Use of computer technology for English language learning: do learning styles, gender, and age matter?

References

• Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishka, A. (2010). Learning styles fray: Brilliant or batty? Performance Improvement, 49, 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bolye, E.A., Duffy, T., & Dunleavy, K. (2003). Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt's Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 267–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24, 419–444.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C.A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, C. (2007). Autonomy in language learning. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 42–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliason, P.A. (1995). Difficulties with cross-cultural learning styles assessment. In J.M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL classroom (pp. 19–33). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2006). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davis & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525–551). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R.M., & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garger, S., & Guild, P. (1984). Learning styles: The crucial differences. Curriculum Review, 23, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Golonka, E.M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D.L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groβ, A., & Wolff, D. (2001). A multimedia tool to develop learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3–4), 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Gruba, P. (2006). Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). In A. Davis & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 623–648). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, F., Tomkinson, B., Hiley, A., & Dobson, H. (2014). Learning style preferences: An examination of differences amongst students with different disciplinary backgrounds. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.961504
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1993). Culture and learning: A study of the learning style preferences of Japanese students. RELC Journal, 24, 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2005). LISREL 8.72 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Karthigenyan, K., & Nirmala, K. (2013). Learning style preference of English language learners. Educationia Confab, 2(1), 134–140.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J.W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, P.A., & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48, 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A. (1984a). Learning style inventory and technical manual. Boston, MA: McBer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A. (1984b). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2011). New dimension of self-directed learning in an open-networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C., & Gu, M.Y. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2012). An exploratory study of second language learners' preference and perceptions of face-to-face, hybrid and online consultation modes. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 323–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Cheung, W.K.W., Wong, K.C.K., & Lee, F.S.L. (2013). Immediate web-based essay critiquing system feedback and teacher follow up feedback on young second language learners' writings: An experimental study in a Hong Kong secondary school. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computer and Education, 48, 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, D. (2010). A salutary lesson from a computer-based self-access language learning project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 343–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., Tracey, D., & Craven, R.G. (2006). Multidimensional self-concept structure for preadolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: A hybrid multigroup-MIMIC approach to factorial invariance and latent mean differences. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 705–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E. (2011). Does styles research have useful implications for educational practice? Learning & Individual Differences, 21, 319–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M.G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decision: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53, 375–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P.L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nematipour, M. (2012). A study of Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy level and its relationship with learning style. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2009). When will learning style go out of style? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, C.S., & Lai, J.Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pena, M.I., & Yeung, A.S. (2009). University students' satisfaction with online and face-to-face Spanish learning. International Journal of Learning, 16, 637–648.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Riener, C., & Willingham, D. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change, 42, 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi-Le, L. (1995). Learning styles and strategies in adult immigrant ESL students. In J.M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 118–125). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2010). The enduring appeal of “learning styles”. Australian Journal of Education, 54, 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins, C. (1995). Culture-specific perceptual-learning-style preferences of postsecondary students of English as a second language. In J.M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 108–117). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2012). Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics and Science teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content teaching. Language Teaching Research, 15, 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinder, R. (2013). Business students' beliefs about language learning in a university context. English for Specific Purposes, 32, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Pscyhometrika, 88(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Waes, L., van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2014). Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process. Computers and Education, 73, 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J.D.H.M. (1994). Inventory of learning styles in higher education: Scoring key for the inventory of learning styles in higher education. Tilburg: Department of Educational Psychology, Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2005). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers and Education, 45, 35–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.S., Wu, M.C., & Wang, H.Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2000). Learning styles. Mudgeeraba: Team Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, A.S., Taylor, P.G., Hui, C., Lam-Chiang, A.C., & Low, E-L. (2012). Mandatory use of technology in teaching: Who cares and so what? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 859–870. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar