Investigating an innovative computer application to improve L2 word recognition from speech

References

• Absalom, M., & Rizzi, A. (2008). Comparing the outcomes of online listening versus online text-based tasks in university level Italian L2 study. ReCALL, 20, 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S., & Williams, J. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, P. (1995). Multimedia for listening comprehension: The design of a multimedia-based resource for developing listening skills. System, 23, 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36, 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H. (2013). Partial dictation as a measure of EFL listening proficiency: Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis. Language Testing, 30, 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, T. (2013). Web Vocabprofile [an adaptation of Heatley & Nation's (1994) Range]. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, P., & Chan, L. (1994). Teaching principles and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (1996). Computerized dictation for assessing listening comprehension. CALICO Journal, 13, 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (1998). Interactive evaluation of listening comprehension: How the context may help. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (1999). Subjects’ reactions to computer-based tests. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23, 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
   Google Scholar
• Feyton, C. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, J. (1999). Key concepts in ELT – bottom-up and top-down. ELT Journal, 53, 338–339.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57, 325–334.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008a). Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 36, 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008b). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008c). Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 411–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gonida, E., Voulala, K., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2009). students' achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Co-examining the role of perceived school goal structures and parent goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Difference, 19, 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2010). Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grezel, J., & Sciarone, A. (1994). Computer testing of listening comprehension. Computers in Education, 23, 125–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grgurović, M., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: students' use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36, 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. (2010). Impact of software design on on-line text reconstruction. System, 28, 370–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heatley, A., & Nation, P. (1994). Range [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/
   Google Scholar
• Hegelheimer, V., & Tower, D. (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32, 185–205.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 413–425.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2007). Psycholinguistic perspectives on language and its acquisition. In J. Cummins & C. Davidson (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching (pp. 783–796). Norwell, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jafarpur, A., & Yamini, M. (1993). Does practice with dictation improve language skills? System, 21, 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (2006). Academic listening: Marrying top and bottom. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Floz (Eds.), Current trends in learning and teaching the four skills within a communicative framework (pp. 91–110). Amsterdam: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and success. In A. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J.M. (2009). Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception. PLoS One, 4(11), e7785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oller, J. (1971). Dictation as a device for testing foreign-language proficiency. ELT Journal, 25, 254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M. (2008). Using dictation to improve language proficiency. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 10(1), 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Roussell, S. (2011). A computer assisted method to track listening strategies in second language learning. ReCALL, 23, 98–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in second language learning. In J. Kroll & A. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 517–556.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M. (2008). Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 24, 435–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trofimovich, P. (2008). What do second language listeners know about spoken words? Effects of experience and attention in spoken word processing. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 37, 309–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19, 432–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. (1988). The value of teletext subtitles in language learning. ELT Journal, 42, 272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. (1990). Paying attention to the words: Practical and theoretical problems in watching television programmes with uni-lingual (CEEFAX) subtitles. System, 18, 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman, Green & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2003). Discovery listening – improving perceptual processing. ELT Journal, 57, 335–343.
   Google Scholar