Willingness to communicate in digital and non-digital EFL contexts: scale development and psychometric testing

References

• Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311–341. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (eds.) (2011). Beyond the language classroom. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom: The theory and practice of informed language learning and teaching (pp. 7–16). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2013). Naturalistic CALL and digital gaming. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 834–839. doi:10.1002/tesq.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2014). Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A., & Ho, J. (2017). Learn a language for free: Recreational learning among adults. System, 69, 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ch’ng, L. K., & Samsudin, Z. (2013). Integration of mobile devices into ubiquitous learning by the 21st century teenagers. Education, 3(6), 362–374.
   Google Scholar
• Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (n.d.). Retrieved 14 December, 2017 from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 439–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189–212. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00113.x
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. W. (2009, April 1). Koreans ranked bottom in English proficiency test. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/04/117_42399.html
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S., McCullough, H., & Pyke, J. G. (2010). Leveling the playing field: The effects of online second language instruction on student willingness to communicate in French. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 277–297. doi:10.11139/cj.27.2.277-297
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.889714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703–723. doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2019a). Quantity and diversity of informal digital learning of English. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2019b). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 767–778. doi:10.1111/bjet.12599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445. doi:10.1002/tesq.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., & Kim, H. (2014). An exploratory study on the digital identity formation of Korean University EFL learners. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(3), 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. doi:10.1017/S0272263101003035
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537–564. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictions of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26. doi:10.1177/0261927X960151001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z. N., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D., & Richards, J. C. (eds.) (2015). Language learning beyond the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. (2013). The challenge of measuring willingness to communicate in EFL contexts. The. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 281–290. doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–578. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identify and the L2 self (pp. 120–143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, S., & Zourou, K. (2019). What are the digital wilds?. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, D., & Park, J. S.-Y. (2008). The language politics of "English Fever" in South Korea. Korea Journal, 48(2), 136–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in the teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65–76. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners’ willingness to communicate within a language classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(4), 396–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144–192). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitude and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar