845
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using patterns-based learning design for CALL tasks

References

  • Albashiry, N. M., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2015). Teacher collaborative curriculum design in technical vocational colleges: A strategy for maintaining curriculum consistency? The Curriculum Journal, 26(4), 601–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1058281
  • Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Avgeriou, P., Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., & Skordalakis, M. (2003). Towards a pattern language for learning management systems. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 11–24.
  • Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 41–61). London: Routledge.
  • Borchers, J. (2001). A pattern approach to interaction design. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Cardenas-Claros, M. S. (2015). Design considerations of help options in computer-based L2 listening materials informed by participatory design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 429–449.
  • Celik, D., & Magoulas, G. D. (2016). A review, timeline, and categorization of learning design tools. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 3–13), Springer International Publishing, Rome.
  • Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22–34.
  • Chatteur, F., Carvalho, L., & Dong, A. (2010). Embedding pedagogical principles and theories into 386 design patterns. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 183–200). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Colpaert, J. (2010). Elicitation of language learners’ personal goals as design concepts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 259–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.513447
  • Colpaert, J. (2015). Welcome. In J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, M. Oberhofer & M. Gutierrez-Colon Plana (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference: Task design and CALL (pp. 5–6). Tarragona: Springer.
  • Colpaert, J. (2018). Transdisciplinarity revisited. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 483–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1437111
  • Conole, G., Brasher, A., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P., & Culver, J. (2008). Visualizing learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International, 45(3), 177–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802284168
  • Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Cross, S., Galley, R., Brasher, A., & Weller, M. (2012). Final project report of the OULDI-JISC project: Challenge and change in curriculum design process, communities, visualisation and practice. York: JISC.
  • Dalziel, J. (2003). Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system (LAMS). In ASCILITE: 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Wollongong, NSW.
  • Dalziel, J. (2008). Learning design: Sharing pedagogical know-how. In T. Iiyoshi & M. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content and open knowledge (pp. 375–388). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dalziel, J. (2015). Reflections on art and science of learning design and the Larnaca declaration. In M. Maina, B. Craft, & Y. Mor (Eds.), The art & science of learning design (pp. 3–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Dalziel, M., & de Barcelona, U. A. (2011). Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Task-as-workplan vs. Task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 69–91.
  • Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50–80.
  • Egbert, J. L., Shahrokni, S. A., Zhang, X., Yahia, I. A., Borysenko, N., Mohamed, A. F. S., … Ezeh, C. (2018). Planning for future inquiry: Gaps in the CALL research. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 39–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2018040103
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. New York: Oxford.
  • Erickson, T. (2000). Lingua francas for design: Sacred places and pattern languages. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 357–368). ACM Press, New York.
  • Frizell, S. S., & Hubscher, R, (2008). Using design patterns to support e-learning design. In. 404 L Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning 405 design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 144–166). Hershey: 406 IGI Global.
  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley Professional Computer Series, Pearson Education.
  • Garzotto, F., & Poggi, C. (2010). Design patterns for collaborative learning experiences in Online 3d worlds. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design 387 patterns and pattern languages (pp. 83–106). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Gelan, A., Fastré, G., Verjans, M., Martin, N., Janssenswillen, G., Creemers, M., … Thomas, M. (2018). Affordances and limitations of learning analytics for computer-assisted language learning: A case study of the VITAL project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 294–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1418382
  • Georgiakakis, P., Retalis, S., & Psaromiligkos, Y. (2010). Design patterns for inspection-based usability evaluation of e-learning systems. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 167–182). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Ghislandi, P. M. M., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2015). Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 280–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12257
  • González-Lloret, M. (2015). A Practical Guide to Integrating Technology Into Task-Based Language Teaching. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • González-Lloret, M., Ortega, L., (2014). Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1344
  • Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design (HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 27-50). Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-2
  • Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (2010). Learning, technology and design. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 1–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Goodyear, P., & Yang, D. F. (2009). Patterns and pattern languages in educational design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications, and technologies (pp. 167–187). London: IGI Global
  • Hampels, R., & Pleines, C. (2013). Fostering student interaction and engagement in a virtual learning environment: An Investigtion into activity design and implementation. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 342–370.
  • Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacón, J., Prieto, L. P., & Persico, D. (2018). An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5. 15 May 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009
  • Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7, 97–111.
  • Kuure, L., Molin-Juustila, T., Keisanen, T., Riekki, M., Iivari, N., & Kinnula, M. (2016). Switching perspectives: From a language teacher to a designer of language learning with new technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 925–941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1068815
  • Law, N., Li, L., Herrera, L. F., Chan, A., & Pong, T.-C. (2017). A pattern language based learning design studio for an analytics informed inter-professional design community. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, IxD&A, 33, 92–112.
  • Levy, M., & Caws, C. (2016). CALL design and research: Taking a micro and macro view. In C. Caws & M. Hamel (Eds.), Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and call applications (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Levy, M., Hubbard, P., Stockwell, G., & Colpaert, J. (2015). Research challenges in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1), 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.987035
  • Ljubojevic, D., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Theoretical approach to distillation of pedagogical patterns from practice to enable transfer and reuse of good teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 11, 48–61.
  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G., … Whittlestone, K. (2013). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x
  • Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2019). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transaction on learning technologies. 12(4), 516–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673
  • Matthews, J., O'Toole, J. M., & Chen, S. (2017). The impact of word recognition from speech (WRS) proficiency level on interaction, task success and word learning: Design implications for CALL to develop L2 WRS. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 22–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1129348
  • Mor, Y., & Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: Collaborative design inquiry as teachers’ professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 220–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
  • Mor, Y., Mellar, H., Warburton, S., & Winters, N., (2014). Introduction: Using design patterns to develop and share effective practice. In Y., Mor, H., Mellar, S., Warburton, & N. Winters, (Eds.), Practical Design Patterns for Teaching and Learning with Technology (pp. 1–11). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Persico, D., Pozzi, F., Anastopoulou, S., Conole, G., Craft, B., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). Learning design Rashomon I – supporting the design of one lesson through different approaches. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 202–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20224
  • Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015
  • Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of 151 learning designs on student satisfaction and performance: Social learning (analytics) matters. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 339–343), Edinburgh, United Kingdom: ACM, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q., Holmes, W., & Reedy, K. (2017). A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, IxD&A, 33, 134–154.
  • Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2018). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: The role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1401548
  • Schümmer, T. (2010). Best practice for the pattern scout. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 255–276). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & de Freitas, S. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners shape their experiences. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Sun, S. Y. H. (2011). Online language teaching: The pedagogical challenges. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3), 428–447.
  • Sun, S. Y. H. (2016). Learntime and learning place-focused forward-oriented design for learning in technology-enhanced classrooms. Distance Education, 37(3), 349–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1233051
  • Sun, S. Y. H. (2017). Design for CALL – possible synergies between CALL and design for learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 575–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1329216
  • Taylor, L., & Fagan, T. (2014). Disrupting the boundaries of teaching and learning: How digital devices became a resource for transformative change in a time of crisis (The Pegasus digital devices project 2013). Te Toi Tupu: CORE Education. Retrieved from http://www.core-ed.org/research-and-innovation/research/disrupting-the-boundaries-of-teaching-and-learning-summary/abridged/
  • Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Yu, P., Pan, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Z., Shi, Q., Chu, W., … Zhu, Z. (2016). User-centered design for Chinese-oriented spoken English learning system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 984–999. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1121877
  • Viljamaa, J. (1997). Tools supporting the use of design patterns in frameworks (Technical report). Finland: Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki.
  • Vinek, G., & Derntl, M. (2003). The pattern approach – capturing proven solutions with special focus on architecture, software engineering, and pedagogy. Institute for Computer Science and Business Informatics, University of Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Pattern-Approach-%E2%80%93-Capturing-Proven-Solutions-Vinek-Derntl/ad76e91ddb43f48e283d25898c21ffe210e8f263

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.