Developing and evaluating a Chinese collocation retrieval tool for CFL students and teachers

References

• Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21, 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Baroni, M., Kilgarriff, A., Pomikálek, J., & Rychlý, P. (2006). WebBootCaT: Instant domain-specific corpora to support human translators. Proceedings of 11th Annual Conference of the European Association of Machine Translation (pp. 247–252), Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. (2004). Popularising corpus consultation among language learners and teachers. Paper presented at TALC (Teaching and Language Corpora) Conference, University of Granada, Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning and Technology, 9(2), 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, T.P. (2004). Effects of CALL approaches on CFL college students’ learning of verb-noun collocations (Unpublished master's thesis). National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T., & Liou, H. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on CFL students’ learning of verb-noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H-J. (2011). Developing and evaluating a web-based collocation retrieval tool for EFL students and teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conzett, J. (2000). Integrating collocation into a reading and writing course. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 70–86). London: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
   Google Scholar
• Farghal, M., & Obiedat, H. (1995). Collocations: A neglected variable in EFL. IRAL, 33(4), 315–333.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, J.R. (1957). Modes of meaning. In J.R. Firth (Ed.), Papers in Linguistics 1934–51 (pp. 190–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitsaki, C. (1996). The development of ESL collocational knowledge ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Center for Language Teaching and Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced CFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, Z. (2009). Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning (CALL)? Speech Communication, 51(10), 906–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Lewis, M., & Lewis M. (2000). Classroom strategies, activities, and exercises. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 88–117). London: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data driven learning materials. ELR Journal, 4, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocation: Further development in lexical approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (1995). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, A., & Farr, F. (2003). Using language corpora in language teacher education: Pedagogic, linguistic and cultural insights. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 389–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Collocations Dictionary For Students of English (2nd ed.). (2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory. In J.C. Richards, & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2004). English collocation studies: The OSTI report. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y.C., & Wang, L.Y. (2003). Concordancers in the CFL classroom: Cognitive approaches and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.F., & Chen, K.J. (2003). Context-rule model for POS tagging. Proceedings of PACLIC, 17, 146–151.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.F., & Chen, K.J. (2004). Reliable and cost-effective POS-tagging. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 9(1), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, G. (2000). Collocation: Encouraging learner independence. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 28–46). London: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Franken, M., & Witten, I.H. (2010). Supporting collocation learning with a digital library. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y., Liou, H.C., & Li, Y.H. (2007). Online synonym materials and concordancing for EFL college writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar