Effectiveness of a digital pen-based learning system with a reward mechanism to improve learners’ metacognitive strategies in listening

References

• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., Quera, V., & Gnisci, A. (2009). Observer agreement for timed-event sequential data: A comparison of time-based and event-based algorithms. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 137–147. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baleghizadeh, S., & Rahimi, A. H. (2011). The relationship among listening performance, metacognitive strategy use and motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(1), 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, C., Plumbley, M. D., Frohlich, D., & Calic, J. (2018). PaperClip: A digital pen interface for semantic speech editing in radio production. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 66(4), 241–252. doi:10.17743/jaes.2018.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas-Claros, M., & Gruba, P. (2009). Help options in CALL: A systematic review. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 69–90. doi:10.11139/cj.27.1.69-90
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., & Gruba, P. A. (2014). Listeners' interactions with help options in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 228–245. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.724425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. K. (2009). Augmenting wiki system for collaborative EFL reading by digital pen annotations. Paper Presented at the 2009 International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality, IEEE, Gwangju, South Korea, 8–11 July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-E., Chang, C.-T., Hou, H.-T., Sung, Y.-T., Chao, H.-L., & Lee, C.-M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & Education, 71, 185–197. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, T., & Trenkic, D. (2015). Speech segmentation in a second language: The role of Bi-modal input. In Y. Gambier, A. Caimi, & C. Mariotti (Eds.), Subtitles and language learning (pp. 173–197). Bern: Peter Lang
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Tan, C. C., & Lo, B. J. (2016). Facilitating English-language learners' oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 96–118. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.817442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y., & Lin, M. (2017). Enhancement of English learning performance by using an attention-based diagnosing and review mechanism in paper-based learning context with digital pen support. Universal Access in the Information Society, Published online: 09 October 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0576-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2017). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 31(1), 51–70. doi:10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (2001). The use of audio or video comprehension as an assessment instrument in the certification of English language teachers: A case study. System, 29(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00057-9
   Google Scholar
• Coskun, A. (2014). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal, 4(1), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151–176. doi:10.1177/1362168809103446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2017). Help options for L2 listening in CALL: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 50(04), 544–560. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000209
   Google Scholar
• Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431–457. doi:10.2307/3586979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnglishCentral Videos (2018). “Denmark's Lego Tech Tour” and “Turkey's Ancient City”. Retrieved from https://www.englishcentral.com/video/23261 and https://www.englishcentral.com/video/23610
   Google Scholar
• Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133–167. doi:10.1191/0265532202lt225oa
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213. doi:10.1177/0033688208092184
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2018). Metacognition in Second Language Listening. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0572
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255–274. doi:10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl002
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower‐intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 747–783. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grgurović, M., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: Students' use ofsubtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayati, A. (2010). The effect of speech rate on listening comprehension of EFL learners. Creative Education, 1(2), 107. doi:10.4236/ce.2010.12016
   Google Scholar
• Hegelheimer, V., & Tower, D. (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32(2), 185–205. doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2004). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40. doi:10.1177/016264340502000103
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Wang, Y., & Young, S. (2012). Exploring elementary school students’ perceptions of applying the talking pen into English learning. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(3), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. (2001). The use and abuse of meaning technologies. Contact, 27: 8–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H.-C., Young, S. S.-C., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). No student left behind: a collaborative and competitive game-based learning environment to reduce the achievement gap of EFL students in Taiwan. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 35–49. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.822412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, E. (2005). The effect of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 505–513. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02517.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.-J., Chang, S.-C., Chen, P.-Y., & Chen, X.-Y. (2018). Effects of integrating an active learning-promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and behaviors. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 451–474. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9567-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., Lai, C. L., & Hsueh, C. J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in language students' English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26–42. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. doi:10.1080/09588220903467335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, W. C., Chao, P. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2007, July). The interactive multimedia textbook: Using a digital pen to support learning for computer programming. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) (pp. 742–746). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G. Z., Chen, J. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Mobile‐based collaborative learning in the fitness center: A case study on the development of English listening comprehension with a context‐aware application. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 305–320. doi:10.1111/bjet.12581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A.D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, K. (2011). The effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 131–154. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.528777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsen, M. A. (2016). The use of help options in multimedia listening environments to aid language learning: a review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1232–1242. doi:10.1111/bjet.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24(4), 517–537. doi:10.1177/0265532207080771
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujolă, J.-T. (2002). CALLing for help: Researching language learning strategies using help facilities in a web-based multimedia program. ReCALL, 14(2), 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Quera, V., Bakeman, R., & Gnisci, A. (2007). Observer agreement for event sequences: Methods andsoftware for sequence alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmatian, R., & Armiun, N. (2011). The effectiveness of audio and video documents in developing listening comprehension skill in a foreign language. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 115.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Verdugo, D., & Alonso Belmonte, I. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can i say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2007). Commentary: I'm only trying to help: A role for interventions in teaching listening. Language learning & technology, 11(1), 102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sarani, A., Behtash, E. Z., & Arani, S. M. N. (2014). The effect of video-based tasks in listening comprehension of Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Gist: Education and Learning Research Journal8, (8 Jan-Jun), 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C.-C., Chen, C.-M., & Lee, H.-M. (2013). Using a paper-based digital pen for supporting English courses in regular classrooms to improve reading fluency. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7(Suppl.), 234–246. doi:10.3366/ijhac.2013.0073
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. K. & Young, S. S. C. (2010). Applying speech techniques to practice listening and speaking skills for EFL learners: an exploratory study. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Gameand Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, Taiwan, 179–181.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students: Through the Process of L2 Listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 425–440. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.3.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89. doi:10.1093/applin/amh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(03), 191–210. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004338
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. (2010). Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language Teaching, 43(01), 1–37. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43. doi:10.1080/00220671.1990.10885988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. C., & Chang, P. (2014). Captions and reduced forms instruction: The impact on EFL students’ listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26(1), 44–61. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeldham, M. (2017). Techniques for researching L2 listeners. System, 66, 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 33–53. doi:10.1177/1362168813505395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, W., & Jeanine, T.-D. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (1997). The Effects of Listeners' Control of Speech Rate on Second Language Comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 49–68. doi:10.1093/applin/18.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar