Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions

References

• Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241–249. doi: 10.1076/call.15.3.241.8189
   Google Scholar
• Aysel, S. K. (2014). Blended instruction for EFL learners: Engagement, learning and course satisfaction. JALTCALL, 10(3), 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533–550. doi: 10.1558/cj.v23i3.533-550
   Google Scholar
• Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2011). Adjunct learning: Mixing the cyber world with face-to-face writing instruction. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 230–239.
   Google Scholar
• Benbunan-Fich, R., & Starr, R. H. (2003). Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(4), 296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & López Pérez, M. V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended learning language course: Students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, T. (2007). Marrying two existing software packages into an efficient online tutoring tool. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 459–468. doi: 10.1080/09588220701746039
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. P. (2004). Using liveJournal for authentic communication in EFL classes. The Internet TESL Journal. 10(9). Retrieved on 3, Oct. from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Campbell-LiveJournal/.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. P. (2010). Communication students’ perceptions of hybrid courses in higher education. Master’s thesis. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (UMIno: 1478922).
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. C. J., & Lo, H. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411. doi: 10.1080/10494820903298662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, N. A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of language online. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 115–145. doi: 10.1558/cj.v24i1.115-146
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. S., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 64–85. doi: 10.5465/amle.2004.12436819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, S. (2013). September 24). Harvard plans to boldly go with “Spocs”. BBC Business News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24166247
   Google Scholar
• Dillon-Marable, E., & Valentine, T. (2006). Optimizing computer technology integration. Adult Basic Education, 16(2), 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hypen. E-Learning, 3(3), 54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (4), 652–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Grgurović, M. (2011). Blended learning in an ESL class: A case study. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 100–117.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M. M., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 81, 315–325. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. X., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. B. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernandez, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(3), 185–199. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motteram, G., & Sharma, P. (2009). Blending learning in a Web 2.0 world. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., Hourigan, T., Jeanneau, C., & Chappell, D. (2005). Netskills and the current state of beliefs and practices in student learning: An assessment and recommendations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 425–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, M.-H. (2017). Learner perspectives regarding device type in technology-assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 844–863. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1367310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(02), 163–178. doi: 10.1017/S0958344005000224
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “Blended Learning” be redeemed? ELearning. 2(1), 17–26. doi: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). ‘I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid’: Exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00860.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamÍrez Verdugo, M. D., & Alonso Belmonte, M. I. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you?. American Agent & Broker, 73(6), 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computer and Education, 61, 209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H., Wang, J. P., Wen, F. J., Wang, J., & Tao, J. Q. (2016). Exploration and practice of blended teaching model based flipped classroom and SPOC in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10), 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Q. (2013). Application of the output-driven hypothesis in college English teaching: Reflections and suggestions. Foreign Language World, 6, 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 95–110. doi: 10.1093/applin/8.2.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. (2014). Preparing language teachers for blended teaching of summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 185–206. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.701633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2010). The perspectives and effectiveness of blended learning in L2 writing of Korean university students. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Liao, B. (2015). Learning on the fingertips: The opportunities and challenges of educational apps. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20), 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar