1,535
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Learning through WhatsApp: students’ beliefs, L2 pragmatic development and interpersonal relationships

References

  • Abdous, M., Facer, B.R., & Yen, C.J. (2012). Academic effectiveness of podcasting: A comparative study of integrated versus supplemented use of podcasting in second language classes. Computers & Education, 58(1), 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.021
  • Abraham, L & Williams, L. (Eds.). 2009. Electronic discourse in language learning and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Adams, P., & Martel, C. (2010). Conversational thread extraction and topic detection in text‐based chat. In Semantic computing (pp. 87−113). London: Wiley-IEEE Press.
  • Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.005
  • Alcón-Soler, E., & Martínez-Flor, A. (Eds.). (2008). Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Azad, M., Alipour, M., & Talebi, P. (2018). The effect of using social networks on developing EFL learners' pragmatic competence through speaking accuracy and fluency. Language Education Studies, 4(4), 15–24.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Introduction to teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum, 41(3), 37–39.
  • Bensalem, E., & Al-Zubaidi, K. (2018). The impact of Whatsapp on EFL students' vocabulary learning. SSRN Electronic Journal, 9(1), 1–16.
  • Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text‐based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227–240.
  • Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning. Georgetown, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Bush, M. D. (2013). Computer-assisted language learning: From vision to reality? CALICO Journal, 25(3), 443–470. doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.443-470
  • Chang, C.K., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation-annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155–180. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.536952
  • Ciftci, H. (2015). Pragmatic competence in EFL context: Suggestions in University Office hour discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Florida.
  • de Bot, K. (2004). The multilingual lexicon: Modeling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 17–32. doi:10.1080/14790710408668176
  • Deda, N. (2013). The role of pragmatics in English language teaching. Pragmatic competence. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 63–70.
  • Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z.R. (2020). The effect of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on EFL learners' comprehension of implicature. Applied Research on English Language, 9(1), 637–664.
  • Dewaele, J.M. (2013). Emotions in multiple languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dewaele, J.M. (2018). Pragmatic challenges in the communication of emotions in intercultural couples. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(1), 29–55. doi:10.1515/ip-2017-0029
  • Fernandez-Garcia, M., & Martinez-Arbelaiz, A. (2013). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 279–294. doi:10.1558/cj.v19i2.279-284
  • Flores-Salgado, E., & Castineira-Benitez, T. A. (2018). The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move ‘requests’. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 79–92. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009
  • Freiermuth, M., & Huang, H. (2012). Bringing Taiwan and Japan closer: A look at an intercultural online synchronous chat task and its effect on motivation. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 61–88. doi:10.1177/1362168811423341
  • García-Gómez, A. (2020). Intercultural and interpersonal communication failures: Analyzing hostile interactions among British and Spanish university students on WhatsApp. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17 (1), 27–51. doi:10.1515/ip-2020-0002
  • García-Gómez, A. (2018). Managing conflict on WhatsApp: A contrastive study of British and Spanish family disputes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(2), 320–340. doi:10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
  • Genc, H. (2012). An evaluation study of a CALL application: With BELT or without BELT. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 44–54.
  • Ghada, A. (2016). Effect of WhatsApp on critique writing proficiency and perceptions toward learning. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–26.
  • Gill, D. (2011). Effects of technology on second language learning. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 3(2). doi:10.19030/tlc.v3i2.1744
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2013). Emerging technologies: The technological imperative in teaching and learning less commonly taught languages. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 7–19.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  • Gon, S., & Raweka, A. (2017). Effectivity of E-Learning through Whatsapp as a Teaching Learning Tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(1), 19–25. doi:10.18311/mvpjms/0/v0/i0/8454
  • González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. Alcón Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114–134Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Gorjian, B., Hayati, A., & Pourkhoni, P. (2013). Using Praat software in teaching prosodic features to EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.505
  • Gruba, P., & Nguyen, N.B.C. (2019). Evaluating technology integration in a Vietnamese university language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 619–637. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1527365
  • Han, W. (2008). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6(9), 40–43.
  • Hani, N. A. B. (2014). The impact of WhatsApp Group’s utilization on EFL students’ vocabulary writing amelioration. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development, 5(2), 73–87.
  • Hepp K, P., Prats Fernández, M. À., & Holgado García, J. (2015). Teacher training: Technology helping to develop an innovative and reflective professional profile. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(2), 30–43. doi:10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2458
  • Hoopingarner, D. (2009). Best practices in technology and language teaching. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 222–235. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00123.x
  • Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–117. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.649485
  • Justina, M. (2016). Use of Whatsapp to enhance reading and writing skills at undergraduate college level. Language in India, 16(11), 47–60.
  • Kacetl, K., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in english language learning—a challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9 (3), 179. doi:10.3390/educsci9030179
  • Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
  • Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1384–1391. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012
  • Lara, D., & Lara, L. (2009). Podcasting: An effective tool for honing language students' pronunciation? Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 66–86.
  • Lee, B. A. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199–226.
  • Lee, L. (2009). Exploring native and nonnative interactive discourse in text-based chat beyond classroom settings. In L. Abraham & L. Williams (Eds.), Electronic discourse in language learning and language teaching (pp. 127–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 769–782. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
  • Lim, F. P. (2017). An analysis of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in e-learning. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 143, 230–234. doi:10.14257/astl.2017.143.46
  • Lorette, P., & Dewaele, J.M. (2015). Emotion recognition ability in English among L1 and LX users of English. International Journal of Language and Culture, 2(1), 62–86. doi:10.1075/ijolc.2.1.03lor
  • Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2017). Small talk is not cheap’: Phatic computer-mediated communication in intercultural classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(5), 432–446. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1304423
  • Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2018). Emotional self-presentation on WhatsApp: Analysis of the profile status. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 144–160. doi:10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-144-160
  • Man, C. (2014). Word’s Up with WhatsApp: The Use of Instant Messaging in Consciousness raising of Academic Vocabulary. 23rd MELTA and 12th Asia TEFL International Conference, 28–30 August 2014, Borneo Convention Centre, Kuching.
  • Martínez-Flor, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique Appliquee, 10(1), 47–76.
  • Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1990). Language and Society: Sociolinguistics. In N.E., Collinge (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language (pp. 485–517). London: Routledge.
  • Monserate, C. A. (2018). Impact of technology on the academic performance of students and teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 6(1), 47–87.
  • Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centered mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 177–120. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.649484
  • O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
  • Payne, S., & Whitney, P. J. (2013). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32. doi:10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32
  • Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Razagifard, P. (2013). The impact of text‐based CMC on improving L2 oral fluency. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 270–279. doi:10.1111/jcal.12000
  • Reinders, H., & Thomas, M. (2012). Contemporary computer assisted language learning. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
  • Salinas, J., Cabrera, A., & Ríos, S. (2012). Autonomy in foreign language learning in technology-mediated contexts. Onomázein, 25(1), 15–50.
  • Sam, P. (2016). Learning beyond the classroom through WhatsApp: An informal channel to motivate learners to stay connected. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(9), 1826–1833. doi:10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00910.2
  • Sarhandi, P. S. A., Asghar, J., & Abidi, A. A. (2018). Interaction patterns in WhatsApp conversation in EFL classroom: Pedagogical implications. Journal of Academic and Social Research, 1(1), 1–18.
  • Schmid, E. C. (2017). Teacher Education in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. A Sociocultural and Linguistic Perspective. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Skogs, J. (2014). Features of orality, academic writing and interaction in asynchronic student discussion forums. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13 (3), 54–82. doi:10.35360/njes.320
  • Spiteri, D. (2017). Multiculturalism, higher education and intercultural communication: Developing strengths-based narratives for teaching and learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), 105–120. doi:10.1017/S0958344007000225
  • Sydorenko, T., Smits, T. F. H., Evanini, K., & Ramanarayanan, V. (2019). Simulated speaking environments for language learning: Insights from three cases. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 17–48. (doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1466811
  • Sykes, J. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning intercultural competence and interlanguage pragmatics. In C. Chapelle, & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 119–133). London: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Taguchi, N. (2019). The routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. London: Routledge Handbooks.
  • Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford/New York: Oxford.
  • Takamiya, Y., & Ishihara, N. (2013). Blogging: Crosscultural interaction for pragmatic development. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 185–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ueki, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2017). The impact of studying abroad experience on the affective changes related to L2 motivation: A qualitative study of the process of change. In M. T. Apple, D. D. Silva, & T. Fellner (Eds.), L2 selves and motivations in Asian contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Vyver van der, A.G., Williams, B., & Marais, M. A. (2015). Using social media as a managerial platform for an educational development project: Cofimvaba. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(12), 910–913. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.636
  • Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007
  • Wrigglesworth, J., & Harvor, F. (2018). Making their own landscape: Smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437–458. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1412986
  • Xiao, F., Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2019). Effect of Proficiency subskills on Pragmatic development in L2 Chines Study Abroad. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 469–483. doi:10.1017/S0272263118000128
  • Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 48–67.
  • Yus, F. (2017). Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 66–86. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003
  • Zamuxolo, B., Nyembe, M., & Howard, G.R. (2019). The Utilities of Prominent Learning Theories for Mobile Collaborative Learning (MCL) with Reference to WhatsApp and M-learning. 2019 International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD), 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICABCD.2019.8851042

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.