References
- Annand, D. (2008). Learning efficacy and cost-effectiveness of print versus e-book instructional material in an introductory financial accounting course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2), 152–164.
- Armağan, S., Bozoğlu, O., Güven, E., & Çelik, K. (2016). Usage of video feedback in the course of writing in efl: Challenges and advantages. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 30(2), 95–102.
- Ashaver, D., & Igyuve, S. M. (2013). The use of audio-visual materials in the teaching and learning processes in colleges of education in Benue State-Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (Iosrjrme), 1(6), 44–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0164455
- Benson, P. (2012). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 157–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/357623
- Chen, C.-M., & Sun, Y.-C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273–1285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.006
- Chiau, T. P., Ali, A. M., Bakry, M. M., Azmi, N., & Paraidathatu, T. (2016). Video recording feedback in communication and counselling among pharmacy students. Is it better than verbal feedback?. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 50(2), 246–250.
- Clifford, J. (1981). Composing in stages: Effects of feedback on revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 37–53.
- Duncan, N. (2007). Feed-forward”: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600896498
- Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. London: Oxford University Press.
- Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B. R., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., … Mong, C. J. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x
- Gaier, E. L. (1954). A study of memory under conditions of stimulated recall. The Journal of General Psychology, 50(1), 147–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1954.9710111
- Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Ge, Z.-G. (2011). Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 75–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9103-7
- Ge, Z.-G. (2012). Cyber asynchronous versus blended cyber approach in distance English learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 286–297.
- Ge, Z.-G. (2014). The application of Camtasia Studio in the development of English online courseware. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 341–345.
- Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878
- Hung, S.-T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98(3), 90–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.009
- Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
- Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.
- Kim, S. H. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20–35.
- Lin, G.-Y. (2018). Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers & Education, 116, 81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010
- Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 650–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.007
- Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
- Loewenthal, K. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
- Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100–115.
- McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153–169.
- Maione, L., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Effects of video modeling and video feedback on peer-directed social language skills of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 106–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080020201
- Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903201651
- Paivio, A., & Desrochers, A. (1980). A Dual-coding Approach to Building Memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 34(4), 388–899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081101
- Panitz, T. (1997). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED448443.pdf.
- Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2018). The impact of anonymous marking on students’ perceptions of fairness, feedback and relationships with lecturers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1183–1193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594
- Popta, E. V., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003
- Poslawsky, I. E., Naber, F. B., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van Daalen, E., van Engeland, H., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Video-feedback intervention to promote Positive Parenting adapted to Autism (VIPP-AUTI): A randomized controlled trial. Autism, 19(5), 588–603. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314537124
- Purves, A. (1984). The teacher as reader: An anatomy. College English, 46(3), 259–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/377036
- Scott, C. R. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. Free Speech Yearbook, 41(1), 127–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.2004.10556309
- Sheerin, S. (1987). Listening comprehension: Teaching or testing?. ELT Journal, 41(2), 126–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.2.126
- Shih, R.-C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883–897. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048
- Shih, R.-C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829–845. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.934
- Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning?. In A. S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher,V. Tinto, B. L. Smith, & J. MacGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 9–22). University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University.
- Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case study from psychology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
- Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–29). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Tedick, D., & Walker, C. L. (1995). From theory to practice: How do we prepare teachers for second language classrooms?. Foreign Language Annals, 28(4), 499–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00823.x
- Thompson, R., & Lee, M. J. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1[Online] Retrieved from https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/Talking-with-Students-through-Screencasting_-Experimentations-with-Video-Feedback-to-Improve-Student-Learning.pdf
- Tochon, F. (2008). A brief history of video feedback and its role in foreign language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 420–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.420-435
- Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
- Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
- Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
- West, J., & Turner, W. (2015). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
- Woody, W., Daniel, D., & Baker, C. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
- Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
- Yang, Y. F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students’ writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 687–700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x
- Yang, Y. F. (2016). Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 683–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440
- Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055
- Ypsilandis, G. S. (2002). Feedback in distance education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(2), 167–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.2.167.8191
- Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
- Zhang, S. (2008). Assessing the impact of peer revision on English on English writing of tertiary EFL learners. Teaching English in China, 31(2), 47–54.