New ways of working and the implications for employees: a systematic framework and suggestions for future research

References

• Abdelilah, B., El Korchi, A., & Balambo, M. A. (2018). Flexibility and agility: Evolution and relationship. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(7), 1138–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, M., Beauregard, T. A., & Lewis, S. (2023). Managing through covid: Experiences of managers who are parents. Working families report.
   Google Scholar
• Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Truss, C. (2012). The link between perceived HRM practices, performance and well-being: The moderating effect of trust in the employer. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. J., Kaplan, S. A., & Vega, R. P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.966086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annosi, M. C., Foss, N., & Martini, A. (2020). When agile harms learning and innovation: (and what can be done about it). California Management Review, 63(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620948265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance systems pay off. ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avgoustaki, A., & Bessa, I. (2019). Examining the link between flexible working arrangement bundles and employee work effort. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. E. (2022). Emerging technologies at work: Policy ideas to address negative consequences for work, workers, and society. ILR Review, 75(3), 527–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221076747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballario, M. (2020). Telework in the EU before and after the covid-19: Where we were, where we head to. European Institute for Gender Equality. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1950578/telework-in-the-eu-before-and-after-the-covid-19/2702347/
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathini, D. R., & Kandathil, G. M. (2019). An orchestrated negotiated exchange: Trading home-based telework for intensified work. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3449-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, M. I., & Leonardi, P. M. (2022). Pace layering as a metaphor for organizing in the age of intelligent technologies: Considering the future of work by theorizing the future of organizing. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12867
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, T. A., Canonico, E., & Basile, K. A. (2019). “The fur-lined rut”: Telework and career ambition. In Clare Kelliher & Julia Richardson (Eds.), Work, working and work relationships in a changing world (1 ed., pp. 17–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhave, D. P., Teo, L. H., & Dalal, R. S. (2020). Privacy at work: A review and a research agenda for a contested terrain. Journal of Management, 46(1), 127–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319878254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Lepak, D. P. (2019). A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2498–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318818718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J. W. (2020). The psychologisation of employment relations, alternative models of the employment relationship, and the OB turn. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. D. (2022). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. D., & Rahman, H. (2022). Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. D., Thomason, B., & Conzon, V. M. (2021). Risky business: Gig workers and the navigation of ideal worker expectations during the covid-19 pandemic. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1821–1833. https://doi.org/10.1037/APL0000993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañibano, A. (2019). Workplace flexibility as a paradoxical phenomenon: Exploring employee experiences. Human Relations, 72(2), 444–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718769716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañibano, A., & Avgoustaki, A. (2022). To telework or not to telework: Does the macro context matter? A signalling theory analysis of employee interpretations of telework in times of turbulence. Human Resource Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12457
   Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2013). Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2018). HR goes agile. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonaro, G. (2022). No end in sight for the ‘great resignation’ as inflation pushes workers to seek better-paid jobs. Euronews.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2019). Megatrends report: Flexible working. https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/megatrends-report-flexible-working-1_tcm18-52769.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Personnel Development. (2022). The great resignation- fact or fiction? https://www.cipd.co.uk/news-views/cipd-voice/Issue-33/great-resignation-fact-fiction#gref.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. K., Chevalier, J. A., Rossi, P. E., & Oehlsen, E. (2019). The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. Journal of Political Economy, 127(6), 2735–2794. https://doi.org/10.1086/702171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Fulmer, I. S. (2018). Fine-tuning what we know about employees’ experience with flexible work arrangements and their job attitudes. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., Dubal, V. B., Carter, C., & Org, E. (2017). Labor platforms and gig work: The failure to regulate. (pp. 106–117.
   Google Scholar
• D’Addona, D. M., Bracco, F., Bettoni, A., Nishino, N., Carpanzano, E., & Bruzzone, A. A. (2018). Adaptive automation and human factors in manufacturing: An experimental assessment for a cognitive approach. CIRP Annals, 67(1), 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2011). Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2017). Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, M., Frazis, H., Loewenstein, M. A., & Sun, H. (2020). Ability to work from home: Evidence from two surveys and implications for the labor market in the covid-19 pandemic. Monthly Labor Review, June 2020, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2020.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and hrm. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2021). Boundaryless careers and algorithmic constraints in the gig economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1953565
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & Gulati, R. (2021). Agility hacks how to create temporary teams that can bypass bureaucracy and get crucial work done quickly. Harvard Business Review, 99(6), 46–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., Cable, D. M., & Sherman, J. W. (2010). How passive ‘face time’ affects perceptions of employees: Evidence of spontaneous trait inference. Human Relations, 63(6), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709353139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Employed persons working from home as a percentage of the total employment, by sex, age and professional status (%).
   Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2012). Testing the connectivity paradox: Linking teleworkers’ communication media use to social presence, stress from interruptions, and organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 79(2), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.673000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, J., & Kerr, W. (2022). The great resignation didn’t start with the pandemic. https://hbr.org/2022/03/the-great-resignation-didnt-start-with-the-pandemic.
   Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerards, R., De Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement? Personnel Review, 47(2), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerards, R., van Wetten, S., & van Sambeek, C. (2021). New ways of working and intrapreneurial behaviour: The mediating role of transformational leadership and social interaction. Review of Managerial Science, 15(7), 2075–2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00412-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleim, M. R., Johnson, C. M., & Lawson, S. J. (2019). Sharers and sellers: A multi-group examination of gig economy workers’ perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 98, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godard, J. (2014). The psychologisation of employment relations? Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, M., & Mustafa, M. (2013). ‘Work always wins’: Client colonisation, time management and the anxieties of connected freelancers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60(11), 1641–1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707084303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D. (2012). Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: Telework during traditional and nontraditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-011-9247-0/FIGURES/4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Eddleston, K. A. (2020). Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Fromen, A. (2011). Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional, telework, virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes. Human Relations, 64(11), 1451–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711418387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grass, A., Backmann, J., & Hoegl, M. (2020). From empowerment dynamics to team adaptability: Exploring and conceptualizing the continuous agile team innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. V., & Krueger, A. B. (2018). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. ILR Review, 71(3), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917717222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, J. (2022). Is quiet quitting real? https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Martino Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017). Agile methods on large projects in large organizations. Project Management Journal, 48(3), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., Syrdal, D. S., & Holts, K. (2018). Work in the European gig economy: Research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/19922/Huws_U._Spencer_N.H._Syrdal_D.S._Holt_K._2017_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., & Obodaru, O. (2016). Betwixt and between identities: Liminal experience in contemporary careers. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, T. L., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & Molenaar, D. (2022). Agile work practices: Measurement and mechanisms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2096439
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). The role of unemployment in the rise in alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(5), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918820008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–240). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Richardson, J. (2012). Recent development in new ways of organizing work. In C. Kelliher & J. Richardson (Eds.), New ways of organizing work: Developments, perspectives and experiences (pp. 1–15) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khanagha, S., Volberda, H. W., Alexiou, A., & Annosi, M. C. (2022). Mitigating the dark side of agile teams: Peer pressure, leaders’ control, and the innovative output of agile teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2018). Work–life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work–life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, S., & Brunori, C. (2021). What to do when the robots come? Non-formal education in jobs affected by automation. International Journal of Manpower, 42(8), 1397–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2020-0314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. (2016). Robotic process automation at telefónica O2. MIS Quaterly Executive, 15(1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2021). “Seeing to be seen”: The manager’s political economy of visibility in new ways of working. European Management Journal, 39(5), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Isaac, H., & Kalika, M. (2014). Mobile information systems and organisational control: Beyond the panopticon metaphor? European Journal of Information Systems, 23(5), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data. MIS Quarterly , 34(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., & Takayama, L. (2011). “Now, I have a body": Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2011, Vancouver, California.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, A., Pluviano, S., & Briscoe, J. P. (2018). Are freelancers a breed apart? The role of protean and boundaryless career attitudes in employability and career success. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffie, M. D. (2022). The perils of laundering control through customers: A study of control and resistance in the ride-hail industry. ILR Review, 75(2), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920972679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, M., Sarwar, S., & Orr, S. (2021). Agile practices and performance: Examining the role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. (2018). How human-computer ‘superminds’ are redefining the future of work. MIT Sloan Management Review (Summer Issue), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017). A future that works: AI, Automation, employment, and productivity (Tech. Rep. 60). McKinsey Global Institute Research.
   Google Scholar
• Marinova, D., de Ruyter, K., Huang, M. H., Meuter, M. L., & Challagalla, G. (2017). Getting smart: Learning from technology-empowered frontline interactions. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, D. (2004). The ‘network economy’ and models of the employment contract. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(4), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastercard. (2020). Fueling the global gig economy. https://www.mastercard.us/content/dam/public/mastercardcom/na/us/en/documents/mastercard-fueling-the-global-gig-economy-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McIver, D., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2018). A strategic approach to workforce analytics: Integrating science and agility. Business Horizons, 61(3), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey. (2021). The future of work after covid-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19.
   Google Scholar
• Min, J., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Jang, T. W., Kim, I., & Song, J. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution and its impact on cccupational health and safety, worker’s compensation and labor conditions. Safety and Health at Work, 10(4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHAW.2019.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaï, K., Islam, G., Manning, S., & Terlinden, L. (2022). “All too human” or the emergence of a techno-induced feeling of being less-able: Identity work, ableism and new service technologies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2066982
   Google Scholar
• Munck, B. (2001). Changing a culture of face time. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratbekova-Touron, M., & Leon, E. (2021). “Is there anybody out there?” using a telepresence robot to engage in face time at the office. Information Technology & People. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0080
   Google Scholar
• Murgia, A., & Pulignano, V. (2021). Neither precarious nor entrepreneur: The subjective experience of hybrid self-employed workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(4), 1351–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19873966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, L. R. G., Chakrabarti, M., McClure, T. K., & Baltes, B. B. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of telecommuting on employee outcomes. In 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, California.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M., Wilson, J., & Metiu, A. (2014). Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1243. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2020). Coronavirus and homeworking in the UK. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/coronavirusandhomeworkingintheuk/april2020.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2022). Coronavirus (covid-19) latest insights. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/lifestyle#home-and-hybrid-working.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, T., Van De Voorde, K., & Paauwe, J. (2022). The effects of working agile on team performance and engagement. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 28(1/2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-07-2021-0049
   Google Scholar
• Pesole, A., Urzi, B. M. C., Fernandez, M. E., Biagi, F., & Gonsalez, V. I. (2018). Platform workers in Europe: Evidence from the colleem survey. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Bakker, A. B., & Bruijn, T. D. (2014). Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM-process approach to study flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. (2022). Covid-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/02/16/covid-19-pandemic-continues-to-reshape-work-in-america/.
   Google Scholar
• Pichault, F., & McKeown, T. (2019). Autonomy at work in the gig economy: Analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713495704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racabi, G. (2021). Effects of city–state relations on labor relations: The case of Uber. ILR Review, 74(5), 1155–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211036445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2004). Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management, 43(2–3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, I., Prouska, R., & Chatrakul Na Ayudhya, U. (2022). The rhetorics of ‘agile’ and the practices of ‘agile working’: Consequences for the worker experience and uncertain implications for HR practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2099751
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942.
   Google Scholar
• Salmen, K., & Festing, M. (2021). Paving the way for progress in employee agility research: A systematic literature review and framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1943491
   Google Scholar
• Shifrin, N. V., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 36(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1936287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2022). 50% of companies want workers back in office 5 days a week. CNBC.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Gao, J. (2020). Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(7), 2649–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00196-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundararajan, A. (2017). The future of work. Finance Development, June, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tempest, S., & Starkey, K. (2004). The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning. Organization Studies, 25(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Hoeven, C. L., van Zoonen, W., & Fonner, K. L. (2016). The practical paradox of technology: The influence of communication technology use on employee burnout and engagement. Communication Monographs, 83(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1133920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietze, S., & Nadin, S. (2011). The psychological contract and the transition from office-based to home-based work. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, J., Rienemschneider, C., & Thatcher, J. (2016). Job satisfaction in agile development teams: Agile development as work redesign. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(4), 267–307. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troth, A. C., & Guest, D. E. (2020). The case for psychology in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Groenendaal, S. M. E., Freese, C., Poell, R. F., & Kooij, D. T. A. M. (2022). Inclusive human resource management in freelancers’ employment relationships: The role of organizational needs and freelancers’ psychological contracts. Human Resource Management Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12432
   Google Scholar
• Van Steenbergen, E. F., van der Ven, C., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2018). Transitioning towards new ways of working: Do job demands, job resources, burnout, and engagement change? Psychological Reports, 121(4), 736–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117740134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Schlagwein, D., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Cahalane, M. C. (2020). Beyond the factory paradigm: Digital nomadism and the digital future(s) of knowledge work post-covid-19. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, D. (2012). Good to be home? Time-use and satisfaction levels among home-based teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. (1989). The transformation of work? Skill, flexibility, and the labour process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar