Design for CALL – possible synergies between CALL and design for learning

References

• Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 41–61). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, M. D. (2010). Born in Zanzibar, computerized in Provo, Utah: A systematic instructional design approach for Swahili CALL. CALICO Journal, 27(3), 505–516.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014b). Synthesis: Set design, epistemic design and the functioning of learning networks. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 482–514). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2014a). The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 482–514). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W-C., Shih, Y-C. D., & Liu, G-Z. (2015). Task design and its induced learning effects in a cross-institutional blog-mediated telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 285–305, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.818557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collentine, K. (2009). Learner use of holistic language units in multimodal, task-based synchronous computer-mediate communication. Language Learning and Technology, 13, 68–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2004). Design of online interactive language courseware: Conceptualization, specification and prototyping. Research into the impact of linguistic-didactic functionality on software architecture (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, 2004, 342 p. UMI micropublication number 3141560. Retrieved fromwww.didascalia.be/doc-design.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 477–497.
   Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2015). Welcome. Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference: Task design and CALL. 6-8 July (pp. 5–6). Tarragona: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas-Claros, M. S. (2015). Design considerations of help options in computer-based L2 listening materials informed by participatory design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 429–449, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.881385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Otto, S. E. K., & Ruschoff, B. (2012). Historical perspectives on CALL. In M. Thomas., H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer, M (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525–552). New Rork, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, Y., & Goodyear, P. (2013). Forward-oriented design for learning: Illustrating the approach. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–13. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20290
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galley, R., Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2011). Indicators of community table – Presentation transcript. Retrieved from www.slideshare.net/OULDI/indicators-of-community-table
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conference in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. (2015). Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 280–299. doi:10.1111/bjet.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimeno-Sanz, A. (2016). Moving a step further from “integrative CALL”. What's to come? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1102–1115, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1103271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzáles-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En Busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, M. (2014). The need for needs analysis in technology-mediated TBLT. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 23–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.6.02gon
   Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tblt.6.01gon
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (1993). Foundations for courseware engineering. In R. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development and delivery (pp. 7–28). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools for the design of complex instructional systems. In S. Dijkstr, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Chapter 5). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2000). Environments for lifelong learning: Ergonomics, architecture and educational design. In M. J. Spector & T. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction & technology: Understanding complexity (1–18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Online), 21(1), 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2013). The analysis of complex learning environments. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). (pp. 49–63). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014a). Introduction: Networked learning and learning networks. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 30–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014b). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 115–157). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21 (Supplement 1), 1–13. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2012). Pedagogic Designs, Technology and Practice-Based Education. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 131–144). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (2010). Learning, technology and design. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 1–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121. doi: 10.1017/S0958344006000711
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (2009). Training teachers for the multimedia age: Developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 35–50, doi: 10.1080/17501220802655425
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (2010). Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 131–153). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, M., & Warnecke, S. (2012). Materials design in CALL: Social presence in online environments. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer assisted language learning (pp. 95–115). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hémard, D., & Cushion, S. (2001). Evaluation of a Web-based language learning environment: The importance of a user-centred design approach for CALL. ReCALL, 13(1), 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2011). Researching design practices and design cognition: Contexts, experiences and pedagogical knowledge-in-pieces. Learning, Media, & Technology, 36(2), 129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapper, J. (2003). Taking Communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 27, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kuure, L., Molin-Juustila, T., Keisanen, T., Riekki, M., Iivari, N., & Kinnula, M. (2016). Switching perspectives: From a language teacher to a designer of language learning with new technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 925–941, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1068815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, M. (2012). Distance CALL online. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 141–158). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14(1), 58–84. doi: 10.1017/S0958344002000617
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., Hubbard, P., Stockwell, G., & Colpaert, J. (2015). Research challenges in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.987035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (2001). Embedding AIED in ie-TV through Broadband User Modelling (BbUM). In J. Moore, W. L. Johnson, & C. L. Redfield (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education in the wired and wireless future (pp. 322–333). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., Clark, W., & Underwood, I. (2013). The ecology of resources: A theoretically grounded framework for designing next generation technology-rich learning. In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, S. Puntambekar, N. Winters, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp.33–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., du Boulay, B., Underwood, J., Holmberg, J., Kerawalla, L., O'Connor, J., Smith, H., & Tunley, H. (2006). Designing educational systems fit for use: A case study in the application of human centred design for AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 353–380.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Maldonado, R., Dimitriadis, Y., Kay, J., Yacef, K., & Edbauer, M.-T. (2012). Orchestrating a multi- tabletop classroom: From activity design to enactment and reflection. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS ‘12) (pp. 119–128). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2396636&picked=prox&cfid=670299773&cftoken=13498458
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., & Goodyear, P. (2007). Representing practitioner experiences through learning design and patterns. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (2nd Ed.). (pp. 92–102). London: Routledge imprint of Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., & Goodyear, P. (2013). Representing practitioner experiences through learning design and patterns. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 133–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2/3), 216–242.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S. (2013). Designing and researching technology-enhanced learning for the zone of proximal implementation. Research in Learning Technology, 21(Supplement), 1–9. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17374
   Google Scholar
• Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2007). Learning to orchestrate online instructional conversations: A case of faculty development for foreign language educators. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 5–19, doi: 10.1080/09588220601118487
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (2001). How to improve the impact of short courses and workshops (2001). Training & professional development. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2007). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., Craft, B., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2013). The art and science of learning design. Research in Learning Technology, 21(Supplement), 1–8. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22513
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Hartmann, A., & Ditfurth, M. S. (2010). Research on the use of technology in task-based language teaching. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 17–40). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, D. (2013). Student evaluation of CALL tools during the design process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 371–387, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.680471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolajsen, H. W., & Ryberg, T. (2014). Creating a peer-driven learning network in higher education. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 194–220). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L., & González-Lloret, M. (2015). In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT. A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 59–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (1998). Creating hypermedia learning environments: Guidelines for designers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.11.2.115.5687
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2000). Directions for development in hypermedia design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 253–269, doi: 10.1076/0958-8221(200007)13:3;1-3;FT253
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Darasawang, P. (2012). Diversity in Learner support. In G. Stockwell (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 49–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Classroom orchestration: synthesis. Computers & Education, 69, 523–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein-Fisch, C., & Trumbull, E. (2008). Managing diverse classrooms. ASCD. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org
   Google Scholar
• Samuda, V. (2015). Task, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT. A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 271–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18–42, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.891428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S. Y. H. (2016). Learntime and learning place-focused forward-oriented design for learning in technology-enhanced classrooms. Distance Education, 37(3), 349–365, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1233051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (2010). Deconstructing tasks and technology. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 1–16). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (2012). Contemporary computer-assisted language learning: The role of digital media and incremental change. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 1–12). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview, Language Teaching, 31, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• White, C. (2006). State-of-the-art review article: The distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching, 39, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, K. A. (2011). Blending theories for instructional design: Creating and implementing the structure, environment, experience, and people (SEEP) model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 371–382, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.572900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P., Pan, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Z., Shi, Q., Chu, W., ... Zhu, Z. (2016). User-centred design for Chinese-oriented spoken English learning system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 984–999, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1121877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar