Type of instructional delivery and second language teacher candidate performance: online versus face-to-face

References

• Alexander, M., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Forbush, D. (2007). Online mathematics methods course evaluation: Student outcomes, generalization, and pupil performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Aragon, S., Johnson, S., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R. (1996). A partnership approach to information technology in initial teacher training. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5, 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, K., & Cloke, C. (1997). Meeting student teachers’ information technology needs in partnership schools. Teacher Development, 1, 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C. 2001. The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Collopy, R., & Arnold, J. (2009). To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cuckle, P., & Clarke, S. (2002). Mentoring student-teachers in schools: Views, practices and access to ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMario, N.C., & Heinze, T. (2001). The status of distance education in personnel preparation programs in visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 525–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Wallace, M. (2002). Assessing online technology: Entertainment or desk-top-rubbishing. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 44(1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ebsworth, M.E., Kim, A.J., & Klein, T.J. (2010). Projections: From a graduate TELL class to the practical world of L2 teachers. Calico Journal, 27, 349–375.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertler, S., Bollen, M., & Gaff, J. (2012). Students’ readiness for and attitudes toward hybrid FL instruction. Calico Journal, 29, 297–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Knox, J. (2009). Issues in the education of TESOL teachers by distance education. Distance Education, 30(1), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, T., & Parker, R. (1995). The contribution of a face-to-face component in initial teacher training at a distance. In R. Howard, & I. McGrath (Eds.), Distance education for language teachers: A UK perspective (pp. 66–77). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hoven, D.L. (2007). The affordances of technology for student teachers to shape their teacher education experience. In M.A. Kassen, R. Lavine, K.A. Murphy-Judy, & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (pp. 133–162). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), Texas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25, 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Huhn, C. (2012). In search of innovation: Research on effective models of foreign language teacher preparation. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (2004). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/Interstate_Teacher_Assessment_Consortium_%28InTASC%29.html
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S. (2008). The effects of integrating technology, observation and writing into teacher education method course. Computers & Education, 50, 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kirtman, L. (2009). Online versus in-class courses: An examination of differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S. (2011). Perceptions of self efficacy for two types of second language methods instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning: An International Journal, 25(4), 295–317. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2011.587436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissau, S., Algozzine, B., & Yon, M. (2012). Similar but different: The beliefs of foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 580–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, D., & Sung, C. (2009). Comparing student performance online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Legutko, R.S. (2007). Face-to-face or cyberspace: Analysis of course delivery in a graduate educational research course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 288–294. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/legutko.htm
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2007). Limited English proficiency enrollment and rapidly rising costs. Report by the Federation for American Immigration Reform. Retrieved from http://www.fairus.org/site/DocServer/LEP_Special_Report.pdf?docID%C2%BC1581
   Google Scholar
• Martinovic, D., & Zhang, Z., (2011). Situating ICT in the teacher education program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, I. (1995). Pre-service training for language teachers: Face-to-face or at a distance? In R. Howard, & I. McGrath (Eds.), Distance education for language teachers: A UK perspective (pp. 66–77). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1994). Administrative barriers to adoption of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions, 2006–2007. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009044
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, L. (2010). The effects of an internationalized university experience on domestic students in the United States and Australia. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pray, L., & Marx, S. (2010). ESL teacher education abroad and at home: A cautionary tale. Teacher Educator, 45(3), 216–229.
   Google Scholar
• Stanosheck Youngs, C., & Youngs, G. (2001). Predictors of mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 97–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujo de Montes, L.E., & Gonzales, C.L. (2000). Been there, done that: Reaching teachers through distance education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 351–371.
   Google Scholar