6,177
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Social media as a language learning environment: a systematic review of the literature (2008-2019)

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity?Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
  • Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2020). Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4961–5002. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10197-1
  • American Association for Applied Linguistics. (2019). Call for proposals. https://www.aaal.org/news/2020-call-for-proposals.
  • Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. doi:10.1177/1367006913489198
  • Andujar, A., & Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S. (2019). Exploring chat-based communication in the EFL class: Computer and mobile environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1614632
  • Barrot, J. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: Impact and challenges. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 29(3), 286–301.
  • Barrot, J. (2018). Facebook as a learning environment in language teaching and learning: A critical analysis of the literature from 2010 to 2017. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 863–875.
  • Barrot, J. (2020). Scientific mapping of social media in education: A decade of exponential growth. Journal of Educational Computing Research. doi:10.1177/0735633­120972010
  • Barrot, J. S. (2021). Effects of Facebook-based e-portfolio on ESL learners’ writing performance. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 34(1), 95–111.
  • Bugeja, M. J. (2006). Facing the facebook. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(21), C1.
  • Chapelle, C., & Sauro. S. (eds.). (2017). The handbook of technology in second language teaching and learning. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605–616. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
  • Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86–114. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
  • Ding, J., Liu, C., & Kandonga, G. A. (2020). Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1303–1322. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03364-1
  • Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18–36. doi:10.1017/S095834400900010X
  • Eröz-Tuğa, B., & Sadler, R. (2009). Comparing six video chat tools: A critical evaluation by language teachers. Computers & Education, 53(3), 787–798. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.017
  • Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
  • Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through Twitter: The case of commonly mispronounced words. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 631–663. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1340309
  • Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
  • Guichon, N., & Cohen, C. (2014). The impact of the webcam on an online L2 interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(3), 331–354. doi:10.3138/cmlr.2102
  • Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. doi:10.1177/1741143216659296
  • Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685.
  • Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86.
  • Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209–230. doi:10.1177/1741143218822772
  • Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. doi:10.3102/0034654319830380
  • Hattem, D., & Lomicka, L. (2016). What the Tweets say: A critical analysis of Twitter research in language learning from 2009 to 2016. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1–2), 5–23. doi:10.1177/2042753016672350
  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W.S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Hsu, S. Y. S., & Beasley, R. E. (2019). The effects of international email and Skype interactions on computer-mediated communication perceptions and attitudes and intercultural competence in Taiwanese students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 149–162. doi:10.14742/ajet.4209
  • Jacsó, P. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Information Review, 33(4), 831–837. doi:10.1108/14684520910985756
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110. doi:10.1177/0042085906293818
  • Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. T. (2019). Supporting lower-level processes in EFL listening: The effect on learners’ listening proficiency of a dictation program supported by a mobile instant messaging app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1671462
  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
  • Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
  • Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52–73.
  • Labus, A., Despotović‐Zrakić, M., Radenković, B., Bogdanović, Z., & Radenković, M. (2015). Enhancing formal e‐learning with edutainment on social networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 592–605. doi:10.1111/jcal.12108
  • Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners. System, 40(1), 48–63.
  • Luo, H., & Gui, M. (2019). Developing an effective Chinese-American telecollaborative learning program: An action research study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1633355
  • Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London, UK: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  • Manca, S. (2020). Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100707. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707
  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An update critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528. doi:10.1111/jcal.12154
  • Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study of high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002
  • Maranto, G., & Barton, M. (2010). Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 36–47. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003
  • Menzies, R., Petrie, K., & Zarb, M. (2017). A case study of Facebook use: Outlining a multi-layer strategy for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 39–53. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9436-y
  • Miller, L., Hafner, C. A., & Fun, C. N. K. (2012). Project-based learning in a technologically enhanced learning environment for second language learners: Students’ perceptions. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(2), 183–195. doi:10.2304/elea.2012.9.2.183
  • Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345–368. doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.345-368
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G., PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
  • OECD. (2019). Society at a glance 2019: OECD social indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/soc_glance-2019-en
  • Okan, Z. (2003). Edutainment: Is learning at risk?British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 255–264. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00325
  • Paul, J. Z., & Friginal, E. (2019). The effects of symmetric and asymmetric social networks on second language communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 587–618. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1527364
  • Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. doi:10.1017/S0261444818000356
  • Sabharwal, M. (2013). Comparing research productivity across disciplines and career stages. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 141–163. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785149
  • Scopus. (2020). Content. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content.
  • Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Report 7: Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Bristol, England: Futurelab.
  • Shih, R. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829–845. doi:10.14742/ajet.934
  • Solmaz, O. (2018). A critical review of research on social networking sites in language teaching and learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 315–330. doi:10.30935/cet.444120
  • Statista. (2020a, April 1). Number of global social network users 2010–2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/.
  • Statista. (2020b, August 21). Most popular social networks worldwide as of July 2020, ranked by number of active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.
  • Statista. (2020c, February 14). Global social media account ownership and use 2019, by age group. https://www.statista.com/statistics/381964/number-of-social-media-accounts/.
  • Tijssen, R. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world’s largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13–24. doi:10.3152/095820209X393145
  • Toetenel, L. (2014). Social networking: A collaborative open educational resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 149–162. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.818561
  • Urien, B., Erro-Garcés, A., & Osca, A. (2019). WhatsApp usefulness as a communication tool in an educational context. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2585–2602. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09876-5
  • Wang, Y. (2018). The panorama of the last decade’s theoretical groundings of educational leadership research: A concept co-occurrence network analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 327–365. doi:10.1177/0013161X18761342
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi:10.1177/1094428114562629

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.