Examining the impact of online labeling on tutoring behavior and its effect on the English learning and motivation of low-achieving university students

References

• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J.B., Bangert, B., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (COI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K.P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghmans, I., Neckebroeck, F., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2012). A typology of approaches to peer tutoring: Unraveling peer tutors’ behavioral strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 703–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comas-Quinn, A., de los Arcos, B., & Mardomingo, R. (2012). Virtual learning environments (VLEs) for distance language learning: Shifting tutor roles in a contested space for interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2), 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (1991). Six thinking hats for schools: Resource book for adult educators. Logan, IA: USA Perfection Learning.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008a). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50(1), 207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008b). Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Studying the impact of tutors labelling their interventions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 24(6), 462–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2009). Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: A study of the evolution in tutor support. Instructional Science, 37(1), 87–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2010). Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1167–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, B, Watland, P., Pirotte, S., & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor. Networked Learning Conference 2004. Retrieved September 2, 2012, from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/symposia/symposium6/denis_et_al.htm
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., Person, N., & Magliano, J. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkridge, D., & Wheeler, M. (2010). Tutoring at a distance, online tutoring and tutoring in second life. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Short paper presented at the European Distance and e-Learning Network Conference (EDEN 2009), June 2009, Gdansk, Poland. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2010/Hawkridge_Wheeler.pdf (15/01/2011 ).
   Google Scholar
• Kassarjian, H.H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(6), 8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., Matteucci, M.C., & Tomasetto, C. (2012). E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An exploratory study of experienced and non-experienced e-tutors. Computers & Education, 58(1), 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2000). A model for CMC in education and training. E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2002) E-tivities: The key to active learning online. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J.M., & Coulthard, M.R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Richardson, J.C., Ice, P., Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(24), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M (2011). Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1030–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chen, N.-S., & Levy, M. (2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers’ learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37–65.
   Google Scholar