Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity

References

• Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision process in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distancein distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. C. J., & Lo, H. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., & Lim, S. (2017). Using regulation activities to improve undergraduate collaborative writing on wikis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52, 141–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, S. (2013). The study skills handbook. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Hämäläinen, R., Voet, M., & Gielen, M. (2015). A wiki task for first-year university students: The effect of scripting students’ collaboration. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. (2007). Case study research in applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferna’ndez Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing, group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–86). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, M., Rogers, P., Austin, L., & McCormick, M. (1991). Exploring the impact of face-to-face collaborative technology on group writing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2015). Promoting and researching adaptive regulation: New frontiers for CSCL research. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 559–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., … Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, U. (2013). Can they plan to teach with Web 2.0? Future teachers' potential use of the emerging web. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2013). In piazza online: Exploring the use of wikis with beginner foreign language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752–769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki: Two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in EFL collaborative writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2016). Social constructivist approach to web-based EFL learning: Collaboration, motivation, and perception on the use of google docs. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45(4), 605–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: Statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 137–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Horn, I. S. (2011). Motivation, engagement, and identity: Opening a conversation. In D. McInerney, R. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 109–135). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. L., Aaron, C., & Michelle, R. L. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009013420053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Goodlet, J., Beck, E., Wood, C., Plowman, L., & Evans, W. (1993). Research issues in the study of computer supported collaborative writing. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative writing (pp. 9–28). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(4), 457–480. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 tasks: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46(2), 195–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2003). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 171–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000090
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–188). London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Volet, S. E., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revised (pp. 139–164). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1163397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar