Examining collective creative self-efficacy as a competency indicator of group talent management: a study of SMEs in an emerging economy

References

• Acs Z. J., & Varga, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomerations, and technological change. Small Business Economics, 24 (3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1998-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2017). Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices. European Management Journal, 35(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models: The roles of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2011) (pp. 1–7). Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1994). Team climate inventory: Manual and user’s guide. ASE.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., Yuan, J., & Pan, J. (2017). Why SMEs in emerging economies are reluctant to provide employee training: Evidence from China. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616682360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee. (2020). Redefining SMEs will give the sector a boost. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/redefining-msmes-will-give-the-sector-a-boost/article30505802.ece
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1989). Toward a communication competency model of group leadership. Small Group Behavior, 20(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648902000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergius, R. (1976). Social psychology [Sozialpsychologie]. Hofmann and Campe.
   Google Scholar
• Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & Minhas, G. (2011). A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention. The Journal of PositivePsychology, 6, 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K.K. Klein & S. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bothner, M., Podolny, J. M., & Smith, E. (2011). Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect versus the Mark effect. Management Science, 57(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J. W. (2013). Appreciating and ‘retooling’ diversity in talent management conceptual models: A commentary on “The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 286–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Budhwar, P. S., & Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29(6), 640–663.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2014). Talent management: Conceptual approaches and practical challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091314
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheese, P., Thomas, R. J., & Craig, E. (2007). The talent powered organization: Strategies for globalization, talent management and high performance. Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chiva, R., & Alegre, J. (2009). Organizational learning capability and job satisfaction: An empirical assessment in the ceramic tile industry. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Salem, A., Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, C. I. C., Misati, E., Babalola, M. T., & Kim, K. (2020). Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: The roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710721
   Google Scholar
• Chuai, X., Preece, D., & Iles, P. (2008). Is talent management just ‘old wine in new bottles’? Management Research Review, 31(12), 901–911.
   Google Scholar
• CII (2019). Making Indian MSMEs globally competitive. https://cii.in/Publications
   Google Scholar
• Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Vaiman, V. (2011). European perspectives on talent management. European Journal of International Management, 5(5), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2011.042173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damperat, M., Jeannot, F., Jongmans, E., & Jolibert, A. (2016). Team creativity: Creative self-efficacy, creative collective efficacy and their determinants. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 31(3), 6–25.
   Google Scholar
• DeGraff, J., & Lawrence, K. A. (2002). Creativity at work: Developing the right practices to make innovation happen. (Vol. 28). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, T. J., & Vijayaraghavan, V. (2003). Let’s hear it for B players. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande, S. P., & Golhar, D. Y. (1994). HRM Practices in Large and Small Manufacturing Firms: A Comparative Study. Journal of Small Business Management, 32, 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Bartol, K. M., Zhang, Z. X., & Li, C. (2017). Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual-focused transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds). (2018). Global innovation index 2018: energizing the world with innovation. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-report
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Araoz, C., Roscoe, A., & Aramaki, K. (2017). Turning potential into success: The missing link in leadership development. Harvard Business Review, 95(6), 86–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festing, M., Schäfer, L., & Scullion, H. (2013). Talent management in medium-sized German companies: An explorative study and agenda for future research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1872–1893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.777538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Thunnissen, M., & Scullion, H. (2020). Talent management: Context matters. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1642645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, V., Bharadwaja, M., Yadav, S., & Kabra, G. (2019). TMX and innovative behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2018-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, V., & Tripathi, N. (2021). Perceived inclusion and team creativity climate: Examining the role of learning climate and task interdependency. Management Research Review, 44(6), 849–866. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisbert-Lopez, M. C., Verdu-Jover, A. J., & Gomez-Gras, J. M. (2014). The moderating effect of relationship conflict on the creative climate–innovation association: The case of traditional sectors in Spain. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(1), 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Priola, V., Sacramento, C. A., Woods, S. A., Higson, H. E., Budhwar, P. S., & West, M. A. (2014). Managing diversity in organizations: An integrative model and agenda for future research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(5), 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.805485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, X. H., & Huan, T. C. (2019). Talent management for the proactive behavior of tour guides. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(10), 4043–4061. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2018-0596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D., & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00062.x
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Han, G. H., & Bai, Y. (2020). Leaders can facilitate creativity: The moderating roles of leader dialectical thinking and LMX on employee creative self-efficacy and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2019-0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanke, R. C. M. (2006). Team creativity: A process model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, A. C., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., & Ye, J. H. (2019). Playing a Chinese remote-associated game: The correlation among flow, self-efficacy, collective self-esteem and competitive anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2720–2735. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 704–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128– 1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inamdar. (2016). The impact of culture on innovation in Indian companies. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-culture-innovation-indian-companies-rajiv-inamdar/
   Google Scholar
• Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. A., & Voorhees, R. A. (2002). Defining and assessing learning: exploring competency-based initiatives. Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on Competency-Based Initiatives in Postsecondary Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kak, N., Burkhalter, B., & Cooper, M. A. (2001). Measuring the competence of healthcare providers. Operations Research Issue Paper, 2(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffeld, S. (2006). Self-directed work groups and team competence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X53237
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Lee, H., & Connerton, T. P. (2020). How psychological safety affects team performance: Mediating role of efficacy and learning behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaki, M., & Elovainio, M. (1999). A short version of the Team Climate Inventory: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, T. N., & Scullion, H. (2017). Talent management and dynamic view of talent in small and medium enterprises. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanvin, B., & Monteiro, F. (Eds.). (2020). The global talent competitiveness index 2020: Global talent in the age of artificial intelligence. ISEAD. https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/globalindices/docs/GTCI-2020-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latukha, M., & Selivanovskikh, L. (2016). Talent management practices in IT companies from emerging markets: A comparative analysis of Russia, India, and China. Journal of East-West Business, 22(3), 168–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2016.1179702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makram, H., Sparrow, P., & Greasley, K. (2017). How do strategic actors think about the value of talent management? Moving from talent practice to the practice of talent. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(4), 259–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2017-0051
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A., Chin, W. W., & Saunders, C. (2009). A critical look at partial least squares modeling. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, A., & Collings, D. G. (2011). The identification and evaluation of talent in MNEs. In H. Scullion, & D. Collings (Eds.), Global talent management (pp. 72–89). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, A., Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Schuler, R. (2017). Talent management: A systematic review and future prospects. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), 86–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures: A computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., & Schermuly, C. C. (2012). When beliefs are not enough: Examining the interaction of diversity faultlines, task motivation, and diversity beliefs on team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(3), 456–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.560383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, S. E., & Watson, C. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.285
   Google Scholar
• MSCI. (2020). MSCI emerging markets index. Retrieved March 09, 2021, from https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/index/emerging-markets
   Google Scholar
• Neff, J., Holmes, S. M., Strong, S., Chin, G., De Avila, J., Dubal, S., … Lemay, E. (2019). The structural competency working group: Lessons from iterative, interdisciplinary development of a structural competency training module. In Structural competency in mental health and medicine (pp. 53–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, T., Stark, T. H., & Verkuyten, M. (2019). Negative intergroup contact and radical right-wing voting: The moderating roles of personal and collective self-efficacy. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, M. B., Annansingh, F., Eaglestone, B., & Wakefield, R. (2006). Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610642075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltra, V., & Vivas-López, S. (2013). Boosting organizational learning through team-based talent management: What is the evidence from large Spanish firms? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1853–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.777540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N. K., Jang, W., Thomas, E. L., & Smith, J. (2021). How to organize creative and innovative teams: Creative self-efficacy and innovative team performance. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1842010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertuz, V. P., Geizzelez, M. L., Pérez, A., & Vega, A. L. (2020). The relationship between organisational learning and innovation capabilities in medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 22(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2020.107843
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. (2012). Should leadership talent management in schools also include the management of self-belief? School Leadership & Management, 32(5), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2012.724671
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., & House, R. J. (1994). Meso organizational behavior: Avoiding three fundamental biases. Journal of Organizational Behavior (1986-1998), 1, 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, M. R., Lant, T. K., Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Research, 43(5), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412453622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. L. (2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Kim, T. Y., Lee, J. Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, J. B. (1984). A model of effective leadership styles in India. International Studies of Management & Organization, 14(2-3), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1984.11656388
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, J. B. (2014). Psycho-social analysis of the Indian mindset. Springer India.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, J. B. P. (1970). Development through behaviour modification (Vol. 5). Allied Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, P. (2019). A historical analysis of critiques in the talent management debate. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, P., Liu, Y., Smith, S., Leidner, S., Moore, N., & Rowland, C. (2016). Managing talent across advanced and emerging economies: HR issues and challenges in a Sino-German strategic collaboration. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20), 2310–2338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1074090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straube, J., Meinecke, A. L., Schneider, K., & Kauffeld, S. (2018). Effects of media compensation on team performance: The role of demographic faultlines. Small Group Research, 49(6), 684–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418796281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth, K., Harvey, S., & Peterson, R. (2016). A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 453–493. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197851111145853
   Google Scholar
• Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2010). Global talent management: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teagarden, M. B., Von Glinow, M. A., & Mellahi, K. (2018). Contextualizing inter- national business research: Enhancing rigor and relevance. Journal of World Business, 53(3), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., & Thuriaux-Alemán, B. (2016). Innovation management practices: Cross-sectorial adoption, variation, and effectiveness. R&D Management, 46(S3), 1024–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12199
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Times of India. (2015). Teamwork a handicap for most Indian executives. Retrieved September 11, 2018 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Teamwork-a-handicap-for-most-Indian-executives-Study/articleshow/48062827.cms
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, N., & Ghosh, V. (2020). Deep-level diversity and workgroup creativity: The role of creativity climate. Indian Journal of Business Research, 12(4), 605–624
   Google Scholar
• Vaiman, V., Collings, D. G., & Scullion, H. (2017). Contextualising talent management. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(4), 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-12-2017-070
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M., Scullion, H., & Ryan, G. (2013). Talent management in Spanish medium- sized organisations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1832–1852. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.777545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., Kooij-de Bode, H. J., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organization Science, 21(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterwall, B., Fuller, B., & Budden, H. (2017). Understanding the inner muse: Integrating the creative self-efficacy literature 1. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29(2), 189–120.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020. Retrieved March 09, 2021, from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24 (3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 305–328). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zenger, T. R., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2004). Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort? Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(67), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1194
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Hitt, M. A., & Tihanyi, L. (2006). The internationalization of SMES in emerging economies: Institutional embeddedness and absorptive capacities. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 1–26.
   Google Scholar