Unpacking themes of integrating telecollaboration in language teacher education: a systematic review of 36 studies from 2009 to 2019

References

Studies Included in the Systematic Review

• Al Khateeb, A. A. (2018). Assessing English teachers as a foreign language (EFL) telecollaborative competence: A case study from Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 52–69. doi:10.5539/elt.v11n4p52
   Google Scholar
• Antoniadou, V. (2011). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions in an online transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a foreign Language. ReCALL, 23(3), 233–251. doi:10.1017/S0958344011000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni, A., Dooly, M., García, P. G., Guth, S., Hauck, M., Helm, F., & Rogaten, J. (2019). Executive Summary – the key findings from the EVALUATE European Policy Experiment Project on the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education, Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2019.30.9782490057344
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Esteban, S. G. (2016). Telecollaboration to improve CLIL and TPACK knowledge: Aid or hindrance?Estudios Sobre Educación, 31, 117–138. doi:10.15581/004.31.117-138
   Google Scholar
• Cavalari, S., & Aranha, S. (2019). The teacher’s role in telecollaborative language learning: The case of institutional integrated teletandem. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 19(3), 555–578. doi:10.1590/1984-6398201913576
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. C. (2012). Professional growth during cyber collaboration between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 218–228. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damrow, A. L., & Sweeney, J. S. (2019). Beyond the bubble: Preparing preservice teachers through dialogue across distance and difference. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 255–265. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. (2009). New competencies in a new era? Examining the impact of a teacher training project. ReCALL, 21(3), 352–369. doi:10.1017/S0958344009990085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25(1), 4–29. doi:10.1017/S0958344012000237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2020). If you don’t improve, what’s the point?” Investigating the impact of a “flipped” online exchange in teacher education. ReCALL, 32(1), 4–24. doi:10.1017/S0958344019000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest, P., Guitert Catasús, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., & Stickler, U. (2013). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 311–333. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.667814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Cross-institutional blended learning in teacher education: A case study. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(2), 30–49. doi:10.4018/jmbl.2010040103
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2016). Are you able to access this website at all?” Team negotiations and macro-level challenges in telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1152–1168. doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1167091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2019). Critical incidents and cultures-of-use in a Hong Kong–Germany telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 74–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., Snyder, B., Tung, B., & Han, Y. J. (2017). The multiple roles of the task design mediator in telecollaboration. ReCALL, 29(3), 239–256. doi:10.1017/S0958344017000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., Hauck, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Esteban, S., Villarreal, I., & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2019). The effect of telecollaboration in the development of the learning to learn competence in CLIL teacher training. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1614960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, M. K., & Turula, A. (2019). Experiential learning of telecollaborative competences in pre-service teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria. System, 64, 7–20. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2019). The formative role of teaching presence in blended virtual exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, G., & Spector-Cohen, E. (2018). Examining international telecollaboration in language teacher education. In D. Tafazoli, M. Gomez Parra, & C. Huertas-Abril (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 322–345). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5463-9.ch018
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2018). Implementing computer‐mediated intercultural communication in English education: A critical reflection on its pedagogical challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 673–687. doi:10.1111/jcal.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchor-Couto, S., & Jauregi, K. (2016). Teacher competences for telecollaboration: The role of coaching. In S. Jager, M. Kurek, & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (pp. 185–192). Dublin, Ireland: Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2016.telecollab2016.506
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Hartmann, A. (2016). A task is a task is a task is a task… or is it? Researching telecollaborative teacher competence development – The need for more qualitative research. In S. Jager, M. Kurek, & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (pp. 31–43). Research-publishing. net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2016.telecollab2016.488
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173–188. doi:10.1080/09588220902778369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2015a). Supporting in-service language educators in learning to telecollaborate. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Barreto, L. S. (2019). The intercultural competence in Colombian university teachers’ analysis of a questionnaire. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 30–47. doi:10.5539/elt.v12n1p30
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, S. (2016). Student perspectives on intercultural learning from an online teacher education partnership. In S. Jager, M. Kurek, & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (p. 83). Research-publishing. net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2016.telecollab2016.493
   Google Scholar
• Sundh, S. (2018). International exchange of ideas in student-interactive videoconferences:–sustainable communication for developing intercultural understanding with student teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(2), 123–133. doi:10.2478/dcse-2018-0019
   Google Scholar
• Tanghe, S., & Park, G. (2016). “Build[ing] something which alone we could not have done”: International collaborative teaching and learning in language teacher education. System, 57, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turula, A. (2017). Teaching presence in telecollaboration: Keeping an open mind. System, 64, 21–33. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turula, A., & Raith, T. (2015). Telecollaboration insights: Learning from exchanges that fail. The EuroCALL Review, 23(2), 19–37. doi:10.4995/eurocall.2015.4666
   Google Scholar
• Uzum, B., Yazan, B., Avineri, N., & Akayoglu, S. (2019). Preservice teachers’ discursive constructions of cultural practices in a multicultural telecollaboration. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 21(1), 82–104. doi:10.18251/ijme.v21i1.1777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinagre, M. (2016). Training teachers for virtual collaboration: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 787–802. doi:10.1111/bjet.12363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinagre, M. (2017). Developing teachers’ telecollaborative competences in online experiential learning. System, 64, 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, P., & Kessler, G. (2016). Telecollaboration in the secondary language classroom: Case study of adolescent interaction and pedagogical integration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 427–450. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.961481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Studies Included as References

• Akiyama, Y., & Cunningham, J. D. (2017). Synthesizing the practice of SCMC-based telecollaboration: A scoping review. CALICO Journal, 35(1), 49–76. doi:10.1558/cj.33156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2005). Using computer-mediated communication to establish social and supportive environments in teacher education. CALICO, 22, 537–566. doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.537-566
   Google Scholar
• Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 819–853. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional faultline. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 71–89. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiftçi, E. Y., & Savaş, P. (2018). The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: A synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015. ReCALL, 30(3), 278–298. doi:10.1017/S0958344017000313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2019). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. (2011). Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Task-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 69–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (Eds.) (2018). In this together: Teachers’ experiences with transnational, telecollaborative language learning projects. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2007). Student language teachers as intercultural learners in CMC-based project work. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 13. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr13/fuchs.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Guth, S. & Helm, F. (Eds.) (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-3-0351-0013-6
   Google Scholar
• Helm, F. (2013). A dialogic model for telecollaboration. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(2), 28–48. doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.522
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2014). The process of becoming reflexive and intercultural: Navigating study abroad and reentry experience. In B. J. Clark & F. Dervin (Eds.), Reflexivity in language and intercultural education (pp. 53–73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, M. N., & Goodfellow, R. (2010). Telecollaboration and learning 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 107–138). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., & O’Dowd, R. (2016). Online intercultural exchange and foreign language learning: A systematic review. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice (pp. 35–80). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315678931
   Google Scholar
• Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2007). Foreign language teacher preparation and asynchronous CMC: Promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(4), 513–532.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H., & Yang, C. (2018). Twenty years of telecollaborative practice: Implications for teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5/6), 546–571. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1420083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd (CA).
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Hartmann, A. (2006). Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration: A model for language teacher education. In J. A. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-Mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education (pp. 63–84). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2011). Intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 342–358). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2015b). The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 194–207. doi:10.1080/09571736.2013.853374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2016). Emerging trends and new directions in telecollaborative learning. CALICO Journal, 33(3), 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector‐Cohen, E. (2020). The role of pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 146–172. doi:10.1002/tesq.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passarelli, A. M., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Using experiential learning theory to promote student learning and development in programs of education abroad. In M. Vande Berg, R. M. Paige, & K. H. Lou (Eds.), Student learning abroad (pp. 137–361). Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, P. (2005). Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Ware, P., & Liaw, M. L. (2020). Promoting peer-to-peer synchronous online discussions: Case study of intercultural communication in telecollaboration. In L. Wilton & C. Brett (Eds.), Handbook of research on online discussion-based teaching methods (pp. 283–310). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3292-8.ch012
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Liaw, M., & Ware, P. (2021). Exploring language teacher noticing in the context of interuclutral telecollaboration. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Teaching and Learning, Southern Methodist University.
   Google Scholar