Understanding the nature of learners’ out-of-class language learning experience with technology

References

• Alajmi, M. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies adoption in Kuwait. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas, USA: University of North Texas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Ala-Kyyny, J. (2012). The role of English-language music in informal learning of English (Unpublished master thesis). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Barbee, M. (2013). Extracurricular L2 input in a Japanese EFL context: Exposure, attitudes, and motivation. University of Hawaii Second Language Studies Paper, 32, 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson & H. Reinders ( Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7–16). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 839–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, D.A., & LaCroix-Dalluhn, L. (2011). Expanded learning time and opportunities: Key principles, driving perspectives, and major challenges. New Directions for Youth Development, 131, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E.G., & McIver, J.P. (1983). An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables. Political Methodology, 9, 51–102.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, S., Arkın, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL learners' use of ICT for self-regulated learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8, 98–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the present-day advantages of informal out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G. (2008). Listening to the learner voice: The ever changing landscape of technology use for language students. ReCALL, 20, 124–140.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. (2008). What are web 2.0 technologies, and why do they matter. In N. Selwyn ( Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning (pp. 6–9). London: TLRP.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K., & James, C. (2013). Tweens' conceptions of privacy online: Implications for educators. Learning, Media and Technology, 38, 4–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekşȋ, G., & Aydın, H. (2013). What are the students doing ‘out’ there? An investigation of out-of-class language learning activities. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13, 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerlund, T. (2012). Learning and using English and Swedish beyond the classroom: Activity systems of six upper secondary school students (Unpublished master thesis. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, K.S. (2005). Faceless students, virtual places: Emergence and communal accountability in online classrooms. Computers and Composition, 22, 149–176.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Chang, S., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Use of social web technologies by international and domestic undergraduate students: Implications for internationalising learning and teaching in Australian universities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19, 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2013). Autonomy and foreign language learning in a virtual learning environment. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2015). Mobile informal language learning: Exploring Welsh Learners’ practices. eLearning Papers, 45, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 14406.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppens, A.H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 65–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2013). A framework of developing self-directed use of technology for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2015a). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: Accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2015b). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82(1), 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C. & Gu, M. Y. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Zhu, W. M., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, B. (2012). English out-of-school activities-a way of integrating outwards? (Unpublished master thesis). University of Gävle, Gävle.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Yeung, A.S., & Ip, T. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language learning: Do learning styles, gender, and age matter? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 1033–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S. (2007). Youth language in media contexts: Insights into the functions of English in Finland. World Englishes, 26(2), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. (2013). Between the social and the selfish: Learner autonomy in online environments. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 198–212.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Snow, C., & White, C. (2015). Urban adolescent students and technology: Access, use and interest in learning language and literacy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 143–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 124–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranto, G., & Barton, M. (2010). Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 27, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Marefat, F., & Barbari, F. (2009). The relationship between out-of-class language learning strategy use and reading comprehension ability. Porta Linguarum, 12, 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Olmedo, M.I. (2015). English language learning beyond the classroom walls ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Palviainen, Å (2012). Lärande som diskursnexus: Finska studenters uppfattningar om skoltid, fritid och universitetsstudier som lärokontexter för svenska. Nordisk tidskrift for andrespråksforskning, Nr 1-2012, 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pinner, R.S. (2014). The authenticity continuum: Empowering international voices. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J.C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, N.S.M., Yunus, M.M., & Embi, M.A. (2013). Research on international students in traditional host countries and Malaysia: Some potential areas in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 488–496.
   Google Scholar
• Sackey, D.J., Nguyen, M.T., & Grabill, J.T. (2015). Constructing learning spaces: What we can learn from studies of informal learning online. Computers and Composition, 35, 112–124.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spence-Brown, R. (2001). The eye of the beholder: Authenticity in an embedded assessment task. Language Testing, 18(4), 463–481.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, C.H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25, 306–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M.P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27, 233–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P. (2011). A possible path to progress: Out-of-school English language learners in Sweden. In P. Benson & H. Reinders ( Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp.106–118). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L.K. (2014). Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL, 26, 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L.K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24, 302–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S.L., & Reinhardt, J. (2008). “Bridging activities,” new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25, 558–572.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S.L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. ASp. la revue du GERAS, 58, 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, R. (2016). Blending technology and face-to-face: Advanced students’ choices. ReCALL, 28, 83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M.D., Rana, N.P., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28, 443–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M.M.F. (2012). Beliefs and out-of-class language learning of Chinese-speaking ESL learners in Hong Kong. New Horizons in Education, 60, 35–52.
   Google Scholar