Using google translate in EFL drafts: a preliminary investigation

References

• Abdel-Hack, I. M. (2002). The effectiveness of a task-based learning approach on EFL students’ writing production. Occasional Papers in the Language Education Center for Developing of English Language Teaching CDELT, 34, 193–231.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. (2016). Using facebook to develop grammar discussion and writing skills in english as a foreign language for university students. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(12), 932–952.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, M., & Ghosh, K. (2009). Automatic translation in multilingual business meetings. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(7), 916–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqurashi, F. (2015). Perspectives of Saudi EFL learners towards teacher response in writing courses. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(5), 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsamadani, H. A. (2017). The effectiveness of using online blogging for students’ individual and group writing. International Education Studies, 11(1), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, I. Z. (2000). The effect of using peer review groups in teaching essay writing to fourth year English majors, Faculty of Education, on their writing performance, apprehension, revising and attitudes. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 14(1), 94–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ard, J. (1982). The use of bilingual dictionaries by ESL students while writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 58, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Aston, G. (2001). Learning with corpora: An overview. In G. Aston (Ed.), Learning with corpora (pp. 6–45). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
   Google Scholar
• Bakry, M. S., & Alsamadani, H. A. (2015). Improving the persuasive essay writing of students of Arabic as a foreign language (AFL): Effects of self-regulated strategy development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, S., & Hale, J. (2003). Improving students writing through different writing styles. M. A. Action Research Project. Saint Xavier University and Skylight Professional Development Field-Based Master's Program. Retrieved from IRI\Skylight Field Based Master’s Program.
   Google Scholar
• Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Romero-Forteza, F. (2014). Second language writing: Use of the world wide web to improve specific writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. L., & Sun, Y. C. (2009). Scaffolding and web concordancers as support for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Acosta, S., & Barry, A. E. (2016). Evaluating the accuracy of Google translate for diabetes education material. JMIR Diabetes, 1(1), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. V. (2004). EFL learners’ use of print and online dictionaries in L1 and L2 writing processes. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 7(1), 9–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., & Brooks‐Carson, A. (2001). Research on direct versus translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching: An argument for reassessment. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corder, P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 19–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakar, B. S., Sinha, S. K., & Pandey, K. K. (2013). A survey of translation quality of English to Hindi online translation systems (Google and Bing). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Druce, P. M. (2012). Attitude to the use of L1 and translation in second language teaching and learning. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 60–86.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, I. (2011). Translating by post-editing: is it the way forward? Machine Translation, 25(3), 217–237.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, I., & Pena, M. I. (2011). Machine translation-assisted language learning: Writing for beginners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 471–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granath, S. (2009). Who benefits from learning how to use corpora? In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 47–65). Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, M. J., & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., Bederson, B., & Rensik, P. (2010). Translation by iterative collaboration between monolingual users. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, May 31–June 2, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. pp. 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2017). The role of translation technologies in Spanish language learning. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 4(2), 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, L., & Deifell, E. (2013). Foreign language learners’ use and perception of online dictionaries: A survey study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 515–533.
   Google Scholar
• Klimova, B. F. (2011). Making academic writing real with ICT. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen, M. (2016). Is machine translation post-editing worth the effort? A survey of research into post-editing and effort. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Le, Q. V., & Schuster, M. (2016, September 26). A neural network for machine translation, at production scale. Google Research Blog. Retrieved from https://research.googleblog.com/2016/09/a-neural-network-for-machine.html
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, V. (2010). The role of pedagogical translation in second language acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Steel, C. (2015). Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(02), 177–196.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, J., & Myles, J. (2003). Capturing phraseology in an online dictionary for advanced users of English as a second language: A response to user needs. System, 31(1), 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mundt, K., & Groves, M. J. (2016). A double-edged sword: the merits and the policy implications of Google Translate in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nesi, H., & Meara, P. (1994). Patterns of misinterpretation in the productive use of EFL dictionary definitions. System, 22(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Okasha, M. A., & Hamdi, S. A. (2014). Using strategic writing techniques for promoting EFL writing skills and attitudes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 674–681.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom. Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, E., & Aydin, S. (2015). The effects of blogging on EFL writing achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 372–380.
   Google Scholar
• Reppen, R. (2009). Using corpora in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, P., Buzek, O., Hu, C., Kronrod, Y., Quinn, A. & Bederson, (2010). Improving translation via targeted paraphrasing. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, MIT, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Roohani, A., & Khosravi, A. (2011). An investigation into bilingual dictionary use: Do the frequency of use and type of dictionary make a difference in L2 writing performance? The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 3(2), 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Salma, U. (2015). Problems and practical needs of writing skill in EFL context: An analysis of Iranian students of Aligarh Muslim University. IOSR Journal Of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(11), 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, A. (2010). Scaffolding an EFL (English as a Foreign Language) effective writing class in hybrid learning community. Unpublished Doctor’s Thesis. Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, M., Johnson, M., & Thorat, N. (2016, November 22). Zero-shot translation with Google’s multilingual neural machine translation system. Google Research Blog. Retrieved from https://research.googleblog.com/2016/11/zero-shot-translation-with-googles.html
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M. (2004). How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolik, M. (2003). Writing. In D. Nunan (Eds.), Practical English language teaching (PELT), (pp. 87–88). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Statt, N. (2016, September 27). Google’s AI translation system is approaching human-level accuracy. THE VERGE. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/27/13078138/google-translate-ai-machine-learning-gnmt.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. C. (2013). EFL business writing with task-based learning approach: A case study of student strategies to overcome difficulties. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (KUAS), 10(2), 217–238.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. C. (2017). Effectiveness of ESL students’ performance by computational assessment and role of reading strategies in courseware-implemented business translation tasks. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 474–487. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1313744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzawa. K. (1996). Second language learners' processes of L1 writing, L2 writing, and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 271–294.
   Google Scholar
• van Rensburg, A., Snyman, C., & Lotz, S. (2012). Applying Google Translate in a higher education environment: Translation products assessed. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 30(4), 511–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijen, D., Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 235–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., … Dean, J. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.08144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. (2008). More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusof, J., Manan, N. A. A., & Alias, A. A. (2012). Guided peer feedback on academic writing tasks using Facebook notes: An exploratory study. Paper presented at The 3rd International Conference on E-Learning ICEL 2011, Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 216–228.
   Google Scholar