – what’s right… and what’s wrong. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 704–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., Stone, V., & Alvarez, E. (1993). Socialization amidst diversity: The impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 45–109). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (1988). Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Karaevli, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1267–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, S. L., & Tushman, M. L. (1993). Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1314–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R. J., & Koles, K. L. K. (2001). The chief executive officer and top management team interface. In Zaccaro, S. J. & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), The Nature of Organizational Leadership (pp. 219–269). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, R. (2017). Being the CEO’s boss: An examination of board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 697–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof, A.L., (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review and its conceptualizations, measurement and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person-environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), American Psychological Association Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N., & Pursell, E. D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 550–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1987). Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveen, L. (2006). Organizational complexity and succession planning. Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis, 41, 661–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. (2009). Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity. Strategic Organization, 7, 277–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehmichen, J., Heyden, M., Georgakakis, D., & Volberda, H. (2017). Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge intensive firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, A. Y., Seo, J., Choi, D., & Hom, P. W. (2017). When can humble top executives retain middle managers? The moderating role of top management team faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1915–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, J. M., & Wezel, F. C. (2010). Faraway, yet so close: Organizations in demographic flux. Organization Science, 21, 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, T., & Saporta, I. (2004). The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 852–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., Liljenquist, K. A., & Neale, M. A. (2009). Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 336–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2012). When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 834–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, O. C., Shelor R. (2002). Linking top management team age heterogeneity to firm performance: Juxtaposing two mid-range theories. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 958–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberto, M. A. (2003). The stable core and dynamic periphery in top management teams. Management Decision, 41, 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., & Greve, P. (2008). The rise of an international market for executive labour. In L. Oxelheim & C. Wihlborg (Eds.), Markets and compensation for executives in Europe (pp. 53–78). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., Ganster, D. C., & Jones, J. (1998). Organization and occupation influences in the attraction-selection-attrition process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 869–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2002). Dispositional similarity, group homogeneity and organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1120–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semadeni, M., Withers, M. C., & Certo, S. T. (2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1070–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong, J., Kristof-Brown A., Park, W., Hong, D., & Shin, Y. (2015). Person-Group fit: Diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management, 41, 1184–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. Jr.(2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impact on successor type, post succession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 717–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37, 1262–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26, 1157–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D. & O’Reilly, C. A. III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuggle, C., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 550–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., & Marsman, I. (2008). How international are executive boards of European MNCs? Nationality diversity in 15 European countries. European Management Journal, 26, 188–198.
   Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A Missing link in person-environment fit. Human Resource Management, 40, 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, D. H., & Lin, Z. J. (2014). Beyond CEO tenure: The effect of CEO newness on strategic changes. Journal of Management, 40, 2009–2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 64–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2004). When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedences and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 483–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2008). Information asymmetry and the dismissal of newly appointed CEOs: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 859–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. & Qu, H. (2016). The impact of CEO succession with gender change on firm performance and successor early departure: Evidence from China’s publicly listed companies 1997-2010. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1845–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar