EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context

References

• Bao, D. (2014). Understanding silence and reticence: Ways of participating in second language acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Barrs, K. (2012). Fostering computer-mediated L2 interaction beyond the classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 10–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom: The theory and practice of informed language learning and teaching (pp. 7–16). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. (M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., & Philip, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480–493.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X.-B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2013). Naturalistic CALL and digital gaming. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 834–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2014). Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I.-C. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the present-day advantages of informal, out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comas-Quinn, A., Mardomingo, R., & Valentine, C. (2009). Mobile blogs in language learning: Making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(01), 96–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners' critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189–212.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, W. H. (2015). Transitioning to a communication-oriented pedagogy: Taiwanese university freshmen’s views on class participation. System, 49, 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D.-M. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners' willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Fatemi, A. H., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-Y. (2010). Socio-political influences on EFL motivation and attitudes: Comparative surveys of Korean high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-Y., & Kim, Y.-K. (2016). A quasi-longitudinal study on English learning motivation and attitudes: The case of South Korean students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(2), 138–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-Y., & Kim, Y. M. (2016). EFL learning demotivation in the Korean context: Similarities and differences across school levels. English Language & Literature Teaching, 22(1), 135–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S., McCullough, H., & Pyke, J. G. (2010). Leveling the playing field: The effects of online second language instruction on student willingness to communicate in French. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile Assisted Language Learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y.-J. (2014). Does Second Life improve Mandarin learning by overseas Chinese students? Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 36–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y.-J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). Social anxiety. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2017). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British Journal of Educational Technology, doi:10.1111/bjet.12599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2018). Perceptions of English as an International Language by Korean English-major and non-English-major students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1480628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., Nakamura, Y., & Sadler, R. (2018). Effects of videoconference-embedded classrooms (VEC) on learners’ perceptions toward English as an international language (EIL). ReCALL, 30(03), 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictions of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z. N., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K., Fiske, J., & Kendall, P. O. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. (2012). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471–493.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., Tooley, J., Inamdar, P., & Dixon, P. (2003). Improving English pronunciation: An automated instructional approach. Information Technologies & International Development, 1(1), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2016). The use of massively multiplayer online role-playing games in CALL: An analysis of research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1181–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(04), 561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauro, S. (2017). Online fan practices and CALL. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, M. J. (2002). English fever: Society, politics and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(02), 138–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Franklin, T., & Gao, F. (2017). Learning outside of classroom: Exploring the active part of an informal online English learning community in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in the teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24(03), 302–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2017). Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in extracurricular/extramural contexts. CALICO Journal, 34(1), i–iv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitude and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M. (2011). Effect of communication variables, affective variables, and teacher immediacy on willingness to communicate of foreign language learners. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(02), 218–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y., & Andrews, S. (2014). Washback effects from a high-stakes examination on out-of-class English learning: insights from possible self theories. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 71–89. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.757546
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Q. M. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners’ willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: A multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behavior. System, 41(3), 740–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar