1,044
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

High involvement work systems and organizational performance: the role of knowledge combination capability and interaction orientation

, &
Pages 1566-1590 | Received 30 May 2017, Accepted 22 Aug 2018, Published online: 30 Dec 2018

Reference

  • Agarwal, R., & Ferratt, T. W. (1999). Coping with labor scarcity in IT: Strategies and prac-tices for effective recruitment and retention. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex.
  • Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001). Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 347–366.
  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). Human resources strategies, complementarities, and firm performance. Buffalo, NY: SUNY.
  • Benson, G. S., Young, S. M., & Lawler, E. E. III (2006). High‐involvement work practices and analysts' forecasts of corporate earnings. Human Resource Management, 45, 519–537.
  • Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (1999). Effective training: Strategies, systems, and practices. Upper Sadle River, NJ.
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high‐performance work systems: progressing the high‐involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 3–23.
  • Camelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: The mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1442–1463.
  • Camps, J., & Luna-Arocas, R. (2009). High involvement work practices and firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1056–1077.
  • Cappelli, P., & Neumark, D. (2001). Do “high-performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? ILR Review, 54, 737–775.
  • Carmeli, A., & Azeroual, B. (2009). How relational capital and knowledge combination capability enhance the performance of work units in a high technology industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 85–103.
  • Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 665–680.
  • Chen, Y. C., Li, P. C., & Evans, K. R. (2012). Effects of interaction and entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance: Insights into market driven and market driving. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1019–10.
  • Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544–560.
  • Collings, D. G., Demirbag, M., Mellahi, K., & Tatoglu, E. (2010). Strategic orientation, human resource management practices and organizational outcomes: evidence from Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2589–2613.
  • De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 379–398.
  • Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 463–483.
  • Edwards, P., & Wright, M. (2001). High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: The strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 568–585.
  • Gomolski, B. (2000). Management update: Tips to identify successful candidates for telecommuting. InSide Gartner Group, 1–12.
  • Gong, Y., Chang, S., & Cheung, S. Y. (2010). High performance work system and collective OCB: A collective social exchange perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 20, 119–137.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
  • Guerrero, S., & Barraud-Didier, V. (2004). High-involvement practices and performance of French firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1408–1423.
  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of management Journal, 44, 180–190.
  • Guthrie, J. P., Spell, C. S., & Nyamori, R. O. (2002). Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: The role of competitive strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 183–197.
  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.
  • James, L., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
  • Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39, 1699–1724.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1264–1294.
  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.
  • Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 39, 366–391.
  • Klaas, B. S., Semadeni, M., Klimchak, M., & Ward, A. K. (2012). High‐performance work system implementation in small and medium enterprises: A knowledge‐creation perspective. Human Resource Management, 51, 487–510.
  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236.
  • Kochan, T., & Osterman, P. (1994). The mutual gains enterprise: Forging a winning partnership among labor, management and government. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Lawler, E. E. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lawler, E. E. III, (1986). High-involvement management. Participative strategies for improving organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the Fortune 1000: The CEO report. Jossey-Bass.
  • Lepak, D. P., Taylor, M. S., Tekleab, A. G., Marrone, J. A., & Cohen, D. J. (2007). An examination of the use of high‐investment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 223–246.
  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.
  • MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. ILR Review, 48, 197–221.
  • María Ruiz-Jiménez, J., & del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2013). Knowledge combination, innovation, organizational performance in technology firms. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113, 523–540.
  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3, 546–562.
  • O’Neill, O. A., Feldman, D. C., Vandenberg, R. J., DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2011). Organizational achievement values, high‐involvement work practices, and business unit performance. Human Resource Management, 50, 541–558.
  • Ouyang, C., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Organizational and regional influences on the adoption of high-involvement human resource systems in China: Evidence from service establishments. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 2058–2074.
  • Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32, 326–357.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Perspectives, 13, 37–48.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
  • Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72, 27–45.
  • Richardson, H. A., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2005). Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 561–589.
  • Riordan, C. M., Vandenberg, R. J., & Richardson, H. A. (2005). Employee involvement climate and organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 44, 471–488.
  • Rodwell, J. J., Kienzle, R., & Shadur, M. A. (1998). The relationship among work‐related perceptions, employee attitudes, and employee performance: The integral role of communications. Human Resource Management, 37, 277–293.
  • Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 150–163.
  • Shih, H. A., Chiang, Y. H., & Hsu, C. C. (2010). High involvement work system, work–family conflict, and expatriate performance–examining Taiwanese expatriates in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2013–2030.
  • Tan, J., & Litsschert, R. J. (1994). Environment‐strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 1–20.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
  • Tracey, J. B. (2012). A contextual, flexibility-based model of the HR-firm performance relationship. Management Decision, 50, 909–924.
  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121.
  • Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152–173.
  • Wood, S., & De Menezes, L. (1998). High commitment management in the UK: Evidence from the workplace industrial relations survey, and employers' manpower and skills practices survey. Human Relations, 51, 485–515.
  • Wood, S., & de Menezes, L. M. (2008). Comparing perspectives on high involvement management and organizational performance across the British economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 639–683.
  • Wood, S., Van Veldhoven, M., Croon, M., & de Menezes, L. M. (2012). Enriched job design, high involvement management and organizational performance: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and well-being. Human Relations, 65, 419–445.
  • Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295–320.
  • Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27, 701–721.
  • Yang, Y. C. (2012). High-involvement human resource practices, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Service Industries Journal, 32, 1209–1227.
  • Youndt, M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Intellectual capital and organizational performance: A resource-based view approach. Annual International Conference of The Strategic Management Society Orlando.
  • Zaim, H., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2007). Performance of knowledge management practices: A causal analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 54–67.
  • Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 293–317.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.