Is it your engagement or mine? Linking supervisors’ work engagement and employee performance

References

• Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angle, H., & Perry, J. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dorris, A. D. (2017). Emotions in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113231
   Google Scholar
• Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1542–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223981003648336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Brummelhuis, L. L. (2012). Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Burnout contagion among intensive care nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03494.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., van Emmerik, H., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work and Occupations, 33(4), 464–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888406291310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basit, A. A. (2017). Trust in supervisor and job engagement: Mediating effects of psychological safety and felt obligation. The Journal of Psychology, 151(8), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1372350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistelli, A., Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., & Pohl, S. (2013). Beyond the tradition: Test of an integrative conceptual model on nurse turnover. International Nursing Review, 60(1), 103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: The role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan, 47, 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, N., & Mazumder, Z. (2017). Exploring organizational citizenship behavior as an outcome of job satisfaction: A critical review. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personality selection. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesário, F., & Chambel, M. J. (2017). Linking organizational commitment and work engagement to employee performance. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Wang, H. (2017). Abusive supervision and employees’ job performance: A multiple mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(5), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.5657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 241–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, V., Salanova, M., & Martínez, I. M. (2013). Liderazgo transformacional y desempeño grupal: Unidos por el engagement grupal. Revista de Psicología Social, 28(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347413806196762
   Google Scholar
• Dávila, M. C., Finkelstein, M. A., & Castien, J. I. (2011). Diferencias de género en conducta prosocial: El comportamiento de ciudadanía organizacional. Anales de Psicología, 27, 498–506.
   Google Scholar
• Decoster, S., Camps, J., Stouten, J., Vandevyvere, L., & Tripp, T. M. (2013). Standing by your organization: The impact of organizational identification and abusive supervision on followers’ perceived cohesion and tendency to gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1612-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 34(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee work engagement and job performance. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 147–163). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas, O., Hannah, S. T., Gok, K., Arslan, A., & Capar, N. (2017). The moderated influence of ethical leadership, via meaningful work, on followers’ engagement, organizational identification, and envy. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2907-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldor, L. (2020). How collective engagement creates competitive advantage for organizations: A business‐level model of shared vision, competitive intensity, and service performance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 177–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, B., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Failure feedback as an affective event: Influences of leader affect on subordinate attitudes and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 663–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutermann, D., Lehman-Willenbrock, N., Boer, D., Born, M., & Voelpel, S. C. (2017). ‘How Leaders Affect Followers’ work engagement and performance: Integrating leader − member exchange and crossover theory. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2018). Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 289–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker, and M. P Leiter, (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (Vol. 8, pp.102–117). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, M. B., Reaves, A. C., & Viswesvaran, C. (2016). Creative and innovative performance: A meta-analysis of relationships with task, citizenship, and counterproductive job performance dimensions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1134491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., & Kacmar, K. M. (2011). Abusive supervisory reactions to co-worker relationship conflict. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, Z., Saleem, Z., & Rajput, A. A. (2014). The mediating role of employee engagement between the relationship of distributive justice and organizational citizenship behavior: Empirical evidence from Aviation Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Management Science, 14(2), 494–500.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D., & Gavin, M. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling , 6(1), 1–55. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Luthans, F. (2015). Toward a better understanding of the learning goal orientation creativity relationship: The role of positive psychological capital. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 444–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. C., & You, C. S. (2011). The three components of organizational commitment on in-role behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 11335–11344.
   Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Liu, X.-Y., Liu, Y., & Zheng, X. (2017). Why do employees have better family lives when they are highly engaged at work? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. K. (2009). Do you feel what I feel? Mood contagion and leadership outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, W., Kim, J., Woo, H., Park, J., Jo, J., Park, S. H., & Lim, S. Y. (2017). The relationship between work engagement and organizational commitment: Proposing research agendas through a review of empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317725967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1032–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., & Yu, K. (2019). Career adaptability and citizenship outcomes: A moderated mediation model. Career Development International, 24(7), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2018-0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(3), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.13.3.378
   Google Scholar
• Mercury, Z. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14, 389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, C., Schaufeli, W., Struyve, C., Vandecandelaere, M., Gielen, S., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Burnout contagion among teachers: A social network approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(2), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Maltin, E. R. (2010). Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. H. (2001). Beyond the age of Dilbert: Accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir, O., & Islam, J. (2017). Enhancing organizational commitment and employee performance through employee engagement: An empirical check. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-04-2016-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, R. C. (1999). Increasing affective organizational commitment in public organizations: The key role of interpersonal trust. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9901900305
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgambídez, A., & Almeida, H. (2020). Supervisor support and affective organizational commitment: The mediator role of work engagement. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(3), 187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgambídez, A., & Benítez, M. (2021). Understanding the link between work engagement and affective organisational commitment: The moderating effect of role stress. International Journal of Psychology, 56(5), 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2007). Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of affective, normative, and continuance commitment: Empirical tests of commitment effects in federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 197–226.
   Google Scholar
• Petitta, L., & Jiang, L. (2020). How emotional contagion relates to burnout: A moderated mediation model of job insecurity and group member prototypicality. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee performance at workplace: Conceptual model and empirical validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533716671630
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. P., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmadani, V. G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). Engaging leadership and work engagement as moderated by “diuwongke”: An Indonesian study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1799234
   Google Scholar
• Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., Stouten, J., Zhang, Z., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2020). Engaging leadership and its implication for work engagement and job outcomes at the individual and team level: A multilevel longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reijseger, G., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). From motivation to activation: Why engaged workers are better performers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9435-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina-Tamayo, A. M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2018). The work engagement–performance link: An episodic perspective. Career Development International, 23 (5), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M. (1981). Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 12, 1013–1035.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover–crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9421-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational culture: Effects on work engagement and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
   Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J., & Martínez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra‐role performance: The mediating role of self‐efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2256–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cardona, I., Rodríguez-Montalban, R., Toro-Alfonso, J., & Moreno Velázquez, I. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student (UWES-S) in University students in Puerto Rico. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 33, 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cardona, I., Salanova, M., & Llorens, S. (2018). How does team positive affect mediate leadership intellectual stimulation and team learning? Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-1.list
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essentials theory and research (pp.10–24). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., Organ, D., & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Physiological Assessment, 35, 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrima, F., Lorito, L., Parry, E., & Falgares, G. (2014). The mediating role of work engagement on the relationship between job involvement and affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(15), 2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.862289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders’ well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinger, O. N., van Olffen, W., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Individual well-being and performance at work: A conceptual and theoretical overview. In M. Van Veldhoven, & R. Peccei (Eds.), Well-being and performance at work: The role of context (pp. 15–34). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema, 24(1), 106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kleef, G. A., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, H., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Crossover of Engagement in groups. Career Development International, 23(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Woerkom, M., Bakker, A. B., & Nishii, L. H. (2016). Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00029-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volmer, J. (2012). Catching leaders’ mood: Contagion effects in teams. Administrative Sciences, 2(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci2030203
   Google Scholar
• Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1999). The crossover of strain from school principals to teachers and vice versa. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4 (3), 269–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative review. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285349
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. J., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Innovative work behaviors, employee engagement, and surface acting: A delineation of supervisor-employee emotional contagion effects. Management Decision, 57(11), 3200–3216. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2018-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B., Zhou, W., Xia, D., & Guo, Y. (2019). What drives the trickle-down effect of calling orientation from supervisors to subordinates? The perspective of social learning theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Liu, Y., & Chung, B. (2017). Leader psychological capital and employee work engagement. The roles of employee psychological capital and team collectivism. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2016-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayas-Ortiz, M., Rosario, E., Marquez, E., & Colón, P. (2015). Relationship between organizational commitments and organizational citizenship behaviour in a sample of private banking employees. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(1/2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-02-2014-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2013). Individual behavior: In-role and extra-role. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v4n1p23
   Google Scholar