Different systems, similar experiences: felt accountability in labor platforms and traditional organizations

References

• Alanezi, F., & Alanzi, T. (2020). A gig mHealth economy framework: Scoping review of internet publications. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(1), e14213. https://doi.org/10.2196/14213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliemuddin, W. (2022). Gig platforms and technology-driven management–An overview of algorithms driving platform labor. ScienceOpen Preprints. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PP4VWLU.v1
   Google Scholar
• Aloisi, A. (2015). Commoditized workers: Case study research on labor law issues arising from a set of on-demand/gig economy platforms. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 653–690.
   Google Scholar
• Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, M. L., & Arnaud, A. (2013). Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct?. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 59–84). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, S., Castillo, J. C., & Chandar, B. (2019). Service Quality on Online Platforms: Empirical Evidence about Driving Quality at Uber (April 4, 2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499781
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Ishizaka, A., Gupta, M., & Shankar, A. (2022). Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1378–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellesia, F., Mattarelli, E., & Bertolotti, F. (2023). Algorithms and their affordances: How crowdworkers manage algorithmic scores in online labour markets. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann, L., & Hübler, O. (2020). Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance–robust or heterogeneous links? International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. (2015). Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37, 543–576.
   Google Scholar
• Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., & Vaslow, J. B. (2000). Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botelho, T. L., & DeCelles, K. A. (2022). Platforms and prejudice: The cycle of racial disparities on a labor platform. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 12231. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.12231abstract
   Google Scholar
• Brtek, M. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardador, M. T., Northcraft, G. B., & Whicker, J. (2017). A theory of work gamification: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something cool? Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2015). Peeking beneath the hood of Uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 495–508). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815681
   Google Scholar
• Christin, A. (2017). Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 205395171771885. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, B. G., & Schneider, B. (2002). Serving multiple masters: Role conflict experienced by service employees. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419424
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., Dubal, V., & Carter, C. (2017). Labor platforms and gig work: The failure to regulate. Institute for Research on Labour and Employment: Working Paper 106–17 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039742
   Google Scholar
• Corporaal, G. F., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Platform sourcing: How Fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms. University of Oxford. https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/platform-sourcing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, T., & Moore, J. (2004). Work–life balance and working from home. Social Policy and Society, 3(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746404001733
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. L., & Anton, R. J. (1990). The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. In S. Srivastva & D. L. Cooperrider, Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organizations (pp. 257–286). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L., Agahi, N., & Lennartsson, C. (2018). Lonelier than ever? Loneliness of older people over two decades. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 75, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivated processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., Beersma, B., Stroebe, K., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 927–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groen, W., Maselli, I., & Fabo, B. (2016). The digital market for local services: A one-night stand for workers? An example from the on-demand economy (CEPS Special Report, 133). https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/digital-market-local-services-one-night-stand-workers-example-demand-economy/
   Google Scholar
• De Langhe, B., van Osselaer, S. M., & Wierenga, B. (2011). The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X., Joshi, K. D., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, S. A., Goodson, B. M., & Pearson, C. A. (2020). Online worker fraud and evolving threats to the integrity of MTurk data: A discussion of virtual private servers and the limitations of IP-based screening procedures. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-18-044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, S., & Sterling, T. (2021). Uber drivers are employees, not contractors, says Dutch Court. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-employees-not-contractors-newspaper-2021-09-13/
   Google Scholar
• Dewi, R. C., & Riantoputra, C. D. (2019). Felt accountability: The role of personality and organizational factors. Journal of Management Development, 38(4), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2018-0375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., Carbery, R., McDonnell, A., & Sherman, U. (2023). Algorithmic HRM control in the gig economy: The app-worker perspective. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, B., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Greig, F., & Hamoudi, A. (2018). The online platform economy in 2018: Drivers, workers, sellers, and lessors. JP Morgan Chase Institute. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3252994
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Mitchell, T. R., Canavan, P. J., Frink, D. D., & Hopper, H. (1995). Accountability in human resource systems. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, & D. T. Barnum (Eds.), Handbook of human resource management (pp. 175–196). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. A. (2016). Congruence of work style preferences and work contexts and accountability on individual effort [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Nebraska at Omaha.
   Google Scholar
• Filippas, A., Horton, J. J., & Golden, J. (2022). Reputation inflation. Marketing Science, 41(4), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkin, M. W. (2015). Beclouded work, beclouded workers in historical perspective. Comparative. Labor. Law. & Policy Journal, 37, 603–618.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2019). The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619839428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frink, D. D., Hall, A. T., Perryman, A. A., Ranft, A. L., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Todd Royle, M. (2008). Meso-level theory of accountability in organizations. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 177–245). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-7301(08)27005-2
   Google Scholar
• Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, (pp. 1–51). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Geber, B. A., Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1983). The accountability of conduct: A social psychological analysis. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gebrial, D. (2022). Racial platform capitalism: Empire, migration and the making of Uber in London, 1-25. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X221115439.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbins, P. (2018). Extending employee protections to gig-economy workers through the entrepreneurial opportunity test of FedEx home delivery. Wash. University Journal of Law & Policy, 57, 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2021). Über-alienated: Powerless and alone in the gig economy. Work and Occupations, 48(4), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211024711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop silicon valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919864564
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2021, December 2). Amazon’s employee surveillance fuels unionization efforts: ‘It’s not prison, it’s work’. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/12/02/amazon-workplace-monitoring-unions/
   Google Scholar
• Griswold, A. (2017, July 25). Uber is finally making riders explain themselves when they rate a driver below five stars. QZ.com. https://qz.com/1038285/uber-will-make-riders-explain-when-they-rate-a-driver-below-five-stars/
   Google Scholar
• Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020). Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2), 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., Bowen, M. G., Ferris, G. R., Royle, M. T., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (2007). The accountability lens: A new way to view management issues. Business Horizons, 50(5), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). Accountability and extra-role behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9148-9
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., & Bowen, M. G. (2003). Accountability in human resources management. In C. A. Schriesheim, & L. Neider (Eds.), New Directions in Human Resource Management, 29–63. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., Wikhamn, W., & Cardy, R. (2016). Social influence and the invocation of rights: The effects of accountability, reputation and political skill on legal claiming. Human Relations, 69(12), 2250–2273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716642506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagens, I. H. (2018). What does human resource management look like at a crowdsourcing platform? An explorative case study [Master’s thesis]. University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, B. (2017). Uber, lyft, and regulating the sharing economy. Seattle University Law Review, 41, 269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2015). A proposal for modernizing labor laws for twenty-first-century work: The “independent worker.” Hamilton Project.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. M. (2011). Employee or entrepreneur. Washington & Lee Law Review, 68, 353–367.
   Google Scholar
• Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. (2007). Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—Job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(special_issue), 24–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2013, April). Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 611–620). New York: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Jabagi, N., Croteau, A. M., Audebrand, L. K., & Marsan, J. (2019). Gig-workers’ motivation: Thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M. H., Sutherland, W., Nelson, S. B., & Sawyer, S. (2020). Platformic management, boundary resources for gig work, and worker autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 29(1-2), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09368-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, G. (2022). Third way convergence: Comparative lessons of reclassification of gig worker around the world. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 26(1), 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Adam, M., & Benlian, A. (2021). Algoactivistic practices in ridesharing-A topic modeling & grounded theory approach (ECIS 2021 Research Papers. 1). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/1
   Google Scholar
• Kane, K. (2015). The big hidden problem with Uber? Insincere 5-star ratings. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2015/03/bogus-uber-reviews/
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 528). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/46.1.118-a
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, A., & Meijerink, J. (2023). Dynamism and realignment in the HR architecture: Online labor platform ecosystems and the key role of contractors. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, M. G., Harms, P., & Tay, L. (2019). Mechanical Turk and the gig economy: Exploring differences between gig workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, F. N., & Thiagarajan, S. (1989). What is an incentive system? Performance + Instruction, 28(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4170280304
   Google Scholar
• Kraav, S.-L., Awoyemi, O., Junttila, N., Vornanen, R., Kauhanen, J., Toikko, T., Lehto, S. M., Hantunen, S., & Tolmunen, T. (2021). The effects of loneliness and social isolation on all-cause, injury, cancer, and CVD mortality in a cohort of middle-aged Finnish men. A prospective study. Aging & Mental Health, 25(12), 2219–2228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1830945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S., Solomon, G. E., Youtie, J., & Porter, A. L. (2017). A measure of knowledge flow between specific fields: Implications of interdisciplinarity for impact and funding. PLoS One, 12(10), e0185583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leana, C. R., & Meuris, J. (2015). Living to work and working to live: Income as a driver of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 55–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledford, H. (2015). How to solve the world’s biggest problems. Nature, 525(7569), 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1038/525308a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S. (1999). Technology’s effect on work-life balance. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(7), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeit.1999.00323gab.014
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory?. New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000
   Google Scholar
• Libby, T., Salterio, S. E., & Webb, A. (2004). The balanced scorecard: The effects of ­assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1075–1094. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, N. (2021). Uber loses gig workers rights challenge in UK Supreme Court. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/19/uber-loses-gig-workers-rights-challenge-in-uk-supreme-court/
   Google Scholar
• Maffie, M. D. (2022). The perils of laundering control through customers: A study of control and resistance in the ride-hail industry. ILR Review, 75(2), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920972679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2022). Happily unaccountable? Perceptions of accountability by public managers. Public Policy and Administration, 38(4), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767221074487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männis, M. (2020). In house legal. https://inhouse-legal.eu/public-policy-regulations/uber-france/#:∼:text=Similarly%2C%20the%20European%20Court%20of,rather%20than%20a%20technology%20company.&text=In%20contrast%2C%20US%20Federal%20Labor,are%20independent%20contractors%2C%20not%20employees.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson, J. H., Meyer, M. A., Ghariabeh, N., Hendricks, M., Lee, R. J., Musharrat, S., Newman, G., Sansom, G., & Zandt, S. V. (2019). Interdisciplinary citizen science and design projects for hazard and disaster education. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 37(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701903700102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsakis, L., & Rosenberg, I. (2022, May 28). Starbucks’ crowd-sourced store reviews leave workers feeling shame, employees say. NBC. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/starbucks-connection-scores-customer-whims-rcna29315
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J., Franczak, J., Gonzalez, K., Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Jordan, S. L., Wikhamn, W., Khan, A. K., & Babalola, M. T. (2023). Supervisor off-work boundary infringements: Perspective-taking as a resource for after-hours intrusions. Work & Stress, 37(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2023.2176945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, A., Carbery, R., Burgess, J., & Sherman, U. (2021). Technologically mediated human resource management in the gig economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 3995–4015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1986109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, J., Boons, M., Keegan, A., & Marler, J. (2021). Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2545–2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1925326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, J., & Keegan, A. (2019). Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy: Toward a platform ecosystem perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated identities and vocabularies of motives. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
   Google Scholar
• Mollick, E. R., & Rothbard, N. (2014). Mandatory fun: Consent, gamification and the impact of games at work. The Wharton School Research Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277103
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, K., Richards, J., & Sang, K. (2021). Job quality, fair work and gig work: The lived experience of gig workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 4110–4135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newlands, G. (2021). Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A., & Nestorov, S. (2021). The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: Organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 4053–4077. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki, S., & Sue, S. (1995). Methodological issues in assessment research with ethnic minorities. Psychological Assessment, 7, 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.367
   Google Scholar
• Oppegaard, S. M. N. (2020). Regulating flexibility: Uber’s platform as a technological work arrangement. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 11(1), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.122197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oranburg, S. C. (2018). Unbundling employment: Flexible benefits for the gig economy. Drexel Law Review, 11, 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2006). The web of managerial accountability: The impact of reinventing government. Administration & Society, 38(2), 166–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705285990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, P., & Patel, C. (2022). Formal accountability, perceived accountability and aggressive reporting judgements. Accounting and Business Research, 52(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1836469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parth, S., & Bathini, D. R. (2021). Microtargeting control: Explicating algorithmic control and nudges in platform-mediated cab driving in India. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, S. V., Tetlock, P. E., & Mellers, B. A. (2017). Accountability systems and group norms: Balancing the risks of mindless conformity and reckless deviation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patulny, R., Mills, K. A., Olson, R. E., Bellocchi, A., & McKenzie, J. (2020). The emotional trade-off between meaningful and precarious work in new economies. Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320934156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy: How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, R. (2017, April 26). Uber just updated its rating system to make nice with drivers. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/4035767/uber-just-updated-its-rating-system-to-make-nice-with-drivers
   Google Scholar
• Redfearn, R. L., III. (2016). Sharing economy misclassification: Employees and independent contractors in transportation network companies. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31, 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Retelny, D., Bernstein, M. S., & Valentine, M. A. (2017). No workflow can ever be enough: How crowdsourcing workflows constrain complex work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134724
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. C. (2017). Making a digital working class: Uber drivers in Boston, 2016-2017 [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rockmann, K. W., & Ballinger, G. A. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and organizational identification among on-demand workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolandsson, B., Saloniemi, A., & Saari, T. (2020). High-skilled platform work in Finland and Sweden–the case of technical translators. In K. Jesnes & S. Oppegaard (Eds.), Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, Cases and Responses, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Cross pressures of accountability: Initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., & Hwang, T. (2016). Regional diversity in autonomy and work: A case study from Uber and Lyft drivers. Intelligence and Autonomy, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiber, N. (2017). How Uber uses psychological tricks to push its drivers’ buttons. The New York Times, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49(5-6), 833–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenfeld, M. (2002). Cognitive loafing, social conformity, and judicial review of agency rulemaking. Cornell Law Review, 87, 486–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, M., Irani, L., & Ross, J. (2010). Ethics and tactics of professional crowdwork. XRDS: Crossroads, the ACM Magazine for Students, 17(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1869086.1869100
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2007). Social identity and the attitude–behaviour relationship: Effects of anonymity and accountability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon, O. (2018, January 31). Amazon patents wristband that tracks warehouse workers’ movements. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/31/amazon-warehouse-wristband-tracking
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332
   Google Scholar
• Steinberger, B. Z. (2017). Redefining employee in the gig economy: Shielding workers from the Uber model. Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 23, 577–596.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, V. R., Snyder, D. G., & Kou, C. Y. (2021). We hold ourselves accountable: A relational view of team accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(3), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04969-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 297–332.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331–376). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60287-7
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thordarson, K. (2021). AB-5 and drive: Worker classification in the gig economy. Hastings Business Law Journal, 17, 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & den Dulk, L. (2011). Meaningful work for a meaningful life? Work alienation and its effects in the work and the family context. hdl.handle.net/1765/31286
   Google Scholar
• Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldkirch, M., Bucher, E., Schou, P. K., & Grünwald, E. (2021). Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd–how HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2643–2682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1914129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenstein, J., de Chalendar, A., Reeves, M., & Bailey, A. (2019). The new freelancers: Tapping talent in the gig economy. BCG Henderson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, A. D., & Ragsdell, G. (2012). The impact of e-mail on work-life balance. Aslib Proceedings, 64(2), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211215178
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. (2016). The buck stops where?: Examining leader and collective accountability in teams [Doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Cram, W., & Benlian, A. (2021). Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J. (2021). Algorithmic management consequences for work organisation and working conditions (JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology No. 2021/07), Seville: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment & Society: A Journal of the British Sociological Association, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Z., & Liu, K. (2019). Labor control in the gig economy: Evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619854472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Liu, D. (2021). Decent work for the digital platform workers. A preliminary survey in Beijing. Digital Law Journal, 2(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-1-48-63
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. (2020). Uberizing the legal profession? Lawyer autonomy and status in the digital legal market. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar