1,500
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Supporting and retaining employees with rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of workplace social support

&

References

  • ACAS. (2017). Disability discrimination: Key points for the workplace. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/s/k/Disability_discrim_keypoints_workplace_Nov.pdf
  • Ariëns, G. A., Bongers, P. M., Hoogendoorn, W. E., Houtman, I. L., van der Wal, G., & van Mechelen, W. (2001). High quantitative job demands and low coworker support as risk factors for neck pain: Results of a prospective cohort study. Spine, 26(17), 1896–1901.
  • Barbee, A. P., Cunningham, M. R., Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., Gulley, M. R., Yankeelov, P. A., & Druen, P. B. (1993). Effects of gender role expectations on the social support process. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 175–190.
  • Black, C. M. (2008). Working for a healthier tomorrow: Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population. The Stationery Office.
  • Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behaviour: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 70–82.
  • Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., & Swader, W. M. (2005). Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 476–489.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Burton, W., Morrison, A., Maclean, R., & Ruderman, E. (2006). Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis. Occupational Medicine, 56(1), 18e27–18e27.
  • Chamberlain, L. J., & Hodson, R. (2010). Toxic work environments: What helps and what hurts. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 455–477.
  • Codd, Y., Stapleton, T., Veale, D. J., FitzGerald, O., & Bresnihan, B. (2010). A qualitative study of work participation in early rheumatoid arthritis. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 24–33.
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680.
  • Collins, A. M., & Cartwright, S. (2012). Why come into work ill? Individual and organizational factors underlying presenteeism. Employee Relations, 34(4), 429–442.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
  • Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516.
  • Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2015a). Getting the most out of the fit note: Guidance for employers and line managers.
  • Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2015b). Fit for work guidance.
  • Ducharme, L. J., & Martin, J. K. (2000). Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: A test of the buffering hypothesis. Work and Occupations, 27(2), 223–243.
  • Dunstan, D. A., & MacEachen, E. (2013). Bearing the brunt: Co-workers’ experiences of work reintegration processes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(1), 44–54.
  • Gewurtz, R., & Kirsh, B. (2009). Disruption, disbelief and resistance: A meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace. Work (Reading, Mass.), 34(1), 33–44.
  • GOV.UK. (2015). Access to work. Retrieved November 24, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2004). Working together to prevent sickness absence becoming job loss. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/web02.pdf
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2009). How to tackle work-related stress: a guide for employers on making the Management Standards work. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg430.pdf
  • Holland, P., & Clayton, S. (2019). Navigating employment retention with a chronic health condition: A meta-ethnography of the employment experiences of people with musculoskeletal disorders in the UK. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1519041
  • Holland, P., & Collins, A. M. (2018). “Whenever I can I push myself to go to work”: A qualitative study of experiences of sickness presenteeism among workers with rheumatoid arthritis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(4), 404–413.
  • Holloway, I., Sofaer-Bennett, B., & Walker, J. (2007). The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(18), 1456–1464.
  • Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 25(16), 2114–2125.
  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and perceived social support. Addison-Wesley.
  • Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta‐analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.
  • Lysaght, R. M., & Larmour-Trode, S. (2008). An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work (Reading, Mass.), 30(3), 255–266.
  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
  • Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 876–890.
  • Nahum-Shani, I., & Bamberger, P. A. (2011). Explaining the variable effects of social support on work-based stressor–strain relations: The role of perceived pattern of support exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 49–63.
  • National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS). (2007). I want to work.
  • National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS). (2014a). What is rheumatoid arthritis? Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.nras.org.uk/what-is-ra-article
  • National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS). (2014b). Invisible disease: Rheumatoid arthritis and chronic fatigue survey.
  • Oksanen, T., Kouvonen, A., Vahtera, J., Virtanen, M., & Kivimäki, M. (2010). Prospective study of workplace social capital and depression: Are vertical and horizontal components equally important? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health , 64(8), 684–689.
  • Shaw, W. S., Tveito, T. H., & Boot, C. R. (2013). Introduction to the special section: Sustainability of work with chronic health conditions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(2), 157–161.
  • Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542–548.
  • Sloan, M. M., Evenson Newhouse, R. J., & Thompson, A. B. (2013). Counting on coworkers: Race, social support and emotional experiences on the job. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(4), 343–372.
  • Tipping, S., Chanfreau, J., Perry, J., Tait, C. (2012). The Fourth work-life balance employee survey: main findings. Employment Relations Research Series 122. Department for Business Innovation & Skills. Retrieved October 27, 2017, from http://doc.ukdataservice.ac.uk/doc/7112/mrdoc/pdf/7112_technical_report.pdf
  • Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966.
  • Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? The Stationery Office
  • Williams-Whitt, K., the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention, Bültmann, U., Amick, B., Munir, F., Tveito, T. H., & Anema, J. R. (2016). Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: A comparison of scientific literature, grey literature and stakeholder observations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 26(4), 417–433.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.