758
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intention to use versus actual adoption of technology by university English language learners: what perceptions and factors matter?

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 3–15). Hilladale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy. Harlow, New York: Longman Pearson.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008
  • Chan, W. S. C. (2010). Students’ understanding of generic skills development in a university in Hong Kong. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4815–4819. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.776
  • Cheng, A., & Lee, C. (2018). Factors affecting tertiary English learners’ persistence in the self-directed language learning journey. System, 76, 170–182. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.06.001
  • Cheng, C.-H., & Chen, C.-H. (2019). Investigating the impacts of using a mobile interactive English learning system on the learning achievements and learning perceptions of student with different backgrounds. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1671460
  • Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
  • Chu, S. K. W., Capio, C. M., van Aalst, J., & Cheng, E. W. L. (2017). Evaluating the use of a social media tool for collaborative group writing of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 110, 17–180.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
  • Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010
  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  • Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department (2016). Thematic Household Survey Report 59. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of website: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40, 541–549.
  • Hsu, S.-Y. (2005). Building language-learning environments to help technological university students develop English independent learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(2), 51–66. doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v1n2.r10
  • Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2020). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet-based technology for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 575–591. doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. [Database] doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining students’ intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and social-cognitive frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 189–199. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.049
  • Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Lim, E. (2014). Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes, intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 427–439. doi:10.14742/ajet.681
  • Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
  • Kasemsap, K. (2017). Flipped classroom: Advanced issues and applications. In T. Kidd & L.R. Morris Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of research on instructional systems and educational technology (pp. 141–152). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274. doi:10.1080/03075070500095689
  • Lai, C. (2015). Modelling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005
  • Lai, C., Li, X.-S., & Wang, Q. (2017). Students’ perceptions of teacher impact on their self-directed language learning with technology beyond the classroom: Cases of Hong Kong and Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 1105–1133. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9523-4
  • Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569–579. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006
  • Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97.
  • Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Cheung, K. W. (2019). Learner perceptions versus technology usage: A study of adolescent English learners in Hong Kong secondary schools. Computers & Education, 133, 13–26.
  • Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of Youtube for procedural learning. An extension of the TAM. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
  • Mac Callum, K., & Kinshuk, L. J. (2014). Factors impacting teachers’ adoption of mobile learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 141–162. doi:10.28945/1970
  • Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76– 85.
  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2015). Mplus. The comprehensive modelling program for applied researchers: User’s guide, 5.
  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioural intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
  • Pena, M. I., & Yeung, A. S. (2009). University students’ satisfaction with online and face-to-face Spanish learning. International Journal of Learning, 16, 637–648.
  • Peng, T.-Q., Zhu, J. J. H., Tong, J.-J., & Jiang, S.-J. (2012). Predicting Internet non-users’ adoption intention and adoption behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 15(8), 1236–1257.
  • Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2011). Computer anxiety and ICT integration in English classes among EFL teachers. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 203–209. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.034
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: L. L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Staddon, R. V. (2020). Bring technology to the mature classroom: Age differences in age and attitudes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–20. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4
  • Taguchi, N., & Skyes, J. M. (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Teo, T., & Zhou, M-m. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142. doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3
  • Teo, T., Zhou, M., Chun, A. W. F., & Huang, F. (2019). Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: A study in Macau. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 749–766. doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x
  • Thang, S. M., Lee, Y. S., & Zulkifli, N. F. (2012). The role of the electronic portfolio in enhancing Information and Communication Technology and English language skills: The voices of six Malaysian undergraduates. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 277–293. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.655299
  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
  • Un Jan, A., & Contreras, V. (2011). Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 845–851. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.009
  • Valentin, A., Mateos, P. M., Gonzalez-Tablas, M. M., Perez, L., Lopez, E., & Garcia, I. (2013). Motivation and learning strategies in the use of ICTs among university students. Computers and Education, 61, 52–58.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Verhoeven, J.C., Heerwegh, D., & De Wit, K. D. (2010). Information and communication technologies in the life of university freshmen: An analysis of change. Computers & Education, 55, 53–66.
  • Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2020). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240–274. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692
  • Yang, F.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context. Computers & Education, 50, 1284–1303.
  • Zou, B., Smith, S., & Hoey, M. (Eds.). (2015). Corpus linguistics in Chinese contexts. Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.