‘To empower or not to empower, that’s the question’. Using an empowerment process approach to explain employees’ workplace proactivity

References

• Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. New York, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arefin, M. S., Arif, I., & Raquib, M. (2015). High-performance work systems and proactive behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n3p132
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-#
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audenaert, M., Vanderstraeten, A., & Buyens, D. (2017). When affective well-being is empowered: The joint role of leader-member exchange and the employment relationship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(15), 2208–2227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1137610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baane, R., Houtkamp, P., & Knotter, M. (2011). The new world of work unravelled. (In Dutch: Het nieuwe werken ontrafeld). Assen: Uitgeverij Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. [Database] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.7.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1999). Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations. Business Horizons, 42(3), 63–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(99)80023-8
   Google Scholar
• Batistič, S., Černe, M., Kaše, R., & Zupic, I. (2016). The role of organizational context in fostering employee proactive behavior: The interplay between HR system configurations and relational climates. European Management Journal, 34(5), 579–588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijl, D. (2009). Starting with new ways of working (In Dutch: Aan de slag met Het Nieuwe Werken). Zeewolde: Par CC.
   Google Scholar
• Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behaviour: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 567–598). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Binyamin, G., & Brender-Ilan, Y. (2018). Leaders’ language and employee proactivity: Enhancing psychological meaningfulness and vitality. European Management Journal, 36(4), 463–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañibano, A. (2019). Workplace flexibility as a paradoxical phenomenon: Exploring employee experiences. Human Relations, 72(2), 444–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718769716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A. (2003). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction?Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4),405–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028444.77080.c5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Smith, T. A., Kirkman, B. L., Zhang, P., Lemoine, G. J., & Farh, J. L. (2019). Multiple team membership and empowerment spill over effects: Can empowerment processes cross team boundaries?Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, X., & Li, W. (2017). The impact of high-commitment HR practices on hotel employees’ proactive customer service performance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965516649053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, C., & Spencer, C. (2007). A circular and dynamic model of the process of job design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X113211
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coun, M. J. H., Gelderman, C. J., & Pérez Arendsen, J. (2015). Shared leadership and proactivity in new ways of working (In Dutch: Gedeeld leiderschap en proactiviteit in Het Nieuwe Werken) (Vol. 28(8), pp. 356–379). Gedrag & Organisatie.
   Google Scholar
• Coun, M. J. H., Peters, P., & Blomme, R. J. (2019). Let’s share!’ The mediating role of employees’ self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2014). Sustainability and HRM: An introduction to the field. In I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. J. Zink (Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management: Developing sustainable business organizations (pp. 3–32). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnrooth, M., Barner‐Rasmussen, W., Koveshnikov, A., & Törnroos, M. (2020). A new look at the relationships between transformational leadership and employee attitudes—Does a high‐performance work system substitute and/or enhance these relationships?Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22024.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, K. H., & Snape, E. (2015). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment and employee outcomes: Testing a multi‐level mediating model. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Self-determination theory’s contribution to positive organizational psychology. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 61–82). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdenitsch, C., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2015). Control in flexible working arrangements. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J. (2010). On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational Statistics, 25(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0164-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snydermann, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, E., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11, 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged?Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, H., Aryee, S., Hsiung, H. H., & Guest, D. (2020). Fostering mutual gains: Explaining the influence of high‐performance work systems and leadership on psychological health and service performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 198–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., & Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee responses to empowering leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25, 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, B., Paskvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. In C. Korunka & B. Kubisec (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work: Impact on workers’ health and performance and implications for research and practice (pp. 45–63). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903321208871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Pak, J., Kim, S., & Li, L. Z. (2019). Effects of human resource management systems on employee proactivity and group innovation. Journal of Management, 45(2), 819–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316680029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, J., Segers, J., Van Dierendonck, D., & Den Hartog, D. (2018). Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & DeFrank, R. S. (2013). Self-interest and knowledge-sharing intentions: The impacts of transformational leadership climate and HR practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.709186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2012). Empowerment-fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1231–1281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312438773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 153–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Engle-wood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Variability within organizations: Implications for strategic human resources management. In D. B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations (pp. 225–248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., & Da Silva, N. (2015). The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modelling the antecedents of proactive behaviour at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Wu, C. H. (2014). Leading for proactivity: How leaders cultivate staff who make things happen. In D. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp 380–403). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Den Dulk, L., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of workplace flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work–life balance: The Dutch Case. Community, Work & Family, 12, 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Ligthart, P., Bardoel, A., & Poutsma, F. (2016). Fit’ for telework’? Cross-cultural variance and task-control explanations in organizations’ formal telework practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(21), 2582–2603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1232294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van der Heijden, B. I., Bakker, A. B., & Bruijn, T. D. (2014). Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM-process approach to study flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiñones, M., Van den Broeck, A., & De Witte, H. (2013). Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 29(3), 127–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a18
   Google Scholar
• Rank, J., Carsten, J. M., Unger, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Proactive customer service performance: Relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance, 20, 363–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710365092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt. Retrieved November 6, 2018 from http://www.smartpls.com.
   Google Scholar
• Root, L. S., & Young, A. A., Jr. (2011). Workplace flexibility and worker agency: Finding short-term flexibility within a highly structured workplace. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211415787
   Google Scholar
• Sardeshmukh, S. R., Sharma, D., & Golden, T. D. (2012). Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilpzand, P., Houston, L., & Cho, J. (2018). Not too tired to be proactive: Daily empowering leadership spurs next-morning employee proactivity as moderated by nightly sleep quality. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2367–2387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40, 193–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 54–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglbauer, B., & Kovacs, C. (2018). The more, the better? Curvilinear effects of job autonomy on well-being from vitamin model and PE-fit theory perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(4), 520–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways). Do new ways of working foster work engagement?Psicothema, 24(1), 113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Peters, P., & Kelliher, C. (2014). New ways of working and employability. Towards an agenda for HRD. In R. F. Poell, T. S. Rocco, & G. L. Roth (Eds.), The Routledge companion to human resource development (pp. 542–551). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wynarczyk, P. (2005). The impact of connectivity technologies on e‐flexible working practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises in the North East of England. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar