Team-level high-performance work systems, self-efficacy and creativity: differential moderating roles of person–job fit and goal difficulty

References

• Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person-situation interactions. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1615–1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00594.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43, 41–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organisations. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 10, 123–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organisations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Bailey, T. A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. B., & Boyles, T. (2007). Validating the human resource system structure: A levels-based strategic HRM approach. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y., & Otaye, L. E. (2012). Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages . The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organisational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-hall.
   Google Scholar
• Batt, R., & Colvin, A. J. (2011). An employment systems approach to turnover: Human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64869448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organisational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organisations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: Examining the role of person– organisation and person–job fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.538978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Lepak, D. P. (2019). A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2498–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318818718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, R. D., Jr, Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18(2), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, P. C., & Chen, S. J. (2011). Crossing the level of employee's performance: HPWS, affective commitment, human capital, and employee job performance in professional service organisations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S., Gong, Y., & Shum, C. (2011). Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, C. H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 524–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of. Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1281–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, I., & Hyman, J. (1999). Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line. Personnel Review, 28(1–2), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489910248947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader‐member exchange and organisational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S., & Clifton, J. P. (2015). A Bayesian approach to multilevel structural equation modeling with continuous and dichotomous outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 292–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrnrooth, M., & Björkman, I. (2012). An integrative HRM process theorization: Beyond signaling effects and mutual gains. Journal of Management Studies, 49(6), 1109–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through ‘mindless’ work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17(4), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organisational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2019). Mediation effects in 2-1-1 multilevel model: Evaluation of alternative estimation methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(4),591–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinchbaugh, C., Li, P., Luth, M. T., & Chadwick, C. (2016). Team‐level high involvement work practices: Investigating the role of knowledge sharing and perspective taking. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Morris, T. (2020). Line managers as paradox navigators in hrm implementation: Balancing consistency and individual responsiveness. Journal of Management, 46(2), 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318785241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.001451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behaviour, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, B., Wright, P. M., Mahan, G. C. M., & Snell, S. A. (2000). Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 803–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Wu, J., Song, L. J., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Chang, S. (2013). Core knowledge employee creativity and firm performance: The moderating role of riskiness orientation, firm size, and realized absorptive capacity. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 443–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organisational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organisations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 75–170). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2009). Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: Antecedents and outcomes of I-deals from a managerial perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(8), 738–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910996770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organisations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organisational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., & Messersmith, J. (2018). On the shoulders of giants: A meta-review of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1384930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Where do we go from here? New perspectives on the Black Box in strategic human resource management research. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1448–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K. (2013). Bridging the gap between reality and perception: Managers’ role in shaping employee perceptions of high performance work systems [Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organisational behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2017). Reflections on the 2016-decade award: Incorporating context in organisational research. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organisational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
   Google Scholar
• Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S., & Patel, C. (2014). Content vs. process in the HRM‐ performance relationship: An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(5), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Management, 36, 366–391.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organisations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organisations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organisations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381).Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organisation, person– group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person–job and person–organisation fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D., Jiang, K., & Ployhart, R. E. (2017). HR strategy, structure and architecture. In C. Cooper & P. Sparrow (Eds.), A research agenda for human resource management. (pp. 23–38). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164–1188. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Long, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Lam, C. K. (2017). Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9508-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maertz, C. P., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: Integrating process and content turnover theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 566–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinaityte, I., Sacramento, C., & Aryee, S. (2019). Delighting the customer: Creativity-oriented high-performance work systems, frontline employee creative performance, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Management, 45(2), 728–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316672532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (1985). Personnel/human resource management. West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2017). Multilevel mediation with small samples: A cautionary note on the multilevel structural equation modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1280797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (1989). Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under range restriction: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the ‘why’ of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviours, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 503–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., & Wright, P. (2008). Variability within organisations: Implications for strategic human resource management. In D. B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place (pp. 229–252). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Team manager’s implementation, high performance work systems intensity, and performance: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2690–2715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316646829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke, M. R., Seo, M. G., & Sherf, E. N. (2015). Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peccei, R., & Van De Voorde, K. (2019). The application of the multilevel paradigm in human resource management–outcomes research: Taking stock and going forward. Journal of Management, 45(2), 786–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316673720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening, E. P., Baluch, A. M., & Salge, T. O. (2013). The relationship between employees’ perceptions of human resource systems and organisational performance: Examining mediating mechanisms and temporal dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 926–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organisational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 7, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Shipton, H., & Gomes, J. F. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Oldham, G. R. (1985). Effects of goal difficulty and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation: A laboratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 628–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Oldham, G. R., & Porac, J. F. (1987). Effects of goal difficulty, goal-setting method, and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 553–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R., & Vellella, R. F. (2009). Employee-organisation exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44635525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. (2016). Principles and applications of multilevel modeling in human resource management research. Human Resource Management, 55(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Jeong, I., & Bae, J. (2018). Do high-involvement HRM practices matter for worker creativity? A cross-level approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 2095–2112.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2004). The relation between career decision-making strategies and person–job fit: A study of job changers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organisational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1219–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.) Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behaviour, and organisational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, J. (2007). HRM and knowledge workers. In Boxall, P., Purcell, J. & Wright, P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 450–468). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, G., Yu, B., Cooke, F. L., & Chen, Y. (2017). High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organisational support and devolved management. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tims, M., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person– job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Voorde, K., & Beijer, S. (2015). The role of employee HR attributions in the relationship between high‐performance work systems and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organisational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M. (2005). Aligning strategic human resource management and person–environment fit. Human Resource Management Review, 15(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organisational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., Park, H. J., Gerhart, B., & Delery, J. E. (2001). Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: Additional data and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 875–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00235.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organisational behaviour: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In J. Paauwe, D. E. Guest, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), HRM & performance: Achievements & challenges. Wiley. 97-110
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K. Y. (2009). Affective influences in person-environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of p-e fit. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1210–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2018). Introducing team mindfulness and considering its safeguard role against conflict transformation and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
   Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41(2), 390–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313501200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar