Middle-managers’ innovative behavior: the roles of psychological empowerment and personal initiative

References

• Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., Saeed, B. B., & Hafeez, S. (2017). Transformational and transactional leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledge–intensive industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Shaw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10., pp. 123–167). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnewies, C., & Gromer, M. (2012). Creativity and innovation at work: The role of work characteristics and personal initiative. Psicothema, 24(1), 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701514728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human Resource Management Review, 22(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, C. (2013). Factors influencing middle managers’ ability to contribute to corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z., Parker, S. K., Chen, Z., & Lam, W. (2019). How does the social context fuel the proactive fire? A multilevel review and theoretical synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, F., Frese, M., Goldstein, M., Iacovone, L., Johnson, H. C., McKenzie, D., & Mensmann, M. (2017). Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa. Science (New York, N.Y.), 357(6357), 1287–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniëls, M. C., & Veld, M. (2019). Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Özbağ, G. K. (2016). Psychological empowerment and support for innovation in Turkish manufacturing industry: Relations with individual creativity and firm innovativeness. Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2016-1-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. Y., & Chang, Y. C. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation, social networks, and creative performance: Middle managers as corporate entrepreneurs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(3), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Jiang, Y. J., Tang, G., & Cooke, F. L. (2018). High‐commitment work systems and middle managers’ innovative behavior in the Chinese context: The moderating role of work‐life conflicts and work climate. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1317–1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 333–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coun, M., Peters, P., Blomme, R. J., & Schaveling, J. (2021). To empower or not to empower, that’s the question’. Using an empowerment process approach to explain employees’ workplace proactivity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., Burgess, N., & Hayton, J. C. (2015). HR practices and knowledge brokering by hybrid middle managers in hospital settings: The influence of professional hierarchy. Human Resource Management, 54(5), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., Castañer, X., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2011). Entrepreneurial initiative selling within organizations: Towards a more comprehensive motivational framework. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1269–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00999.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2018). Innovative work behaviour and performance-related pay: Rewarding the individual or the collective? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(12), 1900–1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’ Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<407::AID-SMJ881>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, B., Jr,., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., Birkinshaw, J., McDaniel Sumpter, D., & Ambos, T. (2019). The hierarchical erosion effect: A new perspective on perceptual differences and business performance. Journal of Management Studies, 56(8), 1713–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, L., Fourne, S. P., & Elfring, T. (2015). Achieving strategic renewal: The multi-level influences of top and middle managers’ boundary-spanning. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9633-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, D. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Huy, Q. N., & Xiao, Z. (2017). How middle managers manage the political environment to achieve market goals: Insights from China’s state‐owned enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 676–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmy, I., Adawiyah, W. R., & Banani, A. (2019). Linking psychological empowerment, knowledge sharing, and employees’ innovative behavior in SMEs. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 14(2), 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Liao, H., Raub, S., & Han, J. H. (2016). What it takes to get proactive: An integrative multilevel model of the antecedents of personal initiative. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 687–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. P. C., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 1–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(04), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.50
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., & Liu, C. W. (2015). High performance work systems and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of social capital. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, A. (2018). Creativity and innovation through LMX and personal initiative. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knol, J., & Van Linge, R. (2009). Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kör, B., Wakkee, I., & van der Sijde, P. (2021). How to promote managers’ innovative behavior at work: Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation, 99, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuokkanen, L., & Leino‐Kilpi, H. (2000). Power and empowerment in nursing: Three theoretical approaches. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.646894
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Palonen, T. (2018). Vocational education teachers’ personal network at school as a resource for innovative work behaviour. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2017-0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani, F., Battistelli, A., & Odoardi, C. (2017). Proactive goal generation and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of affective commitment, production ownership and leader support for innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, M. J., Badri, S. K. Z., & Ramos, H. M. (2022). Linking middle-managers’ ownership feelings to their innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of affective organisational commitment. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, M., Martin, L., & Hughes, M. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815627360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Wu, C. H. (2014). Leading for proactivity: How leaders cultivate staff who make things happen. In D. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 380–403). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P., Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Klinger, R. L. (2013). Are we really measuring what we say we’re measuring? Using video techniques to supplement traditional construct validation procedures. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 99–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90004-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., Menezes, I., & Ferreira, P. D. (2018). Validating the formative nature of psychological empowerment construct: Testing cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and relational empowerment components. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeck, H., & Diehl, M. R. (2017). A literature review on HRM and innovation–taking stock and future directions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(6), 913–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1143862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M., & Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speier, C., & Frese, M. (1997). Generalized self efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2017). Fostering employees’ proactive strategic engagement: Individual and contextual antecedents. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnipseed, D. L., & VandeWaa, E. A. (2020). The little engine that could: The impact of psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 23(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-06-2019-0077
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, K. L., & Parker, S. K. (2003). Proactivity and innovation: Promoting a new workforce for the new workplace. The New Workplace: A Guide to the Human Impact of Modern Working Practices, 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Veenendaal, A., & Bondarouk, T. (2015). Perceptions of HRM and their effect on dimensions of innovative work behaviour: Evidence from a manufacturing firm. Management Revu, 26(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2015-2-138
   Google Scholar
• Weigt-Rohrbeck, J., & Linneberg, M. S. (2019). Democratizing innovation processes: Personal initiative in bottom-up eco-innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(5), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikhamn, W., & Selart, M. (2019). Empowerment and initiative: The mediating role of obligation. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(4), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-11-2017-0273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1190–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Ma, Z., & Wang, M. S. (2018). Developing new capability: Middle managers’ role in corporate entrepreneurship. European Business Review, 30(4), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-08-2016-0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar